On the correctness of the list of "12 most expensive Russian artists"

[Вивьен]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

But he is Armenian.

\r\nwith Turkish roots ...

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от DimaB

On the correctness of the list of "12 most expensive Russian artists"

Actually, I began: for the convenience of collectors in the top-12 Russian artists actually recorded 17 names. That is, in fact, the article provides a top-17. So even if you delete all of unreliable characters, then 12 Russian still be typed. Well, how are you this option?

[SAH]

Сообщение от ranzher

add Florence, Uffizi - one picture.

\nIn Venice, it seems Kustodiev seen self-portrait is one .

[ранжер]

Probably still in Florence and only in reproduction.\r\nIn the gallery of self-portraits from the sidewalk is not allowed.

[SAH]

Сообщение от ranzher

I guess, still in Florence and only in reproduction.\nIn the gallery of self-portraits from the sidewalk is not allowed.

\n\nranzher, like the original, чесное word, I have seen, yet wondered how he got here I think. In Venice, it was exactly remember. AAA can then show came from Florence to Venice, so it may be so, the details do not remember.

[Wladzislaw]

Сообщение от DimaB

Chaim Soutine /.../certainly in Russian do not talk, held in Russia Empire, only the first 20 years of life, as well as an artist was formed in Paris, where he spent the remaining 40 years.

/.../

Or Mark Rothko, who left Lithuania, which has never particularly Russianness did not differ in the age of 10 (according to other sources, 7) years.

Sutin, of course, in Russian speaking, it is with the French he had a bad .

Rothko left Vitebsk province, now part of Latvia.

Before the show of such global problems, it is desirable to refresh their knowledge of a few.

[мистер-у]

Note from Ranzher I can tell from France. In the Louvre, until recently, a permanent exhibition - 5. Now, it seems, already 4, was removed Aivazovsky, plus 17 icons.

In the Louvre, even a landscape Stepan Kolesnikov, which in Europe called the Russian Paganini.Pravda not know hanging it in the main exhibition or not.
I think that any museum in the world with pleasure gained monumental work Briullov, Ivanova, Repin same Aivazovsky, Kuindzhi.Tolko they can dream about it.
But we have in the Hermitage of all their brilliant artists.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Mr-y

Message from Ranzher I can tell from France. In the Louvre, until recently, a permanent exhibition - 5. Now, it seems, already 4, was removed Aivazovsky, plus 17 icons.

In the Louvre, even a landscape Stepan Kolesnikov, which in Europe called the Russian Paganini.Pravda not know hanging it in the main exhibition or not.
I think that any museum in the world with pleasure gained monumental work Briullov, Ivanova, Repin same Aivazovsky, Kuindzhi.Tolko they can dream about it.
And here we are in the Hermitage all their brilliant artists.

Judging by the albums that, in libraries, such as: "100 outstanding artists", there is generally about Russian art is judged only by Kandinsky .. (as Bud simply seam Russian realism does not exist) ...

[LCR]

Сообщение от Mr-y

I think that any museum in the world with pleasure gained monumental work Briullov, Ivanova, Repin same Aivazovsky, Kuindzhi.Tolko they can dream about it.
And here we are in the Hermitage all their brilliant artists.

Museum, who appeared to wish to buy or Repin, Ivan Aivazovsky, he immediately would have done it - it's just nothing compared to the value "of their geniuses" (in extreme cases, could declare a national subscription, as was done in the UK for the possibility of buy Titian for 50 million pounds - would be thrown off, and bought myself some Shishkina there or Kramskogo).

The implication: no desire to lay oneself out to Briullov and Kuindzhi they do not have, preferring to acquire additional works of the same genius artists - Rembrandt, Rubens, Hals. And who blame them for this?

[Lorart]

Funny. Then the administrator, in my opinion, wrote that this theme repeatedly at the beginning of a forum discussed. And now for one day has caused so much feedback. And, note, not only among the "newcomers". Hence, all the same clarity in the formulation of criteria for it. Yes, and discussion of clarity especially not add.
Maybe not only paid the conference to organize, but also to something like a round table. While a virtual?