The picture was not going to give the owner

[Евгений]

Сообщение от FAIv

First, if the picture in the Temporary Importation and framed correctly, then at least Andrei Rublev, though Shishkin, though Vangog, does not matter you can take on it and temporary.
In this case - I agree with Vyacheslav - is very smells zakazuhoy,

All right.

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от Veronic

, it would be cheaper to write an expert from Russia to Belgium and to pay him all the expenses, moving and bonuses. Generally, if grazhdaninin Belgium Russian, then knowing the laws were at least silly to meddle with such a picture in Russia and the naive hope that it will easily take out her back.

Expert "to write" very difficult. Everyone says: "Vezite now in Russia." Oh how I lured one eskperta that just did not bode well - not go, even crack. Although in principle not refuse ...
Maybe catch forward, it is difficult to say. And me personally, something you do not want to carry a picture on the examination in Moscow or St. Petersburg. Where is the guarantee that my picture suddenly turns smuggling, as in this unfortunate Belgian or be declared "public property"?
Then to prove that you're not a camel ...

[frol50]

Сообщение от Eriksson

experts "write" is extremely difficult. Everyone says: "Vezite now in Russia." Oh how I lured one eskperta that just did not bode well - not go, even crack. Although in principle not refuse ...
Maybe catch forward, it is difficult to say. And me personally, something you do not want to carry a picture on the examination in Moscow or St. Petersburg. Where is the guarantee that my picture suddenly turns smuggling, as in this unfortunate Belgian or be declared "public property"?
Then to prove that you're not a camel ...

And you give him a ticket, travel, hotel, voznagrazhdenie.Obeschali pay? If you promised, how strangely expert, why did not want to go?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от frol50

And you give him a ticket, travel, hotel, voznagrazhdenie.Obe schali pay?

Funny question ...

[ФАИв]

frol50, A Haha he should go - then?

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от FAIv

frol50, A Haha he should go - then?

Oh, I love existential questions !!!

[Маруся]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

He imported n.h for examination and brought to n.h.
Her're not signed in process ... That is, nobody here is not fault of word.
All the prosecution was trying to sell. But attribution is, as a pretext for sale.
Violation of the rules of movement of cultural property not even mentioned.

It is difficult to judge about the detective story to media reports, which often differ "inaccurate".

Slava, you're right, imported work n /x, and take out, according to the examination, had Bryullov museum value.

The Law on the import or export is an interesting article, whereby Rosokhrankultura right to make citizen, exporting cultural value proposal for its redemption, which is "hard to refuse ... But this usually refers to citizens of Russia. Refused a Belgian collector from Russia's citizenship or is a citizen of Russia with dual citizenship? Also the role ...

In this case, everything is difficult, because the circumstances of the case, in fact, nobody knows. (Example of import-export activities at the exhibition will not work - another mechanism).

Added after 17 minutes

Сообщение от Eriksson

experts "write" is extremely difficult. Everyone says: "Vezite now in Russia." Oh how I lured one eskperta that just did not bode well - not go, even crack. Although in principle not refuse ...

Eriksson, looking for another expert.
A. Sarabyanov, for example, travels abroad and the invitation does not stop. And can you imagine what it means to evaluate "a collection of Russian avant-garde", and even tell the owner that up to 80%of work - wrong ...

[Евгений]

The story ..
-------------------------------------------
April 28 The State Russian Museum showed reporters a previously unknown painting by Karl Bryullova "Christ in the tomb, which the FSB gave the museum at the time the criminal case of smuggling, Interfax reported.
Head of Department of Art XVIII - early XIX century the Russian Museum Gregory Goldovsky told that the picture was written Bryullov in 1840 for the chapel graphs Adlerberg. This work was atypical for the artist's technique - paint with the properties of transparency in a very thin cloth. The painting was supposed to be installed in the window of the church, as stained glass.

After the revolution, the picture was taken in Europe in 1930 Adlerberg bequeathed canvas Orthodox parish in Brussels. Those already in the 2000's decided to sell the "Christ in the tomb." The acquirer was a native of Russia, a citizen of Russia and Germany collector Alexander Pevzner. He wrote to the Russian Museum of the desire to return Bryullova in Russia, sold a painting to the museum.
The representative of the FSB in St. Petersburg, Valery Kuznetsov said that Pevzner imported picture in Russia from Belgium in March 2003, stating in the customs declaration knowingly false information about her. In St. Petersburg collector temporarily placed in storage Bryullova work of the Russian Museum, and to legalize its agreement with the parents of his wife, who have drawn up the documents required for the acquisition of Russian museum for 400 thousand dollars. "
In April, it was a criminal case on smuggling of cultural property. In August 2003, Pevsner decided to draw as a defendant, but two days later a preliminary investigation was suspended because the collector resides in Germany and Russia did not come.

In May 2009, counsel for Anna Stavitskaya, talking about the situation with the picture Bryullova on "Echo of Moscow, said that criminal proceedings were instituted, not because the person has committed a crime, and to deprive this person of this picture."

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[artcol]