Let's discuss the price of Savrasov

[nikola]

Сообщение от heir

I disagree.
Confirm their rubles.

They can show their rubles? Not so if they are drawn by the artist?

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Maybe this Savrasov of those? From the "weak", which you have seen?

It was a question of this paper Savrasov you felt fake. These amateur work, with the induced signature or as it may be more. Again, the work which we discussed earlier, the real, and these two - false. Mo - I think it's simple. Give me a link to that discussion (which discussed this Savrasov) if you is not difficult.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

you are considered false.

Specify.

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

For me, the thing questionable.

A reference and does not need sinuyu-click on the arrow in the quote-a subject, from which this quotation is taken, and will. Somehow ...

[color="# 666686"]Added after 13 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

This is not Savrasov. Very weak picture.

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Savrasov this happens, it happens and worse. Usually, they say "drunk".

This is about not "drunk"? : D: D: D

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

It was a question of this paper Savrasov you felt fake. These amateur work, with the induced signature or as it may be more. Again, the work which we discussed earlier, the real, and these two - false. Mo - I think everything is simple.

I do not understand, Kirill, that for you not understand? Mo - I think I've answered quite clearly.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

I do not understand, Cyril, that you understand? Mo - I think I've answered quite clearly.

I explained that that now Savrasov called "questionable" and not "false."
There is a difference?

Сообщение от Tjutchev

It was a question of this paper Savrasov, you felt fake.

Now, after reading the topic that acknowledge this?

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I explained that that now Savrasov called "questionable" and not "false."
There is a difference?

Now, after reading the topic that acknowledge this?

     Yes, you then have used the word "dubious". By the way, if you have changed your opinion about the work on Savrasov, or you - still in doubt?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

This is about not "drunk"? : D: D: D

  Kirill, I repeat, these two pictures - not work Savrasov AK.

[nikola]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Maybe this Savrasov of those? From the "weak", which you saw?

It is not weak. This is a sorry cow on ice, in a spacesuit and skating.
There are no signs of not only education, but no signs of propensity for drawing.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Yes, you then have used the word "dubious".

That's all.

Сообщение от Tjutchev

By the way, if you have changed your opinion about the work on Savrasov, or you - still in doubt?

Now I is not interested in any way. Road spoon for dinner. I have to attribute that, there is something to have an opinion. : D

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Kirill, I repeat, these two pictures - not work Savrasov AK.

I envy your flatness. "Falshak", "fake", "fakes" ... : cool:

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]
Incidentally, the topic was asked to discuss the prices of these pictures. : eek:

Сообщение от John Preston

What, in your opinion, the real price of these paintings in the current market conditions?

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Now I is not interested in any way. Road spoon for dinner. I have to attribute that, there is something to have an opinion. : D

I understand that our subject of discussion, that is a picture Savrasov and his works, nor which have not disappeared. Why you lost interest in him? And then, it was really interesting ...

[uriart]

Cyril Syzransky, well, not lukavte!
You can see that these works to Savrasov are irrelevant.
I can not understand what all the fuss?