Crimean artists and Crimean-school

[vyadem]

rolls, that's about Khan's information (it is in Ukrainian, but understandable).
The only thing in my handbook it Nicholas.

[Артём]

Сообщение от gans

all at one time, someone invented. And what, you think wrong, today, the Crimean artists called the Crimean school?

To be honest - No! Crimea is rich with wonderful artists who have a lot of directions and creative ideas. Bogaevsky, Barsamov, Aivazovsky, Samokish etc. What do they overlap or we must distinguish between the Crimean Crimean school or not? As an artist I feel that the school is called the Crimea, but it is somehow very narrowly, for example Zakharov, Bortnikov, Stolyarenko, I make it for development, that artists are not constrained by such well-known masters, and will come with development and other ARC and other school. Is not it? And then the Crimean school would blur the concept, and therefore it is not.

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Artem

I feel like an artist is called the Crimean school, but it is somehow very narrowly, for example Zakharov, Bortnikov, Stolyarenko, I make it for development, that artists are not constrained by such well-known artists and development will come and another Crimea and other schools. Is not it? And then the Crimean school would blur the concept, and therefore it is not.

The concept of "School" - it is always narrowly ... And no need to lock himself - need to evolve. But the unique color which brings Zakharov and others - for me and there Crimean school. Today, unfortunately, bright followers no (or almost no). Maybe it will disappear from the latest artists ... Such is life. You have another opinion - it is your right. Not everyone is an artist who lives in the Crimea is the representative of the Crimean schools (and the Crimean artists - of course). Was Zakarpatskaya School - original, distinctive ... But after two generations, it has practically disappeared no ... Each has its own destiny.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 10 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от vyadem

that's about Khan's information (it is in Ukrainian, but understandable).
The only thing in my handbook it Nicholas.

Khan Nikolai (1924-1981), Honored Artist of USSR (1974)

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

That's Fair! All the names and how much each exhibited!
41 by!

Indeed exhibition is very representative, as by the standards of today's dnya.Vot only, please - "Exhibition of creativity artists - marine painters?.
With regard to the concepts of "Crimean", "Odessa", "Barbizon" - their head and share art historians, critics and other brethren, which artists are obliged to fame, and she an artist - bread.
Certainly, some "big" artists are students. However, all ends in one generation. Since every self-respecting creator of the "digest" the knowledge, evolving, trying to tell its own word in art.
Imitators - not in the bill.

[Allena]

Here's another, just in case, with the Four Corners:

Khan Nikolai (1924 - 1981)
Ukrainian painter, landscape painter. In 1945 he graduated from HU in the Alma-Ata, where he studied under the famous Ukrainian artist Alexander Cherkassky. Prior to 1952 he was a student HIC (workshop A. Shovkunenko). Honored Artist of the USSR in 1974. Works are in the Memorial complex "The National Museum of the Great Patriotic War 1941 - 1945 gg.", National Museum of History of Ukraine, NHMU etc.

[rossor]

Сообщение от Buscador

But that unique flavor that brings Zakharov and others - for me and there Crimean school. Today, unfortunately, bright followers no (or almost no). Maybe it will disappear from the latest artists ...

Its predecessor was the Crimean schools Cimmerian School zhivopisi.Vot that writes about her Wikipedia:
"Cimmerian school of painting - Regional School painters of landscape painting, developed in the late XIX - early XX century ...
Основоположниками Киммерийской школы живописи стали Иван Айвазовский, Константин Богаевский и Максимилиан Кириенко-Волошин. All three artists have written mostly "memory". Numerous romantic "storm" by Ivan Aivazovsky, the fantastic city of Constantine Bogaevsky, Voloshinskii watercolor Cimmeria created play of the imagination, a flight of fancy, were the result of improvisation, no less than the vigilance of realistic vision and an excellent artistic memory. A second feature that unites these creative individuals can be called passionate, knows no measure bias to the legendary land of Cimmeria by what they saw in the land of real-eastern Crimea, its sea, for sea Aivazovsky - it's still predominantly black sea, sea Cimmeria, although He wrote almost all the seas and oceans, to the quirky romance Cimmerian cliffs, sloping hills, uninhabited valleys and coasts. These landscapes are almost never depicted people, only the elements of primeval nature, and here and there a stone house or castle, or a ship - a work of man, too weak before the power of the universe. "
Until 1994, it was thought that the last "carrier" Spirit Cimmeria was Maximilian Voloshin, whose death cut short this mystical school.
However, according to some well-known experts, the school was revived in the 90 years of the last century. This means that there is a real contemporary artists, as if the Spirit guides and successors Cimmerian painting school level I. Aivazovsky, and K. Bogayevsky

[Buscador]

Сообщение от rossor

The predecessor of the Crimean school was Cimmerian school of painting.

So it. There might also be other, or the mixture of different, but under one condition - should be bright, talented, highly pioneer ... We look forward to them!

[Артём]

Сообщение от Buscador

Today, unfortunately, bright followers no (or almost no)

That's right. From imitation of past masters have hurt in his eyes. Followers little.

Сообщение от Buscador

highly pioneer ... We look forward to them!

Well this is loud, of course, you say. What say about these artists?

[Altim]

Сообщение от Artem

What to say about these artists?

Cypresses beautiful.

[Артём]

Сообщение от Altim

Cypress beautiful.

I like this work. Always look at her in the album. It is a pity that only in the album.