28 th of Russia Antique Salon

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Konstantin

At the beginning of the phrase that flashed at this salon are no masterpieces. And that's not so - there is, and even what.

Constantine this nonsense why waste time? "The people on the forum comes to a different .. think that is actually" masterpieces "..

[Konstantin]

Mona Lisa saw for the first time at the Salon, was unable to pass.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

I saw a good Krymov Sudeikina, Bogoliubov, Falk, Benoit ... Separately, I want to say about Falco. It is rare in the market early still life

Thanks, but where on what stands? Photos have?

[Lorart]

revered posted Tyutchev above link to the publication in the Independent newspaper.
http://www.ng.ru/culture/2010-02-18/8_salon.html
as well as fully contained very publication. for those who link will not be able to pass.

and why now is a place here? what's the point? people clearly first wrote about the Salon. There are people (like Markina, which are also cited, or Boutkevitch and TAs. - which are perfectly write about antiques, antique market, including on the race for many years). Well, or new talented reporters. But why do so first press release published. Then link that blunt generalities repeats the worst place of the official release. If you really give references - that for something worthwhile, interesting ...
In my opinion, sorry.

[Евгений]

Lorart, Photo good, but you're right information on antiques, Russian paintings, old masters, porcelain virtually none.

[Tana]

Сообщение от Lorart

venerated posted Tyutchev above link to the publication in the Independent newspaper.
http://www.ng.ru/culture/2010-02-18/8_salon.html
as well as fully contained very publication. for those who link will not be able to pass.

and why now is a place here? what's the point? people clearly first wrote about the Salon. There are people (like Markina, which are also cited, or Boutkevitch and TAs. - which are perfectly write about antiques, antique market, including on the race for many years). Well, or new talented reporters. But why do so first press release published. Then link that blunt generalities repeats the worst place of the official release. If you really give references - that for something worthwhile, interesting ...
In my opinion, sorry.

Сообщение от Eugene

Lorart, Photo good, but you're right information on antiques, Russian art, Soviet art (the period of 1930-1950 years)., Old masters, porcelain practically no.

Lorart, Eugene Well, so add your links if you have more complete information, any message is always possible to add, I'll just thankful

[Wladzislaw]

Konstantin,

that, and for the work requested from 5 thousand $? ...

http://forum.artinvestment.ru/attach...1&d=1267312513

[манна]

Wladzislaw, for this request to 10 thousand dollars.

[Wladzislaw]

Сообщение от manna

Wladzislaw, for this request to 10 thousand dollars.

Stunned! ...

Under the order will make dumping

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Lorart

venerated posted Tyutchev above link to the publication in the Independent newspaper.
http://www.ng.ru/culture/2010-02-18/8_salon.html
as well as fully contained very publication. for those who link will not be able to pass.

and why now is a place here? what's the point? people clearly first wrote about the Salon. There are people (like Markina, which are also cited, or Boutkevitch and TAs. - which are perfectly write about antiques, antique market, including on the race for many years). Well, or new talented reporters. But why do so first press release published. Then link that blunt generalities repeats the worst place of the official release. If you really give references - that for something worthwhile, interesting ...
In my opinion, sorry.

Lorart, you no reason to apologize. This is your point of view, and good that you have one. I myself have repeatedly drawn the attention of the forum on the fact that Russia has a shortage of journalists who write about the art market and art with knowledge of the case. Why do I hang out at the forum article, the content of which I do not agree or that I was not quite satisfied? But precisely because of the fact that then discuss what someone (in this case, you) did not like the article or add missing information. The fact that the articles published in the media, reads a lot of people. This, in turn, form a definite opinion in the society. And, in my opinion, it is important to discuss at the forum, which is not so in these publications.

Often, news reports, notes, and more extensive publication injected into the information revolution false or distorted information. Forum is just an opportunity to debate is identified. The strength of the forum, unlike traditional media, is precisely that it is possible to lively discussions of the material, and it would be wrong not to use.

In your assessment notes, published in "Nezavisimaya Gazeta", I agree. On my own I might add, that the man who wrote it, not something that has never wrote about the cabin, but probably did not expect to go into this topic. This is one of the anadromous articles "on the occasion." I want to come to the salon person who had read this story, it's a great question! Those who go to beauty permanently, of course, will come. But interested in whether the new interior potential client? I do not know. Poor Russia's professional art critics, or, shall we say, her immaturity, and lack of information on the art market are a significant factor hindering a more efficient functioning of Russia's art market.

Agree, I did not publish this note and you do not react to it, this is very important, in my opinion, the problem would remain untouched. Incidentally, this theme - one of the most talked about parties salon. (Theme efficiency of information support of the passenger compartment.)

P.S. Yes, you still have a question, why publish the entire text of the article in fasting and not simply be a link to the publication. I can answer for himself. I give the entire text for the convenience of the reader. I know from personal experience, that was published in fasting text read are more likely than the link. And another important nuance - published on the forum is more convenient text quoted in the comments.