The ups and downs of bovine carcasses

[Meister]

not too lazy, climbed into the history of sales.
from 1989 to 2001, similar work (carcasses) appeared 4 times.
1. "A piece of beef" in 1922 appeared in 1995 at Christies. Estimate: 300-400 thousand dollars Sold: over 460 thousand dollars
2. "Taurus" in 1941 in 1998 at Sothebys. Score: 20-30 thousand pounds. Result: not sold
3. "Meat counter of 1919 at Christie's. Score: 180-220 thousand dollars Result: not sold
4. "Plucked goose" (a terrible terribly) 1926 in 2001 at Sotheby's. Score 35-45 thousand pounds. Result: not sold (before selling out in 1998 for 38 thousand pounds)


So, the old woman successfully escaped )))))))))))))))

[fross]

We ought to find the heirs of the owner who bought the work for 88000 and then to the heirs to "deceive" the old woman left ear of the herring. She's just been ripped off the previous owner resold the work for 1000000!

[Meister]

Сообщение от LCR

As for the comparison of portraits of carcasses also do not agree - the portraits of all genres, in principle, most trudnoprodavaemye, especially for men - well, no? - A carcass is very famous.

Liana, well, perhaps "servant of the Maxima can be compared with a bull's carcass? Although, I confess, the most expensive piece of the artist is a "bull's carcass" in 1924, sold in February 2006 at Christie for 7 million pounds, with Estimé 4-4,8 million

[LCR]

Сообщение от Meister

I confess, the most expensive piece of the artist is a "bull's carcass" in 1924, sold in February 2006 at Christie for 7 million pounds, with Estimé 4-4,8 million

Well, as you say

[voloviks]

Сообщение от Meister

Although, I confess, the most expensive piece of the artist is a "bull's carcass" in 1924, sold in February 2006 at Christie for 7 million pounds, with Estimé 4-4,8 million

In 2004 the museum bought the painting, then ....

LCR ... that after smetri their mother in 2007, they discovered that she cheated

And in 2004 prior to the sale at Christie them all right? "

[Кирилл Сызранский]

voloviks, yet I clearly ... Or not?

Сообщение от LCR

Over time, the picture has become more expensive, and in May 2004, Ms. Shefner sold it for $ 1 million, and six months later the Washington National Gallery bought it for 2 million

[voloviks]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

voloviks, yet I clearly ... Or not?

Quote:
Message from LCR
Over time, the picture has become more expensive, and in May 2004, Ms. Shefner sold it for $ 1 million, and six months later the Washington National Gallery bought it for 2 million

A lawsuit was filed 3 years after purchase paintings National Gallery. For three years they did not know that "baushku" deceived, and after the sale at Christie came up to them. So what, right?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от voloviks

For three years they did not know that "baushku" deceived, and after the sale at Christie came up to them. So-if?

Yes, it turns out.

Сообщение от LCR

The heirs of Ms. Shefner argue that after smetri their mother in 2007, they discovered that she had been deceived. They filed a lawsuit against two mediators - the New York expert on Soutine, and Maurice Techmena Truth Dyunou who participated in the sale of paintings by Ms. Shefner and buy its National Gallery, as well as against most of the National Gallery.

[voloviks]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Quote:
Note from voloviks
For three years they did not know that "baushku" deceived, and after the sale at Christie came up to them. So what, right?

Yes, it turns out.


Quote:
Message from LCR
Heirs of Ms. Shefner argue that after smetri their mother in 2007, they discovered that she had been deceived. They filed a lawsuit against two mediators - the New York expert on Soutine, and Maurice Techmena Truth Dyunou who participated in the sale of paintings by Ms. Shefner and buy its National Gallery, as well as against most of the National Gallery.

Question: How many years until they will reach that they cheated their lawyer. I bet that the idea of suing the museum it was he who planted them.

[Jasmin]

Сообщение от voloviks

How many years until they will reach that they cheated their lawyer. I bet that the idea of suing the museum it was he who planted them.

They were not cheated ... The excessive greed leads to sad results. From the Museum of the heirs of the old woman will be judged a thousand years, and the millions that prudently grandmother poimela from the sale of paintings, will be spent on lawyers and court costs ... Conclusion: human stupidity is eternal and infinite!