Mark Rothko

[redbor]

Well, M.Rotko painting sold for $ 75.1 million . Yet even a huge fan of the work and the owner M.Rotko - Ben Heller could not be called a masterpiece .

 Question to connoisseurs - and how much , then, is a masterpiece? >

 And the question to experts , understanding creativity M.Rotko :
  M.Rotko picture " Orange. Yellow ... " was sold for $ 86.9 million
And for the picture to pay 11.8 million dollars less.
 ( It's a very big number ! How can it buy more pictures !)

 Is " Royal Red and Blue " so much worse and boring than the " Orange. Yellow ... " ? Why?
 Something in her master nedokrasil ? Or because - lines not straight? >
 Someone could explain this "injustice " >

[zarajara]

Сообщение от redbor

Well , M.Rotko painting sold for $ 75.1 million . Yet even a huge fan of the work and the owner M.Rotko - Ben Heller could not be called a masterpiece .

 Question to connoisseurs - and how much , then, is a masterpiece? >

 And the question to experts , understanding creativity M.Rotko :
  M.Rotko picture " Orange. Yellow ... " was sold for $ 86.9 million
And for the picture to pay 11.8 million dollars less.
 ( It's a very big number ! How can it buy more pictures !)

 Is " Royal Red and Blue " so much worse and boring than the " Orange. Yellow ... " ? Why?
 Something in her master nedokrasil ? Or because - lines not straight? >
 Someone could explain this "injustice " >

I like your approach , I do think that it can be used as a criterion for the visual arts.
Possible or not :

1. to select the artist some work.
2. to define it as a masterpiece or checkpoint.
3. compare them

If you can not , then we see not a work of art , and the visual image of the concept.

[Seriy]

redbor, a masterpiece may not be worth anything , Van Gogh covered the hole in the henhouse , and which were not suitable for this , burned.
 The market price of the painting in the moment and artistic significance, masterpiece - a different concept , replace or merge them - naive and shortsighted.

[artcol]

Сообщение от zarajara

I like your approach , I do think that it can be used as a criterion for the visual arts.
Possible or not :

1. to select the artist some work.
2. to define it as a masterpiece or checkpoint.
3. compare them

If you can not , then we see not a work of art , and the visual image of the concept .

Zara , I have only one request - often go to write. Soul rests , when you read >

[zarajara]

Сообщение от artcol

Zara, I have only one request - often go to write.
Soul rests, when you read >

 
I will try!
 
> > >

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от redbor

It's a very big number!
How much can it buy more paintings!

How many times to rest in a good pub?
How many bottles of good vodka to buy?
Yes, much more that good could that money buy, eh.

[redbor]

Many of which can enumerate, but let's take a standard unit of measurement - picture. >
$ 11 million - can buy a dozen different patterns , for example, Vasilyev Khrutsky, Aivazovsky, Shishkin , Serov ... and someone else ?
( So little the gallery >
The picture Rothko " Royal Blue " is worse than " orange yellow .." on a collection of paintings of the classics ? >

[манна]

Сообщение от redbor

A lot of what you can list, but let's take a standard unit of measurement-picture. >
$ 11 million - can buy a dozen different patterns, for example, Vasilyev Khrutsky, Aivazovsky, Shishkin, Serov ... and someone else?
(So ​​little the gallery >
The picture Rothko "Royal Blue" is worse than "orange yellow .." on a collection of paintings of the classics? >

In the terminology of Igor Guryev The above text is nothing more than a silly rassuzhdalovo.

1.C TZ global research Islands, these classics are not classics and second-rate artists. This is for us (in the absence of the other) they are our "everything."
 
2.Est one more time. This auction (the excitement and what if the second chance will not). And at times for his "want" people are overpaid, if easily afford it. Realizing this (and not zamorachivayas that someone, such as a forum artinvestment, they may find lohami cat. "Vparivayut")
You simply mesmerizing amount ..... and for people buying pictures for hundreds of millions of 10-20 mils. it is not the money .... or little money.

 Psychology (single person) is similar, regardless of the mat. opportunities.

I also sometimes (knowing that) overpay. Solely because of their "want" and because I can not afford it. Just sum others. And I absolutely do not care what the saved (say 50 thousand rubles), I can something somewhere (FIG I do not need such a tiny pocherkushek the gallery with Artnau) buy. And if you suddenly become an unnecessary fit ... so I'll find another 50 thousand rubles., I'm not the last fifty dollars overpaid ...

[artcol]

Сообщение от Manna

Psychology ...

What is the point. And then start to talk about some laws that underlie the pricing of e - algebra can measure up .

But we do not have auctions for living artists. Not for us and not for us it is. Mafia " handshake people on" toxic sizzles in each branch , where it comes up ...

[redbor]

Сообщение от manna ; 2347801"

I was not interested , which is saved (say 50 thousand rubles ) I can somewhere something

That's it , your " overpaid " 50.t.r - nothing good would not buy a $ 12 million , perhaps something can be ? Well, not like you Shishkin Maakovsky and TP - choose - what pictures and how you can buy for that amount >

Сообщение от manna ; 2347801"

for people to buy pictures for hundreds of millions of 10-20 mils. it is not the money .... or little money .

You think so?
 And you do not know who bought the Rothko for 87 million and who has bought for 75 million ?
And for what they buy: for his collection of love Rothko painting ,
or to amass for resale ?
 Well, if you do not know. about whom and what about?

Сообщение от artcol; 2347821"

What is the point. And then start to talk about some laws that underlie the pricing of e - algebra can measure up .

Here wrote above about the manipulation that is programmed and the selling price . Probably because it is. >