Can I bring cockroaches? Forum one year later

[Seriy]

Stanislavsky, just for the sake of truth, woodpeckers live in the woods, and cockroaches are killed by freezing temperatures and, respectively, in the forest can not live without.

[Дмитрий]

Сообщение от Stanislavski

...
should not respond to every cockroach bites.

And they also bite?
It's very interesting!
Maybe you - an entomologist?
The exact species name snappish cockroaches do not tell me?

[Posav]

Сообщение от Stanislavsky, 1349771

Exactly. And the heated debate within the Code is completely shown, and even necessary.

You sort of appears once a year on the forum? Maybe that's why you do not know that there is a group of old men, or grandfathers, by analogy with CA allows himself to write another, and vulgarity, and nastiness and podnachivat. I wonder how they will comply with the code and the constitution?

[Станиславский]

Сообщение от Posav

Do you like appears once a year on the forum? Maybe that's why you do not know that there is a group of old men, or grandfathers, by analogy with CA allows himself to write another, and vulgarity, and nastiness and podnachivat. I wonder how they will comply with the code and the constitution?

The fact that I do not appear, does not mean that I do not read. As for the "attacks", I just also propose jointly develop uniform rules for the "grandparents" and to "greenhorns." Without exception. Moreover, it should be the result of collective forumovskogo mind.

[Самвел]

I think that would look ridiculous precisely what will be more dear friends, the. And then ends with a theme (bad), others grow, like mushrooms, and really fun to read, to me personally. I just do not command a person can not adapt to the team, it certainly harms my life, and all those things I do, but oddly enough gives me a lot of strength and good spirits. With regard to Stanislavsky, then yes, it's an old dear forumchanin, but I also do not like the tone of the message.

[Станиславский]

Сообщение от Samvel

I think it's funny to look exactly what will be more dear friends, the. And then ends with a theme (bad), others grow, like mushrooms, and really fun to read, to me personally. I just do not command a person can not adapt to the team, it certainly harms my life, and all those things I do, but oddly enough gives me a lot of strength and good spirits. With regard to Stanislavsky, then yes, it's an old dear forumchanin, but I also do not like the tone of the message.

I'm sorry if someone hurt. Believe me, it was not in my plans. Cockroach metaphor I have chosen only in order to more sharply define the problem, as the disease, which is ill Forum, dangerous and able to mimicry, so a surgical incision seemed to me necessary.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Stanislavsky

surgical incision seemed to me necessary.

And it now seems that without some "surgery" to become a forum ...
do not even want to use this comparison.

Here, I have already quoted this comparison: in the station tavern.

[Posav]

Сообщение от Stanislavski

What I do not appear, does not mean that I do not read. As for the "attacks", I just also propose jointly develop uniform rules for the "grandparents" and to "greenhorns." Without exception. Moreover, it should be the result of collective forumovskogo mind.

And then what about disputes in which the truth is born ? Here, for example, show kitsch, and begin to crack up. Write, that is kitsch and you're bad, crossed the road businesmenu, stepped on self-esteem, an enemy who must be blamed, and that its ban.

[SAH]

Сообщение от Samvel

is not like the tone of the message.

Since cockroaches may bend, but essentially agree that the theme of protection against vandalism - protection is very relevant.
Stanislavsky just about protecting said I think about protections.
Cockroaches is a way of thinking in the subject no more.

[Станиславский]

Сообщение от Posav

And then what about disputes in which the truth is born ? Here, for example, show kitsch, and begin to crack up. Write, that is kitsch and you're bad, crossed the road businesmenu, stepped on self-esteem, degraded the authority of the enemy who must be blamed, and that its ban.

I think that is not enough to put stamp of "kitsch" at this or that work. It is also necessary to argue with authority its verdict. And also to listen to counterarguments. All the more unacceptable, as it seems to me to talk about the motives of those who defend the right of this, as you seem kitschy to exist. Here error is fraught with personal insult an opponent.