Help with the assessment Aivazovsky

[мистер-у]

uriart, determine the authorship of Ayvazovski for serious work, not for this, vozmozhno.Mogu share opytom.Rabotu give for technological expertise in the Art-Konsalting.Poluchaete macro, UV, IR, Roentgen, Khim. analysis of the soil, the pigment pattern, pigment podpisi.Esli all matches take additional microsections and send a chemist to Kiev to L.N.Luginoy.U her standard base paint layer and ground throughout the period of hudozhnika.V If successful, Chemistry in Kiev can do attribution in Rossii.Naznachaetsya expert commission (you determine whom to call for your money) from respected experts Ignatov Petrov (in consulting will not go to watch separately) Rimsky-Korsakov and Goldovskiy.Pust each of them write atributsiyu.A then, in Depending on the views and relying on their own experience and knowledge make a decision you need the work or the money to pay net.Ved Vy.Da running around examination obtained under 10u.e. , but sleep peacefully.

[Glasha]

Сообщение от uriart

There is this view that he was written about 6000 works.
However. Judging by how much work appears on the market, we can say that There is more work than the author wrote.

Somewhere on the forum has already been reported that the market is walking about 36,000 ...

[uriart]

Dear Mister-y
Thanks for the advice. Very useful. With LN Luginov knew personally.
Even the book is that they have released with a reference base for Aivazovsky. Only here do not have the last time to buy his work. Painfully prices bite! And questions of many works.
Painfully like to write under it.

[Meister]

as an evaluation of figured out, I suggest all the same to return to our discussion with Eugene and a voting is, and perhaps create a separate post (I like to):
  Does the cost of restoration of things and whether you want to do it, if the thing is in poor condition?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Meister, it is very necessary, important and interesting topic.

[Grigory]

Dear Meister!
This will pull the two survey!

[Meister]

Grigory, and can in one post two surveys done? or not?

in a separate post: http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=7405

[Grigory]

Meister, one post - one poll.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Meister

suggest that all still go back to our dispute

You like to party meetings ..
The meaning of this topic to discuss is not clear .. The conversation was among, other things in the picture shown here, it is not necessary to restore unambiguously.
There are canvases, no stretchers, torn edges (not possible to even pull the canvas on stretcher), in this case the partial restoration (overlapping the edge of the canvas, a new sub-frame), well and all the rest of the work to the buyer to leave the picture.

[qwerty]

Сообщение от Meister

Does the cost of restoration of things and whether you want to do it, if the thing is in poor condition?

In this case, both are right, it all depends on what for the damage and what is done restoration. If minor damage, such as small shedding paint or burn-out gouaches, long hung in direct sunlight, it is better to leave everything "as is". Prospective buyers all clear: gray hair and wrinkles, if not painted, you earn respect.
If significant damage, such as sagging of the canvas, a hole in the canvas or folds on a sheet of graphics, then, of course, it is better to fix in the form of non-marketable thing is rejection. But in this case, it is important to have a highly professional restorers: we know many cases where the restorer kill work forever.
It is important and what is this thing: if it is an old work of a famous master, then the restoration must be treated extremely carefully, if it is a relatively fresh job done, say in the eighties, you can act boldly now, and if this is something the modern type Chamberlain, then - boldly forward - not be worse!