Artist Valery Rybakov

[Peter]

It is in this teme.Pochemu something like a few words to say about Gogene.Vse know that Gauguin, this self-taught, a stockbroker, reshivshiysya become an artist has made no effort to study and improve the fine iskusstva.I in 1976 (and it after about five years, he started) he presented at Salon painting "Forest in Virofle", which surprisingly many were accepted, indicating that resulted in some skill (then been rejected by the example of two works of Edouard Manet). But the recognition of it as a great creative personality came only 15 years later, in 1891godu.Byl given society luncheon, praising speech writers, the state has promised to buy some rabot.Byli raise money for the "creative assignment in Okeaniyu.Posle banquet in honor of the completion of Gauguin went along with the writer Maurice went into a cafe and Gauguin suddenly raplakalsya. "-I have never been so unhappy," muttered finally hudozhnik.-How "exclaimed Moris.-Today, when the triumph of justice, when I came to glory!-Listen to me," replied Gauguin .- Until now, I could not provide for his family and his art ... and even his iskusstvo.A today, when hope dawned for me, I'm sharper than it has ever been, I feel, what I have brought a monstrous sacrifice and how it is irretrievably ... He spoke to Maurice about his wife, children, the wound in the heart, which he hid .. .. At this moment, it can be anticipated that the last time in my life recently saw his wife and children, that his hope is to once again become husband and father is in vain that irreparable accomplished long ago. "

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Posav

I like it. Clearly better than the gray ones educational landscape. If Van Gogh is obeyed when he was told to go back to the classroom and learn to paint an egg, he stayed there would be a mediocre painter and not by reaching academics. But Van Gogh did not listen and threw plaster in the trash and develop their individuality.
Well identified in the Rose Center at the deliquescent sharpness at the edges.
Maybe a little track had fallen into the right, can bowl and pitcher are too similar in color, the colors may not exactly fit on technique, but it's stuff. Inside, the genre takes a lot of registration of colors and photographic. "If you have such a wild," not combed "painting, then the colors would suit better the field, but not roses.

Van Gogh painting all his life studying and writing. The Academy taught not to paint a painting correctly as needed. This results in a set of stamps that are very clearly seen in pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg sculpture. Van Gogh was essentially a socialist and women drawing from nature, so they were weightless nymph he disliked. Women should look like a living, can give birth to work in the field, etc.
Read the letter and you will see that he learned from the Impressionists, Post, etc in general for all his fellow artists. He was constantly drawing and anatomy too, and probably in some sort of academy in Paris. This advise.

Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от Peter

It is in this teme.Pochemu something like a few words to say about Gogene.Vse know that Gauguin, this self-taught, a stockbroker, reshivshiysya become an artist has made no effort to study and improve the fine arts. And already in 1976 (and this after about five years, he started) he presented at Salon of painting "Forest in Virofle", which surprisingly many were accepted, indicating that achieved a certain skill (then been rejected by the example of two works by Edouard Manet ). But the recognition of it as a great creative personality came only 15 years later, in a given society 1891godu.Byl luncheon, laudatory speech writers, the state has promised to buy some rabot.Byli raise money for the "creative assignment in Okeaniyu.Posle banquet in honor of the departure Gauguin went along with the writer Maurice went into the cafe and Gauguin suddenly raplakalsya. "-I have never been so unhappy," muttered finally hudozhnik.-How "exclaimed Moris.-Today, when the triumph of justice, when I came to glory!-Listen me, "replied Gogen., I still could not provide for his family and his art ... and even his iskusstvo.A today, when hope dawned for me, I'm sharper than it has ever been, I feel how terrible I brought the victim and how it irreparably ... He told Maurice about his wife, children, the wound in the heart, which he hid .. .. At this moment, it can be anticipated that the last time in my life recently saw his wife and children, that his chance of again becoming a husband and father is in vain that the irreparable is done for a long time. "

Gauguin was very canny, and when he said, thinking what he said and to whom. Maurice writer, he is not in vain crying. You see that and wrote it. It is to notice another Van Gogh, and this does not detract from the merits of Gauguin as an artist. Rules of the game.

[Peter]

Сообщение от Pavel

, and this does not detract from the merits of Gauguin as an artist.

That's exactly what I wanted to skazat.Stat artist is a big trud.Stat distinctive good artist is a colossal work, even if talanta.Primer Gauguin here pokazatelen.Posle as he learned to write, even fifteen years have passed in the development and samosovershnstvovanii, until he became Gauguin! No internet then could not stop the artist.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Peter

That's exactly what I wanted to skazat.Stat artist is a big trud.Stat distinctive good artist is a colossal work, even if talanta.Primer Gauguin here pokazatelen.Posle as he learned to write yet Fifteen years have passed in the development and samosovershnstvovanii, until he became Gauguin! No internet then could not stop the artist.

You know, the artist as it turns right. The time needed to the public was convinced of his talent, seeing his work. Shchukin said that artists need to buy until they become famous. It is a talent collector, art critic. The artist works because it can not work, but this work is the constant teaching.
Now the problem more in the absence of connoisseurs and art critics.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[QUOTE="Pavel; 1412481]Now the problem more in the absence of connoisseurs and art critics.[/QUOTE]

That's right.
Where are they?
Why can not see this [URL="http://pavelntyryshkin.narod.ru/index.html"]author[/URL]?

And maybe just as well that have not yet discerned, they glorified?

After:

Сообщение от "Pavel

Shchukin said that artists need to buy until they become famous.

[Валерий Рыбаков]

[I-V]

Сообщение от Valery Rybakov; 1421951"

And so was born painting "Memories of Summer"

Valery, I really liked your picture! It is the real power, it is felt here as your honesty. Once we see immediately that it was written by Valery Rybakov and nobody else. Fishermen - an artist who believes only yourself. In this paper, it is very noticeable. Among other things, it is simply pleasing to the eye painting. Want to watch and almost literally suck this thick, dense vegetation, these thick stems, topped with thick, like a good fried eggs, flowers.

And it seems to me a very interesting idea for this here, "nose to nose", images of vegetation. In Van Gogh, in particular, have a good picture:

[Peter]

Which is not the van gogovskaya.Est whether a link to this job?

[I-V]

Сообщение от Peter

What is not van gogovskaya.Est a link to this job?

You're right in something: the first version of lightening of some sort.
Version of

http://www.vangoghmuseum.nl/vgm/popu...on=627&lang=en probably closer to the original.

[Fed]

Сообщение от IV

the first version of lightening some.

And not for nothing - clearly original.