The new film "Our Art".

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[QUOTE="Samvel; 1635131]These famous people you are talking about are the ones who organized the chaos[/QUOTE]

What is more "chaos"?
Where "chaos"?
 
>

[size="1"]Added after 53 seconds[/size]

Сообщение от "Samvel

Then why no disturbance, which assembled, edited, cropped.

And who's got to be indignant?

[Самвел]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

What is more "chaos"?
Where "chaos"?
 

Dudakov said that his work was held under the other signature, at Sotheby's, where he also is a consultant, is that the order, this is chaos.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Samvel

And who resent a must?

Who assembled, cut, ie framed, dishonored.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Samvel

Dudakov said that his work was held under the other signature, at Sotheby's, where he also is a consultant

So he consulted the auction house of forgery under L. Popov.

And by the way, I wonder how there was actually a reality?

[uriart]

Cyril Syzransky, in his words, he has informed aukts.dom that the work submitted is not genuine.

And further, the work was sold at auction.
I understand.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "uriart

And further, the work was sold at auction.

That's interesting: when sold, for how much?

Сообщение от "uriart

I understand.

I am too.

[Fed]

Сообщение от "Cyril Syzransky

That's interesting: when sold, for how much?

By replicated "legend" it sold Sotheby's.
But in 1989 (seems to be the year of sale), Popov sold:

Phillips - Composition with guitar, 1918, 1918, oil on canvas 67.5x50 cm.

Christie's-Composition collage 18.2x12.2 cm


It turns out, most likely-Phillips.

According to "legend" sold about $ 30000.

[artart]

Сообщение от Santa

liked the film .
Especially the final phrase , the thought of this - to buy art , which is like , rather than a signature and examination ..

I reacted indifferently to the film - one and the same /the same thing .
and the final phrase did not like : hi - like this one , and the money ? and value ? this is not a dog on the shelf .

[Artem]

Сообщение от intart1

do not have to sponsor the TV and such silly movies

Not sure if someone is sponsoring TV, moreover, they you're talking about, last year's snow did not beg. That's what I used to think that all this is just a circus, etc., including silly movies as you put it. But, it turned out wrong - after watching this movie and others like him - many, many people start to panic, recheck, treat everyone with great suspicion, etc. And, unfortunately, re-examination leads to more frustration. And this fact.
 That is the point.

Сообщение от intart1

with pictures by Hirst, Chapman brothers, Noble, Okshteyna Shimon, Haim Sokol and Belyaev-Gintovt. Gelman for this polygraph-platform in Tver prepare. And then the whole generation of future business in 2030's and beyond - your.

A brilliant text - and, in my opinion, good advertising is just for these Hurst, Chapman, Simon, etc. I did not know what they are! I will now know. Thank you.
 I can give a good example .- Rosokhrankultura issued a "Catalogue of fraud" were full when the headlines. But when the headlines began to appear - "Antique dealers against the Catalogue of forgery"
- Catalogs are starting to buy boxes. That's advertising! Massive advertising and totally free. They are of such a dream could not ...
"What is worse - the better!" It is this concept lies at the heart of all these publications as ". Catalogue fakes" and understand why. But the main thing is that, although on their side wants it .-
someone or not, but it is.

Сообщение от intart1; 1634991"

And no one will remember any of Savrasov with his rooks, nor about "The Ninth Wave by Ivan Aivazovsky, nor about levitanovsky Mart and others like them, and the Institute of Russian art expertise will wither away by itself . Game over. Objective achieved.

You are right. Of course, no one will remember. Just one moment - think there will be nothing. Given that some experts get up with the issue of expert opinions ... -

Сообщение от Samvel

If counterfeiting, forgery, deception, reached such proportions as the love to confess in the film, then blame Shishkin, Dudakova and the like, and there's no fairy tale love to confess here.

Dear Samvel.
The scope and so well seen ... and this film does not score. And who's to blame and what is ... - a moot point ... And the rest I fully agree with you.

Posted 1 minute

Сообщение от Samvel; 1635151"

circumcised, ie framed, dishonored.

What do you mean? Do not know.

[Santa]

The owners of the Moscow gallery "Triumph" share the secrets of the art of marketing.

The founders of the gallery "Triumph" Yemelyan Zakharov, Dmitry Hankin put the task to change public taste. Dmitry Hankin: "We can not fartsevat from the trunk - all point. You can not get a thing in a million out of the trunk, even if it is Bentley, and show it somewhere in a secluded corner of the cafe, taking out trash bag with rags adhering tape. And the person you accordingly, the money in newspaper reports. or in a box from under the "Panasonic". Of course, there are still runners and Zhigunov, as we call them, which was attached to some kind of financial channels and are just there, in the cabinets. sit for hours in the waiting room, and then charge these prices that we, the scoundrel, it becomes uncomfortable. We do not know how and do not want to be able to. We are ambitious to believe that we must change public taste. "

On the question of how to define art, which deals with gallery Triumph, Dmitry Hankin said: "Much art in the grand style. Who have recently been absent en masse. We are consistent proponents of figurative art, consistent supporters of a rather simple criterion - the beauty." Among other things, Yemelyan Zakharov recanted his words (such as in an interview with "big city" without partiality, he said on Russian art), said: "About the Russian contemporary art, I did not say anything. I spoke about classical Russian art. Yes I do not like. A contemporary - it is beautiful, because it is in the mainstream. "

[Artem]

Сообщение от Santa

Among other things, Yemelyan Zakharov recanted his words (such as in an interview with " big city " without partiality , he said on Russian art ), said: " About the Russian contemporary art , I did not say anything . I talked about classical Russian art . Yes , I do not like . A contemporary - it is beautiful because it is in the mainstream ".

Yemelyan Zakharov , a collector of the fifth generation. I think that Zakharov mildly disingenuous , to say about that does not like classical Russian art , just look at his unique collection of famous Russian artists , ( first name ) that he is not selling. Believe me , were eye-popping offer .... he does not have a collection of works by Hirst, Chapman brothers , Noble , Okshteyna Shimon , Haim Sokol and Belyaev - Gintovt , and this , believe me , means a lot ...