Legendary forgers staged a solo exhibition

[Konstantin]

Subject is interesting, please comment on the merits.

[Veronic]

In general, appraisers and art seems summed up the technical side of implementation falshakov. Namely, the materials and there was also a signature? That is called "Do not believe your eyes" it is possible that they too had doubts, but the materials of the time and decided to all signature.

I agree that to pick up materials at the time and wear out the picture - this is the most difficult.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Konstantin

interest in the subject, please comment on the merits.

What is there to basically say?
 29 May 1945 Meegerena arrested on charges of collaborating with the Nazis. 12 July, he makes a sensational confession that he wrote the court discussed the picture. He, of course, nobody believes. Investigators arrange a kind of judicial experiment, in which Meegeren must prove that he can imitate the masters of XVII century. Just write them under the supervision of the investigation proved his authorship of the forgery.

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

All in the Netherlands in the 45-m were fools, and in 2010 the forum ARTinvestment.RU-wise.

Cyril I already wrote on the forum ,.... now I can not find, but can you can find .....
About the painting by Caravaggio, one that was stolen from the Odessa museum. So, when we visited the museum that the painting was still in place, I remember how I admired her, and Arthur says, "This job is not like Caravaggio's" I'm still arguing with him, saying that many experts it looked, but they do not could be mistaken. But Arthur was left to his own opinion, said that it was not Caravaggio's all! That he just feels it. He says that not enough volume, the technique is but somehow dry.

http://yug.odessa.ua/index.php/home/arc/393.html

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Veronic

Kirill, I have already written on the forum ,.... now I can not find, but can you can find .....
About the painting by Caravaggio, one that was stolen from the Odessa museum. So, when we visited the museum that the painting was still in place, I remember how I admired her, and Arthur says, "This job is not like Caravaggio's" I'm still arguing with him, saying that many experts it looked, but they do not could be mistaken. But Arthur was left to his own opinion, said that it was not Caravaggio's all! That he just feels it. He says that not enough volume, the technique is but somehow dry.

This is once again suggests that those who went to school and see and feel a much deeper ..
And If I do not know (or do not understand) it does not mean that it does not exist.
And the biggest misconception is the unshakable belief that neposobny mistake.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Veronic

But Arthur was left to his own opinion, said that it is not by Caravaggio and all!

From "The Taking of Christ in custody, in fact, there are questions.
Such works have known two of Caravaggio: in Odessa, dating from the 1598 year, and more izaestnaya, in Dublin, dating from 1602.

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

What? Already there is evidence of counterfeit items from Odessa?

No, of course, I just described a subjective assessment of the artist. By the way, in Odessa, there are other good work, but about which Arthur said nothing, but now with Caravaggio was adamant.
Note, Cyril, that to Odessa, we were already in the museums of Paris, Budapest, Moscow, Kiev, that is certain is nasmotrennost.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Veronic

I'm still arguing with him, saying that many experts it looked, but they could not be mistaken.

And you think that if some experts with the latest scientific techniques to prove that the famous thing, such as the Hermitage, can not belong to the artist N., now immediately be removed from exposure or make a change in labels, it will write "N /V ?
And the public will be told that 300 years of looking at the picture of the artist N., and it is not his hand, and the picture is not it written?

[Veronic]

Cyril, it is difficult to say how do the museum, in each case, I think differently.
Recently, we have, for example, went to the exhibition of Italians (Raphael, Michelangelo, etc.) in Budapest, traveling exhibition. So there is exhibited a copy of Leonardo's "Madonna in the grotto" of his students. Excellent copy, by the way, I'd like to close the original and a copy of this view. This work is hung with a name and nothing, a lot of people crowded around it.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Veronic

Kirill's hard to say, as do the museum, in each case, I think differently.

There are no difficulties understanding the actions of the museum.
In our case, the vast-authorship of pereatributsiyah not inform the public.
The West a little differently. There even exist quota output from the museum's turnover.