On the strange influence on the art

[uriart]

Сообщение от Allena

But is it really dating? Burliuk because from time to time, dated the later paintings in earlier years.

Here I am about to say.
Burliuk repeatedly in later works set the date 10-ies.
I think that otgadka here.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Allena

But is it really dating? Burliuk because from time to time, dated the later paintings in earlier years.

That yes, it is possible ...

[mezon]

Сообщение от K-Maler

The revolution is not necessary, but ... as you wish, go out from the circle, if you're in the modern art all to such an extent clearly.

After your quotations:
"Art is a philosophical statement here in a way that whenever a certain understanding of the world"
"... in the world is not about playing any single determinate being, but about playing the universal essence of things."

all became clear to me about art. Thank you.

[mezon]

Сообщение от Buscador

Eco, where you skidded!

  I'm amazed myself: confused: - I skidded to an understanding of what art was, for example, Salvador Dali (now found a quote):
Dali still define it as a wave, then a stream of particles - will write surrealist number 1 "on his own person, although one French essayist had already guessed that Dali and a particle and a wave simultaneously '

That's why some are so far from understanding of Dali and the very essence of modern art I do not understand. Where do they bear? Probably chemistry closer to them than physics.

[mezon]

We remembered physics, chemistry ... Let's go back to childhood and remember the cartoons. In one of these beasts measures the length of boa. Its length, as was, was ten crocodiles or thirty-eight papugaev. Happy parrot cries out: in parrots that long! Now what do you think what we measure art? What is the true art in terms of parrot and crocodile? To understand what I am you, let us remember more and mathematics ... the more so that the measurements we have already begun to do. In school, the lesson often begins with a theorem, and then asked her to prove themselves or to follow a mathematics teacher. Where do I want you to start and what my theorem? Where are we with Dali ...? One can argue on this "myth of progress" and cause a lot of quotations, but it seemed easier to start with a theorem and then the path of the proof is substantially simplified. Knowing the goal easier to go to her not wandering through the dark zakaulkam ignorance. So theorem: "I am what I see and vice versa: what I see - there I am." Dali incorporated the fact that he saw himself reflected this understanding of art in their kartinah.Dumayu every artist would understand what it means for him and the arts. That there intuitively or consciously are all artists. It is easy, but at the same time it is very difficult if you go to this by some chose a man tasted the apple of knowledge. So, you can prove this theorem by themselves, but can try to do it with me leisurely climbing up on this path. I myself have not gone that way, but I was told how to move those who are wiser. "There is only a myth way." What throne? Questions who have a tour guide? : confused:

[fross]

Modern science wallows in a lie

Portal research and development - R & D. CNews already wrote that lie "in the form of silence, retouching images, and other totally unacceptable forms has grown in modern science to the scary and obessmyslivayuschih science as such magnitude. However, modern science continues to choke on a lie.

Читать дальше... 

In an open online journal PLoS ONE May 29, 2009 published the results of the synthesis study Fanelli, Daniel (Daniel Fanelli) from the University of Edinburgh (UK), entitled How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data.

The study compiled data on the extent of conscious and blatant manipulation of data, it is unacceptable in science, in principle, but has become an integral feature.

Such studies were conducted in the past. For example, in 2002 the staff of the journal Cell Biology (Journal of Cell Biology) by using a special test found that one in four accepted for publication by the material contained at least one illustration, held a special, unacceptable in science processing - manipulation of the contrast to hide data merging of several images into one, and much more.

Sometimes all. Sometimes there were also leading figures.

However, such studies previously conducted on selected subject areas and using different methodologies. Bring them together to present a complete picture lies in science, could not.

An attempt at such analysis has taken Daniel Fanelli. The results were bleak. Say lies - for everyone.

About 2%of scientists frankly admit falsifying their own data ( "doctored, retouching, combining images, such as using graphical editors, etc.). 34%recognize that hide the data and facts, not sufficiently relevant to their interests.

Assessment of quality of labor's own fellow scientists significantly darker - the figures are 14%and 72%respectively.

The truth, as usual, probably lies in the middle, but the very existence lies in modern science as a phenomenon of massive, sustained and comprehensive, forcing at least overstated its role in modern society. This - in the following publications on the portal R & D - R & D. CNews.

In the cartoon was not a crocodile, but he was a baby elephant.

[mezon]

Сообщение от fross

In the cartoon was not a crocodile, but he was a baby elephant.

  Well, it's not a lie In the main, I did not deceive you - these were different animals. With regard to science, I believe, that lies in it a lot. However, despite this she is moving forward just because moves in the search, but not worth contemplating. So I propose a walk in the mountains, the hills ... the waves ... You will see with your own eyes and no one deceive you is not going to. However, affected your perspective suggests that in science a lot of subjective and it is so for the reason that science - this is how human language and art.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

mezon, I did not understand, and science got to do with it? Art and Science?
Craft
I put the foot of the art:
I became a craftsman: fingers
Highlight obedient, dry fluency
And loyalty to his ear. Sounds slaying,
Music I razyal like a corpse. Believed
I algebra harmony. Then
Already dare, versed in science,
Indulge bliss creative dreams. (c)

[mezon]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

mezon, I did not understand, and science got to do with it? Art and Science?
Craft
I put the foot of the art:
I became a craftsman: fingers
Highlight obedient, dry fluency
And loyalty to his ear. Sounds slaying,
Music I razyal like a corpse. Believed
I algebra harmony. Then
Already dare, versed in science,
Indulge bliss creative dreams. (c)

Well, of course! You have answered this question:
Believed
I algebra harmony. Then
Already dare, versed in science,
Indulge bliss creative dreams.

  "Then have ...", but without it you will not sing freely overcoming doubt in my heart ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от mezon

Well, of course! You have answered this question

Well, suppose I have not answered, "and cited the words of Pushkin's Salieri's" little tragedy ". Words, incidentally, a negative hero. : D