Rate this picture: Aivazovsky and Khudyakov

[Вивьен]

The second letter in the word "Rome" is more like "I", and then sealed the same color ink as the signature. Waves in the background level for Aivazovsky completely delitanski written.

[раскатов]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

This is a painting on the horizon, the town some.

It looks like a type of Kronstadt from the pier Peterhof. These places are depicted and Lagorio.

[eva777]

VYACHESLAV,
Thank you! It was very interesting to read about the flags!

[Дениссс]

Kirill skazhitepozhaluysta, and in Peter emt same gos.uchrezhdeniya, where they could carry out a survey? Thank you for the address

[color="# 666686"]Posted 6 minutes[/color]
Dear Alexander, thank you, but tell me what the signs point to the picture you negatively on the authorship Aivazovsky. I have information that is Aivazovsky and his disciple, perhaps Latri. If writing is not one person, that is, whether a painting showing signs of brush Aivazovsky? If writing is not one person, it is not surprising that it can find signs of involvement of the two, but it is important to have a hand Aivazovsky. Thank you in advance if you would draw your attention and say what evidence pointed specifically to you to separate yourself Aivazovsky to this object.

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от eva777

was very interesting to read about the flags!

  Information taken from here http://www.vexillographia.ru/russia/EmpirFlt.htm
And here http://www.vexillographia.ru/ all about the flags.

[Дениссс]

Сообщение от Mr-y

Do not build illusions is not I. Aivazovsky and Vasily Khudyakov.

Dear Alexander, thank you, but tell me what the signs point to the picture you negatively on the authorship Aivazovsky. I have information that is Aivazovsky and his disciple, perhaps Latri. If writing is not one person, that is, whether a painting showing signs of brush Aivazovsky? If writing is not one person, it is not surprising that it can find signs of involvement of the two, but it is important to have a hand Aivazovsky. Thank you in advance if you would draw your attention and say what evidence pointed specifically to you to separate yourself Aivazovsky to this object.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Emigrant, who 1896 of birth?

Yes, that is, born 1896 Cyril, please tell us, and in St. Petersburg has the same gos.uchrezhdeniya, which could be technological expertise? Thank you for the address

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Denisss, technology is?
Probably, in Russian affairs. But museums have banned give expert opinions.
Perhaps, if you need it technology, not art criticism and they do not issue resolutions?
Call them Tula, learn, be they something prompt.

[Дениссс]

Сообщение от Vivien

The second letter in the word "Rome" is more like "I", and then sealed the same color ink as the signature. Waves in the background level for Aivazovsky completely delitanski written.

That's what I downloaded, note the inscription peredpodpisyuv left corner of the picture below. I noticed napodpis actually wrote another. Although at different times on paintings signatures differ.

[мистер-у]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Denisss, technology is?
Probably, in Russian affairs. But museums have banned give expert opinions.
Perhaps, if you need it technology, not art criticism and they do not issue resolutions?
Call them Tula, learn, be they something prompt.

Cyril you a little bit wrong.
July 24 withdrew from the GRM three conclusions on very serious about the work of three raboty.Vse podtverdilis.Podpisali G. Goldovsky, S.V.Rimskaya-Korsakov and drugie.Ekspertiza conducted complex.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Mr-y

Kirill you a little bit wrong.

I am glad that they are.
There was a time when the ban.
Ok.