Orthodox realism (or the ability to write, draw)

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Maroussia

In my opinion, mediocrity is not able to create anything new, outstanding, much less a new direction in artificial

A Hurst? Created as a new direction "plagiatokommercheskogenialny artbiznes"

[Артём]

Сообщение от Maroussia

Unfortunately, the exceptions only confirm the general rule.

Maroussia, for me not confirm! I am personally all differ. For me it's just for you, apparently, is difficult.

Добавлено через 5 минут

Сообщение от KaterinaMN

If you recall the conversation, we talked about that, unfortunately, people realize the necessity of drawing, it is now much smaller, and vice versa - many people go on about the deceptive ease with contemporary art. that's about it.

All clear. For me - it is bad.

[Артём]

Сообщение от KaterinaMN

If you recall the conversation, we talked about that, unfortunately, people realize the necessity of drawing, it is now much smaller and opposite - too many go on about the deceptive ease with contemporary art. that's about it.

All clear. For me - it is bad.

[Pavel]

There is no realism. It is idle imagination. There is a realistic method that covers all the arts of all time. Courbet was a realist, which is in opposition to a bourgeois nymphs began to draw the workers and ordinary people that is truth of life. Zytem were the Impressionists and Van Gog.Obuchenie art of painting includes the ability to draw and there is no better way to learn how to copy the samples, along with work from life on the principle of simple to complex. That does not mean that later life should be to repeat these lessons, but instead pushing them to find their own way, original style and direction. Continue forward talent, and if it does not go run the compilation and so you know tricks.
Big mistake to consider that if you make abstraction immediately becomes an original, but in this way is even harder to be original and an example of what Hurst and three other four names. Others simply suite emphasizing "greatness" of these "peaks".

Added after 8 minutes

Сообщение от KaterinaMN

Artem, then after a few of the other conversation going. Originally it was a question that contemporary art, unfortunately, almost forgotten technique of drawing and painting, in favor of "expression" of authors. Moreover - contemporary art in the West (and may be our already) his understanding - and painting - are often diametrically opposite positions.

You just do not know very well that "Western art". It is not self-expression are ordinary weak, and in search of its original path. This is well written by Matisse.

[Маруся]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

A Hurst? Created as a new trend "plagiatokommercheskogenialny artbiznes"

I am NOT a fan of Hirst, so I do not know, he himself described as his creative activity, or is your definition?
But if this abstruse phrase means roughly: "plagiarism on a commercial basis - the most profitable business in the field of art" - that is, unfortunately, the direction of our mortal life. And the art is hardly relevant.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Maroussia

And the art is hardly relevant.

That we are so you think (in contrast to the main unit artinvestorov)

[Pavel]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

That we are so you think (as distinct from the main unit artinvestorov)

Customers investors risk losing their investment.

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Pavel

Customers investors risk losing their investment.

very often it is money laundering. A man in his right mind understands that a shark in formaldehyde, sooner or later be worse.

[Peter]

Сообщение от Pavel

Customers investors risk losing their investment.

When everyone sees that "the king then-naked!"