Rate it now Konchalovsky

[Eriksson]

A bit much, perhaps, letters ... Strokes, rather ...
By the way, that sign that the middle ( "crossed") I have somewhere seen as an example of falsified. Unfortunately, I can not remember exactly where - too much information reviewed recently

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от ANTIK

Copy from Konchalovsky and what a nerd signing. Personal opinion.

It is quite likely. But it seems that the signature was a long time. Or?

How do fakes were distributed under Konchalovsky in 50-60 years? When they do appear on the market?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Eriksson

A bit much, perhaps, letters ... Strokes, rather ...

Letter fine, but uncertain as something they are shown as if the author has forgotten what the letter for what followed, but now with the letter "to" everything is OK, remember, let alone a year-no problem!

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Letter normally, but uncertain as something they are shown as if the author has forgotten what the letter for what followed, but now with the letter "to" everything is OK, remember, let alone a year-no problem!

"Grandpa old, he still" (c) ...

[redbor]

And the painting itself, still very similar to the original.
At least in the photo cards from 1985.

[artcol]

Сообщение от redbor

And the painting itself, still very similar to the original.
At least in the photo with the cards in 1985.

Yes, sopadayut 99%

[Seriy]

artcol, at 99? and the color of the leaves does not count? If printing shifted color, and blue reflections in the vase disappeared, and so they have a mark on the spot.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Seriy

artcol, at 99? and the color of the leaves does not count? If printing shifted color, and blue reflections in the vase disappeared, and so they have a mark on the spot.

A look at the contours and details, but by color and tone is difficult - it Well Printing 1979. 1%I left just on this case.
Ie if it is a copy - it is absolutely accurate (which in principle is not uncommon for museum work).

[redbor]

Сообщение от artcol

looking at the contours and details, but by color and tone is difficult - it w printing

The more colors and distorted in the photo and skanirovanii.Esli 2 works to put together and make one photo then you can talk about the color scheme
 

Сообщение от artcol

if copy - it is absolutely fine (which in principle is not uncommon for museum work).

exactly, an exact match for all the details, but if we consider that work is not a museum,
then perhaps this is the original?

[artcol]

Сообщение от redbor

If 2 works to put a number ...

Сообщение от redbor

is an exact match, all the details, but if we consider that the work is not a museum,
then perhaps this is the original?
It is interesting to look at the turnover. And the signature, of course.

The stamp signature is not true - that is strange in general.

[Seriy]

redbor, colors are distorted at the same time the whole image, if blue goes from the leaves, then he leaves and a vase.