Forgery paintings Burliuk at Four Corners

[OlegTsi]

ranzher, I now feel like an examination of art criticism. To be more accurately - it is only a fragment of the original work (this has size 107h90 cm). I mentioned this on sewn canvas (the seam is visible from one side of the 1 /3 to 2 /3 on the other hand, in width. I also mentioned about poverty in 20 years, which experienced author and his family. Being in a stressful condition and able to some furious Burlyuk cut this work together with other huge canvases.

What motivates Burliuk at pictures of large format? He was new in the country, it was necessary to create something great.

Regarding prices - up to you - work "In the Church" (see my thumbnail above) last year in London was sold about 650 thousand dollars. Japanese fisherman -542 thousand dollars. Radiostil - almost half a million. Painting and crafts - the same period, no less important, the museum's plan - the cost - 6-digit numbers.

On your question if I knew where the work - yes, of course. In a private collection, but to disclose where and who will not.

PS. There you have a special interest is to this work. There is a reason? If you also know her whereabouts - then we have mutual friends.

[ранжер]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

Do you have a particular interest in this work it is.

Not only that. Even to one.


Can you say something about it?

[OlegTsi]

ranzher, very low quality photos, details are not visible yet. I wanted to be closer look at the fellows. They can not see the signature, although the judge at first glance - as if everything is in order.

[Alexkorvin]

OlegTsi, since I went to "such a spree," I can not try to take advantage of courtesy the author's post. : rolleyes:
I want to put on our next auction so now now DD Burliuk.
It was purchased at a European auction. Frame is clearly not his own. A stretcher with a stamp (see photo). Size 61h46, see 1927

I almost forgot the question: Your opinion on authenticity?

[ранжер]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

I would be closer look at the fellows.

"Little people" - the master of himself and his entire family. Group portrait in landscape.


Many, many years ago had a chance to look at these two pictures, as they say, alive. "Workers", is more accurately translated "laborers," ie, unskilled workers (labourers), then made a tremendous impression. This is - of course, a masterpiece, one of the best works produced by D. Burliuk for his life. Place this picture, no doubt, one of the major museums in the world next to the other geniuses of expressionism.

The young gallery owner told me that the previous owner of the picture, refined aesthetic person, the holder of the best in Europe, collection of Russian avant-garde, supplying the major museums of the continent works of Jewish writers of the movement, specially went to Burlyuk to buy him something from this period. The artist could not offer, and gallery owner, resolutely refused to buy war crafts. Both were disappointed. Suddenly Burlyuk remembered that in the garage lies a canvas early 20-ies. Brought in, unfurled. According to the curator, it was a six meter panels, except for a small fragment, c completely destroyed colorful layer. However, this fragment of his fascinated. They slaughtered the surviving part of the picture, it was immediately purchased, and an additional bonus, the artist, the marshal, on the joys and later acquired a family portrait.

I asked the price. If memory does not change the "laborers" were worth while about 250,000 pounds, and "Family Portrait" about 60000. It seemed to me that this is much higher than market prices, especially as it was shortly after the world's rush for art, in other words, the crisis. No rush to Russian art market did not exist. Those who would later be called the new Russian, have just started the post-Soviet space to the award of national wealth. Was the primary stage of accumulation of capital. Feverishly bought up houses, cars, concubines. On art, no one thought.

By purchasing from Alistair much less significant now another author from the former collection of his kin-aesthetic (not to mention help myself, that this purchase, having made a long and difficult road, was resold in 2008 in London, 100 (!) Times more expensive), I, as he put it, became his friend (old fellow). Subsequently we have not met many times to mutual satisfaction.

After a while I called Alistair and said that he was ready to negotiate on the price of "Hardworking". To my surprise the picture was already sold. A year or two young gallery owner, and got rid of the "family portrait".

Whoever the current owner of "Hardworking", as the French say, take off my hat, because he has an outstanding work of art.

Over masterpieces could and should be paying more. Only in this way and going to a collection of first-class works of brilliant names. Is not it nice qwerty?

[SAH]

Сообщение от ranzher

For the masterpieces could and should be paying more. Only in this way and going to a collection of first-class works of brilliant names.

Well said, pointedly.

[OlegTsi]

ranzher, well, you see, you all know. Fine. Good. It was from these collected fragments and other cut works in London held a retrospective exhibition of works Burliuk this period. To be more accurately work was bought for 79 thousand in London in 2003. It is a masterpiece, as well as work Radiostil and Bridge. At the expense of fellows I'm not mistaken. This style of writing often Burliuk.

I am now showered photographs by mail, asking to lichku. I see that there is a problem in the identification of works in Russia. Get real, I'm not an expert ...

Well, passed the exam?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

I am now showered photographs by mail, asking to lichku. I see that there is a problem in the identification work in Russia.

For example, I answered all at once-in Burliuk do not understand, but somehow dootezdovskim period studied, and even a couple of times went to Ufa acquainted with there the sobraniem.Tam they have a lot Burliuk. 50 works (37 in hudmuzee and another 13-in natsmuzee RB).
They show to the 100 th anniversary of doing more, "Texture and color. The works of David Burliuk in museum collections in Russia's province" -77 pieces from 14 museums in Russia released two-volume catalog. And those 13 works from the collection natsmuzeya first shown to the public in general.
(This is the 20-ies. Divided the collection: part of the Ufa Proletarian Museum, now BGHM them. MV Nesterova, and part-13 works, the Museum of the East, now the National Museum of Belarus.)

[OlegTsi]

Alexkorvin, no doubt, 100%original work.

[uriart]

Cyril Syzransky, can you tell me, and if possible, get catalogs works Burliuk?
Can help me?