|
|||||||
| Art Kaleidoscope Interesting and relevant information about art. Discuss general art issues and any topics not covered in other forums. It’s only about art — love, politics, sports, hobbies etc. are discussed in “Chatter”. |
| View Poll Results: Кто, по Вашему мнению, настоящий автор картины «Вид Кремля»? | |||
| И. С. Глазунов |
   
|
24 | 68.57% |
| другой художник |
  
|
4 | 11.43% |
| скорее Глазунов, чем другой художник |
  
|
5 | 14.29% |
| скорее другой художник, чем Глазунов |
  
|
2 | 5.71% |
| Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-06-2008, 20:24
|
Original language: Russian #1 |
|
Гуру
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Москва
Posts: 2,576
Thanks: 1,512
Thanked 2,998 Times in 1,037 Posts
Reputation: 1816
 |
Refusal of a living artist from his work
In connection with recent events at Sotheby's, namely, the scandal of Glazunov (http://artinvestment.ru/news/auctnew..._glazunov.html), I began to wonder: What is often still living artists which are already popular, so do? how it is dangerous for his own wallet? and what to do if you got in this situation? It seems to be working with perfect provenance, as the artist himself from it refuses. For example, I heard that Nemukhin so sometimes comes. As you noticed the main question: what to do in this situation and whether it is worth to buy such "controversial" things?
|
|
|
| Tags |
| art consulting, art dealer, failure |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
Threaded Mode
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +3. The time now is 16:58.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.