How is the ranking and the prestige of the museum?

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

I would not " cling ", I cite an example from today's forum .
Here you have a pair of " reference ": Petrov- Vodkin and Kustodiev . Russian artists of a generation - born in one year on the Volga, died of a disease in Leningrad, Kuzma Sergeevich, clarify , Boris Mikhailovich lived for 12 years.
Compare them , artcol.
And then compare them with another of the same age as the Volga , with Paul Varfolomeyevich Kuznetsov , whom he survived for so many have already died in the 68th year. Compare .

Cyril, a reference to the CPV will be in my opinion - Deineka , Samokhvalov .

For Kuznetsova - Sarian , Serov , Korovin (about , yet I am not an art critic ).

For Kustodiev - Somov, Benois, Borisov- Musotov (also approximately).

And beyond the domestic context - they are all from one group : the twentieth century, Russia /USSR .

That is, If you want to do an exhibition in the West Kuznetsova - you will approach those museums where the exhibition is held above the other comrades. And already from them ( museums) can choose to taste. I would do .

A place of birth and year of birth do not matter much .

[iside]

Сообщение от artcol; 2041261"

Isis , and your artist - he is on this list ?

Yeah, I was sitting on another planet if I had such artists <! - ~ 7 ~ ->
I work hard to break through one of my least in the top 30, chances are very good in all respects , if the clinical idiocy was not often a common symptom of the local Aboriginal people , it would long ago have all turned out <! - ~ 2 ~ ->

Сообщение от artcol; 2041211 '

If you plan to show it in the U.S. , I would have watched what a museum exhibit of artists such as " plan " as your (s) , but it was the Americans or the Europeans by citizenship (it is possible to increase the number of of matching you to museums ). And then one of them took away suitable to you ( for example, the most tolerant to foreign actors , ie who have exhibitions of such artists .) The second part - it is just a method of Cyril .

Yes, thanks , that's me and it seems . <! - ~ 1 ~ -> Ah, job of work to be done.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol; 2041291"

for CPV will be the reference in my opinion - Deineka , Samokhvalov .

No. Deineka (1899-1969) is the "product" Soviet, in VHUTEMAS enrolled in 1920 , and the CPV of the Red Horse is a 1912 exhibition at the World of Art shows , and Samokhvalov , though he had to learn in the Academy of Arts before the revolution , all is a generation younger than the CPV and the same Soviet author .

Сообщение от artcol; 2041291"

For Kuznetsova - Sarian , Serov , Korovin (about , yet I am not an art critic ).

Saryan - yes , maybe even starting with the Scarlet rose, even with the Blue, classmates , studied together .
But certainly not with Serov and Korovin . Serov, 7 years after the Scarlet Rose is dead , he is a year with the exhibition is a recognized luminary , those exhibitors had just learned - and Saryan , and Kuznetsov , and Sapunov .

Сообщение от artcol; 2041291"

For Kustodiev - Somov, Benois, Borisov- Musotov (too roughly ).

Somov and Benoit - emigrants have done much already there - not podhoyat .
B -M while compatriot Kustodiev like , but 35 -year-old died in 1905. Also by.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

does not fit, not "reference"

Cyril, you do not kerf.
Therefore finish.
In your competence on the part of the history of art I do not need to convince, I know <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[Игорь Гурьев]

The greatest Russian artists Serov, Korovin, Konchalovsky, Petrov- Vodkin, Borisov- Musatov, Sapunov, Deineka are almost unknown in the West.

A few Russian artists of the second series in the West is very well known. This is - Kandinsky , Malevich , Chagall, Jawlensky , Goncharova , Larionov and others.

The question is , the referent is the notorious "West" ?

[artcol]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

The question is, the referent is the notorious "West"?

You know better from the inside <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol

You do not kerf.
Therefore finish.

So "kerf" teach, enlighten.

You see, I already know about the "reference".

I'm not hopeless, it is difficult, but "cut in" on the sly ...
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

So " kerf " teach , enlighten .
You see, I already know about the "reference ".
I'm not hopeless , it is difficult , but " cut in " on the sly ... <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

I kind of tried to ... Maybe the fact that you are now without the knowledge of practical benefit ? I've been a fan of such study to the Brazilian system <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[iside]

Gentlemen, I decided on the town - is Los Angeles. The choice for the reason that there are living relatives of some of my superiors , and to have their people in place - it's convenient. So, what we would have, on the basis of artfaktsa there as much as 18 Public instityushns , but suitable for my purposes only the following :

1 MOCA - The Museum of Contemporary Art - Grand Avenue
2 USC Fisher Museum of Art
3 Ben Maltz Gallery at Otis College of Art and Design
4 The Luckman Fine Arts Complex
5 Los Angeles Municipal Art Gallery
6 Angeles County Museum of Art - LACMA [/URL]
7 Hammer Museum
8 The Getty Center
9 The Geffen Contemporary at MOCA

I put them in the list just randomly in the first place as the Moku deserved and undisputed leader.
What are thoughts? <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[artcol]

Сообщение от iside

What are thoughts?
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

The method of exclusion.
For example - the museum's requests do not fit into the budget of the exhibition.