Pre-funk, School of San Francisco

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

"Pirogov", sleeping in a chair from the Saratov Museum, and the early "Preparing for the exam".

Sleeping in the chair "is, perhaps," Portrait of Nadya Repin "? More in Saratov like no.
H here Pirogov-81-year, and preparation-just too early 64th?
Where are those of a "best"?

Добавлено через 3 минуты

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

In translation Geleskula for the History of Aesthetics in monuments and documents ".

Understand, the 91st, the
It was still a 89-m publishing a translation of "The uprising of the masses" in the journal Problems of Philosophy ", first in Russian. Without specifying an interpreter.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

In translation Geleskula for the History of Aesthetics in monuments and documents ".

Understand, the 91st, the
It was still a 89-m publishing a translation of "The uprising of the masses" in the journal Problems of Philosophy ", first in Russian. Without specifying an interpreter.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

"Sleeping in the chair" is, perhaps, "Portrait of Nadya Repin"? More in Saratov like no.
But, that's Pirogov-81-year, and preparation-just too early 64th?
Where are those of a "best"?

Nadia Repin - also a great thing, but sleeping in a chair - this type of faith, or what?
Old age - no joy, lazhanulsya little about the Saratov Museum.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Age - no joy, lazhanulsya little about the Saratov Museum.

Come on you from behind my back-to-ceiling shelves with albums and catalogs, I feel better, dived into the book and remembered everything.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Comrade Early Day, as he said some artist: "Painting is written or easily - or never written."

Repin wrote easily and with pleasure.

He certainly went the realism of Velasquez, Chardin, and Edouard Manet (early).

"Realism" sf-school differs from the realism of, say, Guardi, in your opinion?

[rainyday]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Comrade early day, as he said some artist: "Painting is written or easy - or never written."

Repin wrote easily and with pleasure.

He certainly went the realism of Velasquez, Chardin, and Edouard Manet (early).

"Realism" sf-school differs from the realism of, say, Guardi, do you think?

the artist wrote - that is his business
someone writes easily, but someone has to necessarily to suffer

but how he looks when writing - it is another question

Does he look for as the fact
What you need to carefully follow

or how that can be arbitrarily changed
depending on whether
what interests the artist at the moment

and in both cases this interaction
why I do not think the border between abstraction and realism
this Chinese wall

but the figure at the window Repin
and the figure at the window Dibenkorna - they are simply different
and are on different laws
Is not it obvious?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от rainyday

but the figure at the window Repin
and the figure at the window Dibenkorna - they are simply different
exist according to different laws

You want to persistently say: a figure at the window comrade. Chardin and the figure at the window comrade. Dibenkorna - they, too, about various things and different laws?

That's what I can not get from you.

Or do you want to say that Comrade Dibenkorna figure and windows - this is conditional icons, like a comrade. Klee, for example? that they are closer to Comrade. Klee, than to Comrade. Shardeni?

[rainyday]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

You want to persistently say: a figure at the window comrade. Chardin and the figure at the window comrade. Dibenkorna - they, too, about various things and different laws?

That's what I can not get from you.

Or do you want to say that Comrade Dibenkorna figure and windows - this is conditional icons, like a comrade. Klee, for example? that they are closer to Comrade. Klee, than to Comrade. Shardeni?

Klee and Chardin here in my well at anything
rather it is closer to Matisse
reshetochka out the window - before his torn
with a hint of how it seems

Вложение 691301Вложение 691311

what I especially love Dibenkorna
is his simplicity and ordinariness
no symbolism, no American flags,
hot dogs and muffins on a plate,
no before and after the stories - "narativnyh"
females: at the windows - that seems to be banal,
but the painting!

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от rainyday

Klee and Chardin here in my well at anything
rather it is closer to Matisse

Personally, I do not see much difference between Matisse and Velasquez.

No wonder the heir Velasquez Serov loved Matisse pretty soon - for the freshness, etc.

And your sf-artists, they have pictures of some tormented, and color - as a flap, deaf, that you Ryazhskiy.

[rainyday]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Personally, I do not see much difference between Matisse and Velasquez.

This is because, as Velasquez and Rembrandt
their own way too abstractionists
(in a good way)

Added after 8 minutes

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

And your sf-artists, they have pictures of some tormented, and color - as a flap, deaf, that you Ryazhskiy.

you know that I am in this with you strongly disagreed