|
|||||||
| Art Kaleidoscope Interesting and relevant information about art. Discuss general art issues and any topics not covered in other forums. It’s only about art — love, politics, sports, hobbies etc. are discussed in “Chatter”. |
| Результаты опроса: Кто, по Вашему мнению, настоящий автор картины «Вид Кремля»? | |||
| И. С. Глазунов |
   
|
24 | 68.57% |
| другой художник |
  
|
4 | 11.43% |
| скорее Глазунов, чем другой художник |
  
|
5 | 14.29% |
| скорее другой художник, чем Глазунов |
  
|
2 | 5.71% |
| Голосовавшие: 35. Вы ещё не голосовали в этом опросе | |||
|
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
02.06.2008, 20:24
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #1 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 11.04.2008
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 2,576
Спасибо: 1,512
Поблагодарили 2,996 раз(а) в 1,037 сообщениях
Репутация: 1814
 |
Refusal of a living artist from his work
In connection with recent events at Sotheby's, namely, the scandal of Glazunov (http://artinvestment.ru/news/auctnew..._glazunov.html), I began to wonder: What is often still living artists which are already popular, so do? how it is dangerous for his own wallet? and what to do if you got in this situation? It seems to be working with perfect provenance, as the artist himself from it refuses. For example, I heard that Nemukhin so sometimes comes. As you noticed the main question: what to do in this situation and whether it is worth to buy such "controversial" things?
|
|
|
| Метки |
| art consulting, art dealer, failure |
Древовидный вид
|
|
|
|
Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 01:08.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.