Be the Impressionists at the Hermitage

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от U_Z

Cyril, whose indication?
Can be personal.

Yes, I'll answer here.

Director of the State Museum of Fine Arts.
Pushkin may carry out the instructions of only one person on whose confidant she was on the presidential elections in Russia in 2012 - Vladimir Putin.

[uriart]

Cyril Syzransky, bullshit!

Antonov tried to raise this topic is not the first time.

And it was before Putin.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от uriart

Cyril Syzransky, bullshit!

Perhaps you know better.

Сообщение от uriart

Antonov tried to raise this topic is not the first time.

 And where is she " tried to raise this issue "? Where and when? Please give references on these efforts and I am by looking at them, I admit that my words "bullshit".
Ms. Antonova also says that this topic has already raised it before, but where and when? In your kitchen or in your office with your employees?

Сообщение от uriart

And it was before Putin.

It was under Brezhnev? Or under Gorbachev? Or maybe she was doing its attempts at Yeltsin? When, uriart, remind?

Just expensive uriart, director of the Pushkin Museum Antonov itself says something interesting:

"came to me with the suggestion that it is possible to raise this issue at a meeting with the President", - told the radio station "Echo of Moscow" the director of the Museum of Fine Arts Pushkin Irina Antonova, the issue of the transfer of part of the collection of the Hermitage in Moscow to re-create the Museum of New Western Art. This question is raised in a straight line with Vladimir Putin. Who exactly asked her to ask such a question to the president, the director of the Museum named after Pushkin refused to clarify.

(a)

Here's to you and

Сообщение от uriart

bullshit!

 <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[uriart]

I do not remember when she talked about it.
It seems that even in the Gorbachev era.
But the conversation was not on the presidential level. And so, slipped somewhere in the ether. Whether to transfer what is .....
No, I do not remember.
But personally, I liked the idea back then.

Tell me please!
And it is very important that Putin will store a collection of impressionists in Moscow or St. Petersburg?
It seems to me that he personally, as a civilian, as well as the President of the country no matter where and what to keep.
Especially since he's from Peter.

Perhaps she was allowed to ask this question to Putin, after having discussed it with his press secretaries.
So just out of the blue, she would not have to ask this question on the air.

And the fact that these paintings never will give heirs - so it's definitely!

During the presidency of Leonid Kuchma, the heirs Tereshchenko appealed to the authorities of Ukraine and expressed their desire to formally present a collection of his ancestor Ukraine.
But Ukrainian authorities were afraid of what and just shut up about it.
And the press was a proposal from the heirs.
But apparently Ukrainian authorities felt that why should we grant to them, if that's all, and so we have. And no one ever will not take it.

It's disgusting is this, when you read this.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от uriart; 2604651 "

And it is very important that Putin will store a collection of impressionists in Moscow or St. Petersburg ?

Putin should be removed Piotrowski .
No Picasso and Matisse , of course, no one from the Hermitage will not give up , but in the process "neotdavaniya" Piotrowski under this pretext and will be removed .
Will be removed , and the theme of the re-establishment of the Museum of New Western Art poher .

[uriart]

Cyril Syzransky, and rightly so if you take away from there Piotrowski!

Stolen there already full with him!

Enough is enough!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от uriart

And rightly so if Piotrowski will clean out!

Stolen there already full with him!

Enough is enough!

Thank you for another shot Piotrowski was called for.

[uriart]

Cyril Syzransky, Please!

I am not bloodthirsty!

[Victor-b]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky; 2604631"

Where is she "tried to bring up the subject?" Where and when? Please give references on these efforts and I am by looking at them, I admit that my words were "complete nonsense."

T. Dzyadko - Please tell me you said that the idea of ​​recreating the museum you got not today, not yesterday, and the day before yesterday. And before you talk about it with someone from the upper?

Antonov - No. I've talked to say with whom. I talked with Mr. Avdeev. Minister of ours. I spoke with Mr. Medinan. I spoke with Ms. Nabiullina. I see. Here are some ministers. This is the highest level, I do not put the problem. I would rather tell about the situation.

T. Dzyadko - A position of Mr. Medina is what it represents on this issue?

Antonov - he took to the interest in this issue, which is obvious to him was still fresh. He was not very aware of these issues. But now he's got, obviously, the indication somehow deal with the problem. I thought that my case to put this question. I'm really talking about it. I'll tell you frankly, now I'm really sorry, but the train was gone, I did not start talking about it at the beginning of perestroika. Somewhere in the 86-87 year. I am sure that if the issue would have been resolved quite differently.

All interviews: http://www.echo.msk.ru/programs/exit/1068300-echo/

By the way, very interesting.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Victor-b

All interviews: http://www.echo.msk.ru/programs/exit/1068300-echo/

Yes, I have about the same - it " talked to ":

I spoke with Mr. Avdeev.
Minister of ours.
I spoke with Mr. Medinan.
I spoke with Ms. Nabiullina.
I see.