The value of the underground works of artists today is much higher than their price.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Fed

You will be amused to learn that at Bonhams, London two good work Egorov for 600 pounds is not purchased.

And when was that?
You can link to?

[Fed]

Bonhams, London - 2006-06-20
Initial price: £ 600.00
Sold: £ 0.00
Lot 82 - unsold.

I do not vayayu this is no trend. Simply, if not to hurry, then a lot of things you can gather up a few at normal prices.
Recently there was a case about which I regret. Now, "Ducat offers job Sychev, which I like very much. It would be cool if it could get Odessa Museum sovr.iskusstva. And I could for a month at any time to buy a brighter job a little less (though not so super) for 1200. Something is not smart enough. Now I'm sorry.
That's me to the fact that every manner of collecting chooses for himself, someone takes that right away like someone waiting for a profitable time. So, what I write applies to my style and my vision of the situation.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Fed

It's me to the fact that every manner of collecting chooses for himself, someone takes that right away like it, someone is waiting for favorable moment.

Here's an auction and pushes contemplating the acquisition.
And if we in the hall there is a willing, will go to auction and care will exceed the estimate.

Added after 6 minutes

Сообщение от Fed

Bonhams, London - 2006-06-20

Several were on June 20 auction.

Egorov, where were you?
On Modern Pictures in Knightsbridge or on Contemporary Art in New Bond Street?

[Вивьен]

[QUOTE="Fed; 1305481] Yes, they died or left almost everything. A few old men left.
[/QUOTE]
Not a few, and not the elderly. There is life in the old dog yet!
Came recently to the "Last Supper" by Oleg Voloshinova, look how handsome.
Left to right: Marinyuk, Stovbur Strelnikov, Voloshin, Naumets.

[size="1"]Добавлено через 13 минут[/size]
Artists Odessa, issue first, in 1980

[Вивьен]

Artists Odessa, issue first, in 1980

[Вивьен]

Сообщение от SAH

self-published edition of the 80-year "Odessa artists" gives a list of avant-garde artists of the Odessa: Valentin Khrushchev, Yevgeny Rakhmanin, Nikolai Morozov, Vladimir Tsyupko, Igor Bojko, Alexander Stovbur, Valery Basanets, Michael Kowalski, Sergey Knyazev, Vladimir Naumets, Nikolai Stepanov, Alexander Dmitriev, Hope Hayduk, Vladimir Sazonov, Victor Risovich, Michael Cherry, Evgeni Godenko, Ruslan Mako, Anatoly Shopin, Oleg Sokolov, Yuri Yegorov, Alexander Anufriyev, Vladimir Strelnikov, Lyudmila Hawk, Victor Marinyuk.

Continue. Second edition 1980

[Вивьен]

...............................................

[Fed]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

A few had on June 20 auction.

Egorov, where he was?

20 Jun 2006

Knightsbridge

[Станиславский]

If you go back to the question posed by the topic title, you should probably say this. Category values and its correlation with the price - is the subject of endless and pointless debate. Forms the market price, and he, my dear, is the only measure of value of works of art. But the market - this is not something static. It too can (and should) form. Successfully at one time represented artists Carpathian school lightning became market leaders. Perhaps it makes sense to talk about right or not the representation of various authors, movements and styles on the market about the same "promotion", which is why it is so lightly spoken author of one of the first posts. And here we must pay tribute to Odessa. They succeeded more than others in this noble cause, carefully, painstakingly and tirelessly promoting the creation of "their" masters. Honor them for it and praise. However, non-conformism - a phenomenon not limited to a particular town or even country. It is the spirit of the time, which "flies where it wants."

Wherefore organizers of the auction do, in my opinion, a very big thing, trying to expand the area of "non-art is not only outside of Odessa, but also beyond Ukraine itself. The concept is to show (do not pull the ears), the organic link between the search Ukrainian avant-garde, Soviet "underground" and modern "non", and all of them together - with the trend of European and world art. From this apparent eclecticism in the selection of works, where the actual "classic" genre - Hmelyuk, shepherds and Shapiro - side by side with very young representatives of contemporary art. And it will agree, is creating new choices and new perspectives Collecting.

I, as citizen of Lviv can not but mention the fact that the auction presents an excellent "nonkoformistskie" (taking the term in quotes because of its apparent conventionality) of my sogorozhan who confess honestly, it's hard to find even for us. Here are some of them.

Oleg Minko "Conversation", Yuri Scherbatenko "Picasso", Sergei Savchenko, "Nude", Henrietta Levitskaya "Self Portrait", Konstantin Kachanov "Mannequins."

[Fed]

Сообщение от "Stanislavsky, 1306191

Category values and its correlation with the price - is the subject of endless and pointless debate.

Aimless discussion - only until the readings of money.
I also like 2 of the above your work, especially Savchenko.

But as the diligent reader forum, I am guided by the views of the guru:
Pavel always said - it is easy to buy and sell hard.
Eugene-regional artists interested in the regions.
The question arises (at dostavanii purse) - how many are working. Reduced cost approximately $ 3000. And none of the scanned database of auctions they do not have any records.

 Who gets in this price category? Open at random results "Corners". And, whatever works, consider the names and prices in the 3000 - Hope Benoit, Gromnitskaya, Shovkunenko, Princess Olga Romanova, watercolor Glushchenko. Can I later sell them, and without loss-solve themselves.

 Will be the standard denials, like - there are small graphics, to me it's more like it (but for some reason do not buy). For these oprovergateley go to the other side. Order the work in the studio folk artist (in the spirit of non-conformism and sketches) is still possible for 1500. Will write the auction and dozens of museums in the real basics.

Question-why pay more, in this case (much risk). Moreover, a factor of 2.

Each style of shopping chooses for himself. But, unlike the unpromising discussions, the possibility of uneconomic sales, much worse.