"Black Square" by Malevich: who feels that, looking at this picture

[Veronic]

I have found an interesting article about the Black Square.

"I guess an" expert "to" modern art "in one of the funds in Russia, the current American money. We bring" art projects ", and we should decide to give or not give money to implement them. With me in expert advice a team of true experts in the "old", dokvadratnomu art, are connoisseurs. We can not bear box and "self-affirmation of the principle which has its name abomination of desolation." But we have projects and have another abomination of desolation, only abomination and nothing else. We must spend the allocated money for us, otherwise the fund will close. And he feeds too many of our poor country. We try, at least, to give money to those who thought the least contrary and nonsensical. In the past year had given money to the artist, putting up the empty frames along River, another in capital letters (word) "I" that holds a nice shade, a group of creators, who organized the rally to collect feces for dogs in the parks of St. Petersburg. This year - the woman, plaster stones stamps and sends them to cities in Russia, and group, spilling a pool of blood in a submarine: the visitors must cross the puddle under the reading of the history of Abelard and Heloise, is playing in the headphones. After the next meeting we will go out and smoke in silence, not looking at each other's eyes. Then he shook hands and hurried quickly disperse. "


Fully

http://art.photo-element.ru/analysis/square/square.html

[NATA NOVA]

That's what I feel:

[Jasmin]

Tatyana thick - my favorite writer, I like how she writes and writes. In including the square. On the black.

[NATA NOVA]

And I do not like it Sov, vulgar, assertive style of communication-gegemontsky ..

[Buscador]

Originally Posted by Veronic

who and what feels looking at this picture

I do not feel it, because I do not look at him. There is love, beauty, is the Sun, Morning Dawn and Evening Sunset, there are people, there is nature ....
And the squares - for those who can not see the beauty ...

[sss]

"Black Square" ...

Originally Posted by Buscador

I do not feel

You're in luck! Many feel nausea and revulsion. ))

Suprematism has completely and rational perception, without fainting.
You can just utilitarian - use the square as a reference point. ))
To all other, it is not only in the context of the time, era, theory, ideology ... but in the context of the works of Malevich, with which you are (judging by the avatar) sweet talk.
So, your desire, certainly surgically separating the ear from a mobile phone, looks strange.

Originally Posted by Buscador

There is love, beauty, is the Sun, Morning Dawn and Evening Sunset, there are people, there is nature ....
And the squares - for those who can not see the beauty ...

Squares for those who understand that they (the squares) are in the same row with Love, Blood and Carrots ... The beauty, the sun, the morning dawn and the twilight sky, with people, nature .... (a even, in all the above you, there is opposition, like Dusk - Dawn, morning - evening, which you have managed to reward a positive value, because it is - it is beautiful).

In search of sensuality you confuse the concept of "depict" and "display". In the visual arts - this is not the same thing. ))

[SAH]

sss, well said.

[artist]

Originally Posted by Veronic

I think that the "black box" Malevich - a masterpiece ... Personally, I see in this work the symbol technological revolution .... Malevich foresaw where humanity will grow, and brilliantly showed this square.

And as you know it ... "

I allow myself to just two opinions, or rather one opinion and one impression)
1. opinion.
I can not take Kazemir Severinovich great (brilliant) artist. I understand that humanity is not on my side, but I will try briefly to argue. Still, the greatness of the author provides for his professionalism (this is not a sufficient condition, of course, but necessary). Many amateurs, buy and sell in the past century, and did not give a single "Great." Price High was given, and the Great - no.

What we have in the beginning and a little more then a COP? A weak imitation, trying to survive another man's long experienced impression.
What we have on top? Cheka (I did not include a strip of their arguments amusing texts of the COP. Sometimes they are talented, but we are - about the fine). Theory did not save the COP and he was "brilliant" does not understand that he created. With all the significant impact on out. Art of the Cheka, the author, he also - a theorist, he did not understand. For further continued figachit useless (except, of course, segogodnyashnih art dealers, colored and achromatic geometric shapes. And this is putting such a point?
Not professionally. Trite not vehal. While saying a great deal, but the case that "words matter ..."

2. impression (contrary ... or not).
The end of perestroika, the year I couldnt, in the Tretyakov Gallery, in the Crimea, one of the many then "painting the beginning of the twentieth century" ... decoration traditionally - red, sacking, employment soar ... Cheka in the center ...
I look at it from a distance of four meters. Next, with the same distance he considers simpatishnaya girl. Enjoying silence. Gaze! Then look at each other and I say:
- What it seems to me: what is he ....
- And it seems to me. something is wrong ... - Meet me pretty girl.
We are approaching the work, and a piece of paper, pinned to the sacking beneath the Cheka, reads: "... the author's repetition of"

Thus here)))
I take this opportunity to convey greetings to all who knows me and all the cute girls!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by artist

We are approaching the work, and a piece of paper, pinned to the sacking beneath the Cheka, we read:" ... the author's repetition of "

So what? They are now 4 pieces. known.
Malevich created several versions of "Black Square". All known versions of "Squares", written by Malevich from 1915 to early 1930's, "the development of one theme. They differ not only in sequence and year of creation, but also the color, design and texture.
 But the author never copied the "always created a new version.
"Copyright repeat" ... So what?

[artist]

not "torknulo "))))