Help with the assessment Aivazovsky

[мистер-у]

Kama, work is very slabenkaya.Ya doubt that this Ivan Konstantinovich, or bad fotografiya.Esli offer 160-200 thousand, then you are lucky or you set a price for which the work is not prodastsya.Rabotu not restore in any case.

[Сергеич]

There is an information base on Aivazovsky site, where size, year, price .. can determine the price, what problems?

Naturally I looked. There analagichnogo size is cool night, the Marine landscape for 200 000 $ and type shown Kama for 50 000 $. It turns out in the second figure, right?

[мистер-у]

Sergeyitch, you correctly opredelili.Gde something around 50 EUR, but is very weak level of painting for such a large hudozhnika.Nebo does not it, the water is not discussed, because photos in low resolution. Gos. NIIR. in attribution Aivazovsky generally solves nothing.

[Kama]

Dear Mr.-y and Sergeyitch! You play solitaire? I love raspasy and a miser. All this is very, very similar to the second course - the sleepless nights in good company. We assume that the low resolution, etc. .. Thanks for the advice - work to restore and I was not going as well as sell for 50 thousand. For the money this cow and the most needed - particularly in the financial crisis

[uriart]

Such a "cow" I would not be needed.
From her much good (milk), no!
The work is very weak and little resemblance to Ayvazovskogo.U had a postcard-like, type 6h9sm, and are clearly visible hand of the master.
Why not be said about this.
Because of Aivazovsky's writing and his life. And may well be that the work of H /X, at the time.
Show her Petrov VA - That's for sure say it or not he.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от uriart

show her Petrov VA - That's for sure say it or not he.

Why do you think so?
-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------

[uriart]

Because Petrov just and is an expert stylist for artists of this period.
In any case, such has always been.
No longer work in the Tretyakov his rating several podupal, but, nevertheless, for it still has a following. And he always objective in their assessments. Even more than!
And more!
He first pointed to his own mistakes and errors in attribution
Russian works related to the case Preobrazhensky.
Not everyone is bold enough to admit their own mistakes!
Especially when it comes to quite a lot of money.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от uriart

He first pointed to his own mistakes

Is why I began to respect SergeiSK.

[Glasha]

Сообщение от uriart

work is very weak and little resemblance to Aivazovsky.
Because of Aivazovsky's writing and his life. And may well be that the work of H /X, at the time.

Sorry, as I recall, Aivazovsky was still among other things a good manager, he had many pupils and assistants, who began painting as an amendment to it, finished and put the signature, and how such a huge performance. Figures do not exactly remember, I am not a big fan of his, who can mend.

[uriart]

There is this view that he was written about 6000 works.
However. Judging by how much work appears on the market, we can say that There is more work than the author wrote.