My Anti-Gallery (pictures, which I did not like)

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от artcol

Technically, there is a lock.

There, there!

[artcol]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

There, there!

You do not know, but you can assume that there is.
Who know little, the stronger sleeping.

[Laura]

Сообщение от Maskit

Laura, thank you, that caught my idea to display images that you do not like. Art in the subject has grown many times over. If still show that, from what you just sick, then we will pick up to the great truth of art.

Who do you take me for UTB? Why expressive vocabulary, nausea, vomiting, etc.? I razyve somewhere here "art" of something or whom you responded here? I did not swear to those who clearly hostile to me. The meaning of that? Although it could-have experience of online battles . But I'm not interested, it would be better to spend the energy of self-creation etu.

Sobsno prelude to this the fact that I I have no pr ava write about the fact that man has made, that I'm sick of it /tear /turns /omerzyaet /ochumlyaet and t n Man created. All. What happened, happened. Anti-gallery for art, not for art, for even untalented person can create something worthwhile, if you provide the statistics. The more make-the more likely occurrence if not a masterpiece, it's very good work.

I just want to show that, in my humble opinion, a layman, I would not be something that is not bought, but had not picked up for free

Yes, there is about protection-bypass can copy a page on your desktop, then open it in the "Notepad" - there are pages written in html-language, watch where lock nafik erase it, and open it again in the browser format. This version of the page will have no protection, and copiers, Che likes guessed herself from such a little thing, no one does not suggest to me

Добавлено через 2 часа 5 минут
Prozholzhu with ...


And along with that he has a great work, especially in the 1st period.

[Laura]

Continue with ...


And along with that he has a great work, especially in the 1st period.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Laura

Continue with ...


And along with that he has a great work, especially in the 1st period.

It all works fine, it's just to feel.
By the way, any job you can not have.
Philistinism.
The Elephant and the lap-dogs.

[Laura]

Сообщение от Pavel

It all works fine , it's just to feel . By the way, any job you can not have. Philistinism . The Elephant and the lap-dogs .

So. Sach will slowly and methodically break your argument (in the case , the greatest bank of its occurrence, and not by words such as throwing no taste, to feel , and pr.labudy )
 Where do you see the beauty in these pictures ? Where? Colors that pressuyuyusche - dekadanskie , in the eyes of all replete , FIG make out what the picture, even if you want to. I like the audience is not interested in digging into the brains of the artist or writer, to think out what he had in mind , or did not. I want thought- image, image - gvoz to immediately hammered into the brain and stuck in the memory. IMHO it is art. The rest , I'm sorry , intellectual masturbation.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

In the USSR in the 30s inexperienced and often poorly educated audience, unaccustomed to the soul, so to speak, work, offered artless formula all that clear - bad and not worth breaking my head over this.
We are now reaping the fruit - any example, painting beyond simple nature of assimilation mass audience is not clear.
Whether the case has arisen on the basis of clear literary mass public art classicism, romanticism, the Wanderers, the symbolism - all adults on the ideas of poets and philosophers, writers and critics.
But the vanguard came from the depths of the painting itself, it is, of course, understand that the public is more complicated.
That painting can describe - to get there, aesthetic treatise or essay, as there is already something being said.
But the avant-garde is a beautiful article, auxiliary impervious to some text, I think.
True, the avant-garde artists themselves justified in their writings their directions in theory, but so complex and require a new theme and terminology appropriate - and also challenging and new.
Hence, it is clear, and the reluctance to read it all - nor Malevich or Kandinsky or Filonov.
And it is written for more than the artists themselves to the public.
A lack of understanding of modern painting porazhdaet situation where the viewer and the creator of one time speak different languages, we often have the opportunity to watch and on the forum.
So is it worth forum turned into an educational program?
Participants can come here, proudly exhibited in their subjects masterpieces of world art as "pictures that did not like" to catch up first at home, read some books?
What we get as a result of the forum, if we
a) To immediately lectures for beginners or
b) respond to nerve like this theme?
Nothing good, I think.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Laura; 2241581"

The rest , I'm sorry , intellectual masturbation.
__________________

 He remembered the term ( idiom ): "vulture culture".
They understand .

Сообщение от Pavel; 2241501"

It all works fine , it's just to feel . By the way, any job you can not have. Philistinism . The Elephant and the lap-dogs

Well, as Pussy rayot and Pavel <! - ~ 1 ~ -> (if you go to the next step) ..

Added after 22 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2241631"

Is it any forum turned into an educational program ?

also correct , so the dilemma ... if the theme just quietly existed (with appropriate introduction ), it would be interesting to watch silently .. But in the current circumstances it seems impossible .. Went pecking , including protection ... and as always, the "missing subject"

Added after 35 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2241631 "

b) the nerve to respond to such of the topic ?

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2241631"

Nothing good , I think the market with some ugly habalistymi saleswomen collective farmers .

and they also

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2241631"

catch up first at home , read some books ?

on etiquette and culture of communication ..

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

In the USSR in the 30's of the inexperienced and often poorly educated audience, unaccustomed to the soul, so to speak, work, offered artless formula all that clear - bad and not worth breaking over this head.
We are now reaping the fruit - any example, painting beyond simple nature of assimilation mass audience is not clear.
Whether the case has arisen on the basis of literary clear our public art classicism, romanticism, the Wanderers, the symbolism - all adults on the ideas of poets and philosophers, writers and critics.
But the vanguard came from the depths of the painting itself, it is, of course, understand that the public is more complicated.
That painting can describe - to get there, aesthetic treatise or essay, as there is already something being said.
But the avant-garde is a beautiful article, auxiliary impervious to some text, I think.
True, the avant-garde artists themselves justified in their writings their directions in theory, but so complex and require a new theme and terminology appropriate - and also challenging and new.
Hence, it is clear, and the reluctance to read it all - nor Malevich or Kandinsky or Filonov.
And it is written for more than the artists themselves to the public.
A lack of understanding of modern painting porazhdaet situation where the viewer and the creator of one time speak different languages, we often have the opportunity to watch and on the forum.

So is it worth forum turned into an educational program?
Participants can come here, proudly exhibited in their subjects masterpieces of world art as "pictures that did not like" to catch up first at home, read some books?
What we get as a result of the forum, if we
a) To immediately lectures for beginners or
b) respond to nerve like this theme?
Nothing good, I think the market with some ugly habalistymi saleswomen collective farmers.

By the way, this post I address not only the forum, but the site's administration.

I agree. You can say a lot but do not need. It's useless.

[Fed]

And I think that theme is interesting in terms of approach and understanding of art , people are not functionaries of the art market.
If Laura is expanded to describe his opinion.
And, if possible , such as sign pictures.

P.S. I do not think that the dolls promising direction. I think that the more promising things on a joint "DPI " and the Arts. To illustrate this idea can not yet offer the look - and Leonid Purygin latest incredible work of Oksana Mas.
This direction has a value in itself , as opposed to art , ie see what "money Ploce " can create a talented person , not just a virtuoso in the profession, and it is interesting to the masses , as opposed to the dolls.
By the way, women are afraid of dolls as no surprise , as men ...