Artist Ixygon

[Seriy]

Paul, I need not burden your search. My-it or do you have it or you do not, do not need to look for. It is only necessary to improve the language of expression, m e to give "their" buy decent shape. And the story of Van Gogh, clearest evidence of this. This we believe it is a revolutionary innovator, but he considered himself a conscientious student of Millet, Delacroix, Monticelli, Mantegna, etc.
You know that one day he suddenly changed its format from 90h70-switched to 50x100. The reason? Internal illumination in search of her?
No. He saw a picture of a Puvis de Chavannes "Inter artes et naturam" created for the opening of the building, a canvas in the format 1:2.
Van Gogh wrote about how to write and what size! T e from that moment it just goes to 50x100, begins to imitate Puvisu (?) Including a color solutions, as he imitated at one time Gauguin and some others. I believe that copying of Millet, he honestly tried to understand the secret of success. It turned out, mostly horror. Two good, the rest were terrified - he lost his color, shape .. Because, perhaps, the plots are close to Mille Van Gogh from a religious point of view, but not with the beautiful? You say, Cezanne, the Impressionists, but no copies of Van Gogh, for example, Monet! though he knew it. A copy Millet had dozens! T e is not that the Impressionists and Van Gogh's Millet's teacher?
T e as a Van Gogh or tried to follow the examples of successful artists, he has turned out as always, its all I have to score. The style that we see, was obtained in spite of his efforts.
The question was not in search of self, the question was, whether it is his ego to society. The time has come, was necessary.

 The method of Van Gogh-run, with his pants at others liked the idea of ​​art - and I understand the close. If you're a good artist, then in the race will receive a good picture, if something bad did not get it. And sit back and pick something, "his" - do not know ... Because I have pictures, direct analogies that I do not know, for example, Love and Hate. Wrote and wrote, and went himself on ...

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Seriy

Paul, I need not burden your search. My-it or do you have it or you do not, do not need to look for. It is only necessary to improve the language of expression, m e to give "their" buy decent shape. And the story of Van Gogh, clearest evidence of this. This we believe it is a revolutionary innovator, but he considered himself a conscientious student of Millet, Delacroix, Monticelli, Mantegna, etc.

Читать дальше... 

You know that one day he suddenly changed its format from 90h70-switched to 50x100. The reason? Internal illumination in search of her?
No. He saw a picture of a Puvis de Chavannes "Inter artes et naturam" created for the opening of the building, a canvas in the format 1:2.
Van Gogh wrote about how to write and what size! T e from that moment it just goes to 50x100, begins to imitate Puvisu (?) Including a color solutions, as he imitated at one time Gauguin and some others. I believe that copying of Millet, he honestly tried to understand the secret of success. It turned out, mostly horror. Two good, the rest were terrified - he lost his color, shape .. Because, perhaps, the plots are close to Mille Van Gogh from a religious point of view, but not with the beautiful? You say, Cezanne, the Impressionists, but no copies of Van Gogh, for example, Monet! though he knew it. A copy Millet had dozens! T e is not that the Impressionists and Van Gogh's Millet's teacher?
T e as Van Gogh did not try to follow the examples of successful artists, he has turned out as always, I'm his score. The style that we see, was obtained in spite of his efforts.
The question was not in search of self, the question was, whether it is his ego to society. The time has come, was necessary.

 The method of Van Gogh-run, with his pants over someone else's artistic ponravivivsheysya idea - I understand and close. If you're a good artist, then in the race will receive a good picture, if something bad did not get it. And sit back and pick something, "his" - do not know ... Because I have pictures, direct analogies that I do not know, for example, Love and Hate. Wrote and wrote, and went himself on ...

I advise you to read the letter again and very carefully. Van Gogh was aware of all the advanced achievements of the art of his time and had this opinion. He was one of the most famous family and the big traders art (painting) and the largest Dutch artists. Who is Puvis de Chavannes, he knew and had seen it at least at the Salon, and can be personally known. Puvis supported the Impressionists. Van Gogh no one imitated, he applied the theory, which he regarded as correct.
50x100 size simply does not exist. The largest size of a Van Gogh-30-72h93sm. He learned this size, who considered large, only very recently.
Van Gogh never ran nowhere, it just might work quickly, this temperament.
Millet is not a religious but a peasant painter. Socialist realist. This is - sympathy for the poor and attracted the Van Gogh who had never been religious, rather he was a socialist.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Seriy; 1762813"

He saw a picture of a Puvis de Chavannes "Inter artes et naturam" created for the opening of the building, a canvas in the format 1:2.

Van Gogh, who apparently saw a small copy of this thing - 40,3 x 113,7.
Original Inter artes et naturam Pierre Puvis de Chavannes size 295 x 830, it is in the Rouen Museum of Art /musée des Beaux-Arts de Rouen.

Вложение 1351083

Сообщение от Pavel; 1762863"

This is - sympathy for the poor and attracted the Van Gogh who had never been religious, rather he was a socialist.

Me about his religious /irreligious say such facts of his biography:
1. He was so passionate about wanting to be a pastor, that his parents began to fear that her son can go crazy on religious grounds, but they had to agree with the desire of a son and they sent him to Amsterdam, where he had to prepare for exams.
2. In Amsterdam, he diligently studied under the guidance of his uncle Yoganessa Stricker, a respected and recognized theologian, getting ready to pass the entrance exam to university department of theology.
But Van Gogh was not able to overcome the ancient Greek and Latin - languages, without knowledge that it was impossible to count on a diploma theologian. His father then sent him to the Protestant missionary school in Laeken at Brussels, where he underwent a three-month course of the sermon.
3. Van Gogh in autumn 1878 went as a missionary in Borinage, the poor mining region in southern Belgium, where the poor rezdaet money and clothes, and he lives from hand to mouth and gradually begins to look like a tramp
Defeat of the "excessive zeal" by Van Gogh, the authorities in July 1879 dismissed him. His self-sacrifice of the church authorities was seen as an insult.
4. Failed preacher saying goodbye to a pastor Bonte, a few months ago, filed the "signal" of the authorities of the strange activities of the latter-day missionary, went to Brussels and walking barefoot, because the miners have long given everything he had.
"We took him for a madman, but he may have the holy", - said the pastor Bont.

[Seriy]

Paul , Are you kidding ? In Van Gogh's paintings of about 80 in size 50x100 . The most famous of them - a masterpiece of " Wheat Field under the stormy sky with crows " - Wheat Field with Crowns-50,3 cm h103
Understanding the works of Van Gogh is impossible without reference to the Bible , he always symbols - the symbol of The Sower , the earth - diggers character , Reaper is a symbol , or why would he Sower drawn a hundred times ? You did not know that Van Gogh even made his own new translation of the Bible? Another thing is that all this was combined with the far from the monastic way of life , well, in that it Ya

Cyril, thank you very much for the picture of Puvis .

[U_Z]

Сообщение от Seriy

5.
Ironic portrait.

Fifth - Gauguin?
> Enigma: The Gauguin right, and you have left?

[Seriy]

U_Z, thanks!
green self-portrait by Gauguin I did not know, a very beautiful and just see what the master-colors!
What about right-left did not think ...

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Seriy

U_Z, thanks! green self-portrait by Gauguin I did not know , a very beautiful and just see what the master - colors! What about right-left did not think ...

I heard you want to exhibit at the CHA , I can advise . In the CHA is a department of exhibitions. You go back and negotiate on the amount of space and price, and you will put in place. You have little work and can take a small room . I think the maximum 1500d . Well have to stand in line with a year or two , maybe more.

[Seriy]

Pavel, thank you very much!
I have applied for in February and passed in the spring exhibition, r e was approved in the plan of the exhibition at the coming winter.

[U_Z]

Сообщение от Seriy

What about right-left did not think ...

Eyebrow.
I thought so.

[Grigory]

Everything, everything, everything!

World, friendship,May!!!
Oh, September!