Gentlemen, do you think?

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от Marassa

... and did not win, but lost (c) <! - ~ 6 ~ ->

Uh-huh.
My favorite anecdote.

[ФОН БАРТ]

Some members of the forum are in the black square Malevicha.v which even parrots can not keep because temno.chto be communion has light with darkness

[zarajara]

Сообщение от Fon BART

Some members of the forum appear in a black box Malevicha.v which even parrots can not keep because temno.chto be communion has light with darkness

BACKGROUND Bart, do not be so nervous. We talk quite friendly .
You wanted opinions. That's it. We had to write : "I want a good opinion ."
"light -dark " , you know, kitsch version image does not suggest an artist involved in the world.
And to talk about the need to learn to Malevich .

PS . I love his Fedechka and consider him handsome - so it was a compliment >

[fabosch]

BACKGROUND BART, in the end, the whole thing in context.
In the context of the forum of your work , in fact, look like a monstrous kitsch. Simply there , like, a little more business. Here, at the very least , what kind of a no, but still about art.
Maybe you were wrong forum ?
Maybe better to go somewhere on the forum fans of the royal family (do not know, probably something that is)?

[ФОН БАРТ]

When Vasnetsov painted Three Heroes

Added after 8 minutes
at that time called kitsch.
A time will put everything in its place.
Malevich in darkness obvel kvadrat.a why not light squared?
and because people stole from the truth and grace for you banal mountains lesa.tsari Russian nature and directed your way to nowhere.
A kiss in the beak Fedechka always

[Solovlad]

Colleagues, stop stop!
That we are not there, zaguglit '.
Have no right to engage in moralizing, but still wanted us to treat each other with respect.
And the jokes and humor gladly welcome!
From SW.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от BACKGROUND BART

that can be communion has light with darkness

That's a valid comparison: Malevich - the artist and it is light, and the king of Blood in boots - darkness.

[Alex_SG]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

This is a valid comparison: Malevich - the artist and it is light, and the king of Blood in boots - the darkness.

Wait a minute! This is the inflection point.
First, these two historical figures can not be compared, as they are completely in different historical strata.
Second, if even compare, what is known Malevich vast majority of people? "Black Square"? Not a significant part of them if it exerts even remember the white or red square.
But there is in his biography are times, such as:
he never failed: he entered the Moscow School of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture, which at the time was going through its peak. There taught Serov, Korovin and other great teachers. Malevich four (!) Times there have done, but was unable to. Particularly weak he was in the picture. So, the circumstances were not favorable to him, but the man changed everything. When he arrived in Moscow, I was at first not the strongest, not the most brilliant artist. But he was a man who gathered around him innovatively minded, energetic people, and wherever he appeared, event-life became.
 Even his own biography, he tried to rewrite. For example, the famous art critic asserted that time, the curator of his exhibition Theodore Davydova that he studied at the Moscow School of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture, although it was not. That, I think, - the main feature of his character and his destiny.
So against Tsar Nicholas 2 in "bloody boots" for information:
Victims of "blood" of the tsarist regime
For 1905-1913gg. in Russia have been sentenced to death 6871 people, of which 2981 were executed, ie less than half, the rest of the death penalty was commuted to penal servitude. On average, during this period, Russia had 331 executions a year.
http://protown.ru/information/hide/6634.html
In addition to executions by the court during the suppression of uprisings and demonstrations over the years of the reign of Nicholas II killed 17 582 people.
Such drastic measures imperial government were the answer to the revolutionary terror of the early 20th century. During the 1901-1907 period the revolutionaries were made tens of thousands of terrorist attacks, which killed more than 9000 people. Among them were not only the highest officials of the state, often the victims were random people.

Well, about his "modest contribution" in the field of demography, agriculture, industry, etc. I will not talk about it and know so much.

So, let's not compare the incomparable!
The works written not by a professional artist, it absolutely clear, but it is his vision.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Alex_SG

First of all, these two historical figures can not be compared, as they are a completely different historical strata.

Can be compared.

[zarajara]

Сообщение от Fon BART

When Vasnetsov painted Three Heroes

Added after 8 minutes
at that time called kitsch. A time will put everything in its place. Malevich in darkness obvel kvadrat.a why not light squared? and because people stole from the truth and grace for you banal mountains lesa.tsari Russian nature and directed your way to nowhere. A kiss in the beak Fedechka always

You really do not understand what you wrote here?
Now you're trying to take offense "for king and country"?
Write what you want: the kings of the forest, the mountains, the heroes ....
If you change your writing, it will still be kitsch.
One religion is not enough to paint an icon.
You have as much as 3 options:
1.Pisat icons - that is, strictly adhere to the canons and in the iconography and style.
2.Pisat painting in a realistic manner, but not image.
3.Pisat paintings in the style of "primitive", but not in a realistic manner.

For the first two need a school: 1. iconography, 2 academic.
Have the appropriate educational institution, or as an option - to find a master and go to his disciples.
3 options for the special school is not necessary, but we must realize that such a primitive and once and for all abandon transfer images in the paintings, and copying other people's work.

Right, do not you remember the names of the great (Malevich, Vasnetsov, etc.) due to their creativity.