Marc Chagall original lithograph - Page 4 - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

macas · 26-01-2012, 16:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wladzislaw

Not every opinion is equally valuable. Are you sure that writers generally know what a lithograph ...?

I read the reviews in the journal of culture. In fact, they are professional art critics, but I can not guarantee for them.

Of course give them back . You would read out the amount you paid. Maybe for the same money you can buy the original problem-free .

I paid $ 500

Wladzislaw · 26-01-2012, 16:58

Alas, but for that amount signed by Chagall hand work can not be bought .

For the money you can buy a lithograph of the journal "Derriere le Miroir", their size is approx . 37h27 cm, there were lithographs , and double the size of a reversal , but it's such a magazine and lithographs have an inflection in the middle. Also lithographs of the books , the size of ca. 20 cm of course , without signatures, but fixed directory

Evgen248 · 06-11-2012, 12:06

Dear experts, you can be asked to comment on , I do not understand how such "suggestions" to treat.

Here are three suggestions ibeevskih , trades with them is over, just below the page should scroll .

1.

2.

3.

First and second work - is supposedly Chagall lithograph "Portrait Vavy ." 3rd work also , allegedly, lithography, but other work. But here is the backdrop to the third article of the same number as in the first two.

Also, if you look at real portrait Vavy , he, as it were, on the contrary , that is, She left hand leans on the chair , not the rule , as in these " lithographs ." Besides, the picture is dated 1966 year, and these " lithography" 1940.

What is it and why pay for it for two thousand dollars?

Thank you.

Wladzislaw · 07-11-2012, 02:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evgen248

What is it and why pay for it for two thousand dollars?

Fufel.
For idiots.

Sergeymb · 18-03-2014, 10:08

On the occasion of this work went Chagall.
Prompt what period applies?
Valuable or not?
I would be grateful for any information!

Wladzislaw · 19-03-2014, 18:06

Reproduction /leaf from the book, most likely.

Sergeymb · 20-03-2014, 11:24

Here, found:

MARC CHAGALL 1952 ANTIQUE FIRST EDITION LITHOGRAPH - PUBLISHED 1952 IN ERETZ ISRAEL FOR THE 1ST EDITION OF THE RARE HEBREW-YIDDISH-RUSSIAN-JEWISH POETRY BOOK "SIBERIA" BY ABRAHAM SUTZKEVER ILLUSTRATED BY MARC CHAGALL - IMAGE SIZE APPX 8.5 "X 9.5" - PROFESSIONALLY
FRAMED & MATTED - SIGNED IN THE PLATE

http://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/...que-lithograph

Wladzislaw · 20-03-2014, 14:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sergeymb

Here, found

Search does not need the Internet, and in catalogs, not to be defrauded of simpletons.

Кирилл Сызранский · 26-03-2015, 22:23

[QUOTE="Wladzislaw;1935781"]is the Only certificate that confirms the signature can only be issued by the Fund Chagall. All the rest is waste paper. If you believe in a fraction of a percent - please contact the Fund Sagala@
[QUOTE][FONT="Georgia"]This would all exhausts, if not for the incredible generosity of the Society has stepped on a positive expertise. Can't say I'm surprised such leniency to some obvious compilazione points in recognized for this genuine institution of the paintings.
The fact is that recently signed Chagall was protected as the logo of a famous brand products. By the way, the Fund's experts had full legal right to destroy the fakes as counterfeit products.
The author of these lines was a witness to the destruction of expert photoshop fake paintings by Chagall in "President Hotel" 10 years ago.
Acid from the aerosol container.
No one in no time.
I remember thinking then I feel sad about insignificant percentage of the survival probability of a foreign specialist. But no, just as quickly were filed various documents with seals and armorial forms. Just did a lawyer and my sorry heart finally relieved.
This year, all that meaningful peer tinsel ceases to cost expires because the Statute of limitations. Now the legacy Chagall belongs to the world and not just a panel of experts 9/10 which the lawyers.
Forgery immediately got out of the bins and filled gullible European market. Not recognized by the specialists, rejected technologists restorers, bad execution, - all that were excluded by the Fund Chagall suddenly showed up on TEFAF in all its sassy Kruse@
Kirill Alekseev

Wladzislaw · 27-03-2015, 16:05

Once the confusion and horror stories.

06-11-2012, 12:06	Original language: Russian #33
Evgen248 Новичок Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 1 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Reputation: 0	Dear experts, you can be asked to comment on , I do not understand how such "suggestions" to treat. Here are three suggestions ibeevskih , trades with them is over, just below the page should scroll . 1. 2. 3. First and second work - is supposedly Chagall lithograph "Portrait Vavy ." 3rd work also , allegedly, lithography, but other work. But here is the backdrop to the third article of the same number as in the first two. Also, if you look at real portrait Vavy , he, as it were, on the contrary , that is, She left hand leans on the chair , not the rule , as in these " lithographs ." Besides, the picture is dated 1966 year, and these " lithography" 1940. What is it and why pay for it for two thousand dollars? Thank you. Last edited by Evgen248; 06-11-2012 at 16:25.

18-03-2014, 10:08	Original language: Russian #35
Sergeymb Новичок Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 8 Thanks: 2 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Reputation: 0	What say about this work of Chagall? On the occasion of this work went Chagall. Prompt what period applies? Valuable or not? I would be grateful for any information!

20-03-2014, 11:24	Original language: Russian #37
Sergeymb Новичок Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 8 Thanks: 2 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Reputation: 0	It looks like the original lithograph Here, found: MARC CHAGALL 1952 ANTIQUE FIRST EDITION LITHOGRAPH - PUBLISHED 1952 IN ERETZ ISRAEL FOR THE 1ST EDITION OF THE RARE HEBREW-YIDDISH-RUSSIAN-JEWISH POETRY BOOK "SIBERIA" BY ABRAHAM SUTZKEVER ILLUSTRATED BY MARC CHAGALL - IMAGE SIZE APPX 8.5 "X 9.5" - PROFESSIONALLY FRAMED & MATTED - SIGNED IN THE PLATE http://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/...que-lithograph Last edited by Sergeymb; 20-03-2014 at 14:07.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Exhibition of lithographs by Marc Chagall in Saint-Petersburg	Елизавета	Exhibitions and events	0	06-06-2011 13:52
Sell: Marc Chagall?	серж шевчук	Sell	2	21-01-2011 17:03
«Le Musee National Message Biblique Marc Chagall»	Люси	Фоторепортажи с выставок	5	27-07-2010 18:30
«Le Musee National Message Biblique Marc Chagall»	Люси	In pictures	5	27-07-2010 18:30
Marc Chagall on Blomsbury	Marina56	Auctions	1	11-01-2009 09:58

26-01-2012, 16:58	Original language: Russian #32
Wladzislaw Гуру Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Беларусь, Минск Posts: 4,246 Thanks: 2,696 Thanked 2,435 Times in 1,199 Posts Reputation: 4332	Alas, but for that amount signed by Chagall hand work can not be bought . For the money you can buy a lithograph of the journal "Derriere le Miroir", their size is approx . 37h27 cm, there were lithographs , and double the size of a reversal , but it's such a magazine and lithographs have an inflection in the middle. Also lithographs of the books , the size of ca. 20 cm of course , without signatures, but fixed directory

19-03-2014, 18:06	Original language: Russian #36
Wladzislaw Гуру Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Беларусь, Минск Posts: 4,246 Thanks: 2,696 Thanked 2,435 Times in 1,199 Posts Reputation: 4332	Reproduction /leaf from the book, most likely.

26-03-2015, 22:23	Original language: Russian #39
Кирилл Сызранский Гуру Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: РФ, Самара Posts: 75,397 Thanks: 27,867 Thanked 55,330 Times in 24,283 Posts Blog Entries: 126 Reputation: 102390	[QUOTE="Wladzislaw;1935781"]is the Only certificate that confirms the signature can only be issued by the Fund Chagall. All the rest is waste paper. If you believe in a fraction of a percent - please contact the Fund Sagala@ [QUOTE][FONT="Georgia"]This would all exhausts, if not for the incredible generosity of the Society has stepped on a positive expertise. Can't say I'm surprised such leniency to some obvious compilazione points in recognized for this genuine institution of the paintings. The fact is that recently signed Chagall was protected as the logo of a famous brand products. By the way, the Fund's experts had full legal right to destroy the fakes as counterfeit products. The author of these lines was a witness to the destruction of expert photoshop fake paintings by Chagall in "President Hotel" 10 years ago. Acid from the aerosol container. No one in no time. I remember thinking then I feel sad about insignificant percentage of the survival probability of a foreign specialist. But no, just as quickly were filed various documents with seals and armorial forms. Just did a lawyer and my sorry heart finally relieved. This year, all that meaningful peer tinsel ceases to cost expires because the Statute of limitations. Now the legacy Chagall belongs to the world and not just a panel of experts 9/10 which the lawyers. Forgery immediately got out of the bins and filled gullible European market. Not recognized by the specialists, rejected technologists restorers, bad execution, - all that were excluded by the Fund Chagall suddenly showed up on TEFAF in all its sassy Kruse@ *Kirill Alekseev*

27-03-2015, 16:05	Original language: Russian #40
Wladzislaw Гуру Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Беларусь, Минск Posts: 4,246 Thanks: 2,696 Thanked 2,435 Times in 1,199 Posts Reputation: 4332	Once the confusion and horror stories.