|
Art Kaleidoscope Interesting and relevant information about art. Discuss general art issues and any topics not covered in other forums. It’s only about art — love, politics, sports, hobbies etc. are discussed in “Chatter”. |
![]() |
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #21 |
Пользователь
Регистрация: 22.04.2008
Сообщений: 50
Спасибо: 2
Поблагодарили 48 раз(а) в 22 сообщениях
Репутация: 24
|
![]()
But who I do not like is Gerhard Richter! read various articles about him, but still did not understand what kind of money paid. I think his art is so uninteresting, that no intelligent concept is not justified.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #26 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 10.04.2009
Адрес: ישראל
Сообщений: 2,566
Спасибо: 6,355
Поблагодарили 2,524 раз(а) в 963 сообщениях
Репутация: 4255
|
![]()
Really like this theme!
My favorite artists: 1. Cezanne - on top of the pyramid! 2. Picasso - Graphics and Drawing 3. Modigliani - portraits 4. Soutine - everything! 5. Aron Buch - the last of those who felt the color! 6. Peter Dick - Pastel And a lot of good and different, gifted, not enumerate all |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #27 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 02.02.2009
Сообщений: 4,600
Спасибо: 9,551
Поблагодарили 3,679 раз(а) в 1,689 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 4
Репутация: 6488
|
![]()
They, of course, huge ... I was impressed by Goya ... "double" Maha "- one of the most striking paintings in the world, then his portraits. By the force of expression, he is second to none later or contemporary artists. And such lightness and perfection of the painting itself!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #29 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 29.01.2009
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 1,422
Спасибо: 2,395
Поблагодарили 2,244 раз(а) в 552 сообщениях
Репутация: 4259
|
![]()
Chtoy something Surikova nobody likes!
Then it would be good to note - this is love from reproductions or personal contact with the painting. I am thrilled to reproductions of the artist Gustave Caillebotte, and with the personal touch disappointed. In a live impression - sobbing in front of Velazquez (barely dragged), and then a strange way before Levitan - "Autumn Day at Sokolniki" (very surprised). Now the exhibition "Flowers - the remnants of the midst of this horrendous mess of exposition again admired levitanovskim Still life with a white bouquet. Apparently, all the time. In the Louvre - Poussin, Watteau, Chardin. Inexpressibly beautiful series of tapestries think "Lady with the Unicorn" (Musée Cluny), but the same series in New York is not impressed (was still young). In Venice - Carpaccio (series with George and the dragon, who bristled at first, and then wilted, poor). Cezanne. Falk. Glasha, I'm glad that you like Korovin, he certainly was a mark of genius, I've worked with him and not get tired to admire. Forging a it is impossible. The more bitter to see his Parisian things. A Surikov, gentlemen, do not forget. He's not in vain Velazquez studied! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #30 |
Banned
|
![]()
From Russian the most stunning:
Surikov Viktor Vasnetsov Bogolyubov Kustodiyev Somov Serebryakov Grigoriev Gorbatov Korovin Vrubel Levitan Serov Malyavin Bakst Nilus You can write to infinity ...... I would like to add. Who likes the work of Luba, that can not not like the work of Bakst, Benois, Serebryakova, Serov, Vrubel. This is because everything is connected! It's like music! Only the music of colors and light! Short. I got lost in their emotions. Sorry. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Метки |
investing in paintings |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Тема | Автор | Разделы | Ответов | Последние сообщения |
The most significant artists of the twentieth century | Meister | Artists, artworks, art history | 56 | 25.05.2012 07:58 |
|