Private collections at the Pushkin

[Барвиха]

Thank you!
Pyotr Aven, just a unique collection! Somehow, I do not understand, among such a masterpiece, the middle peasants Bondarenko! Strange!
Everything else on 10 points!

[Konstantin]

At the request , keep photos .
A large section of European painting.
Antonov in his speech noted among collectors roll in the direction of Europe. And the exhibition reflects this fact ( she says ), so with one hand .
On the other - if we could gather all the relevant collections can and there would be no bias.

Number of function Goryaschenko

Three . Ulm ? about 1500
4. Bekerel before 1662
Five . Rubens (workshop )
6. Stalbemt
7. Abraham Janssens
Eight . Abraham Govarts France and Frannie
9. Govarts
10. Pieter Bruegel billion . (workshop )

[Konstantin]

Number of function Goryaschenko - continued


A.
Pieter Bruegel billion.

Two.
Pieter Bruegel billion.
(Workshop)

Three.
Saver

4.
Senior Mostaert

Five.
Karnelis Peters Run

6.
Hondekuter

7.
Heremans

Eight.
Ruisdael

9.
Van der Hoek

10.
Heremans

Добавлено через 7 минут
Number of function Goryaschenko - continued


A.
Cornelis

Two.
Berkheyde

Three.
1480

4.
Stetter

Five.
Van Cleve

[Konstantin]

Number tion Goryaschenko - continued


1.
Cornelis

2.
Berkheyde

3.
1480

4.
Stetter

5.
Van Cleve

[parsley]

The exhibition is very impressive . Ebenezer , of course, presented as the best, in a light room, the first star (other in depth, not winning ), but then gave a magnificent work . A " Bench " Konchalovsky's what it takes , nothing of Petrov- Vodkin did not speak. And as far as I know, he rarely anything of his on the show provides.
Another thought that it does not matter to attend to like this or that direction or do not like. Lempicka can not love , is not interested in the West , or in the icon at the forefront to understand nothing - still the overall impression is not formed from the impressions of each picture, and feel the power of private collections in general. And then sometimes after visiting auctions and galleries began to seem that between the " museum " and "market" art - the gulf. And on this show go and get this - like or not, they have a common world.

Added after 4 minutes

Сообщение от Yan

Sulfur little forgotten.
Sorry, at a press conference called it the appearance of a sensation in the area of ​​Russian collectibles.
And the truth - the country has only one there.
The Hermitage))).

You are just about oil?
And then the schedule, for example, know more, and also in private hands ...
<! - ~ 12 ~ ->

[Синица]

Сообщение от fabosch

And there is sulfur ?

Yes , there is.

Сообщение от parsley

You are just about oil? And then the schedule, for example, know more, and also in private hands ... <! - ~ 12 ~ ->

Jana had a view of the museum . Graphics Sulfur is no less important . Interestingly, there?
And who is interesting , too.

Posted 9 minutes

Сообщение от parsley; 2078381"

Aven , of course, presented as the best, in a light room, the first star (other in depth, not winning ), but then gave a magnificent work . A " Bench " Konchalovsky's what it takes , nothing of Petrov- Vodkin did not speak .

Ebenezer , of course , the best. I only just Workbench does not like ( I do about the Petrov- Vodkin did not say ... )
In Avena one of the best paintings in the exhibition, in my opinion, "Venus" Mashkov. Even the best . Sorry, could not resist ... <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[parsley]

Сообщение от Tit

Graphics Sulfur is no less important.
Interestingly, there?

Everything is as it should be: park, river, people ...

Сообщение от Tit

And who is interesting, too.

Well, the questions you ask.
:-D