A.Deyneka? Children Ball. Your opinion.

[тата]

Сообщение от Igor Sasha

In 1966 Dejneka , shall we say, did not shine is not particularly .
And the level of painting is not much of it is separated - that period.
But the fact that he never imposed as strokes , he always smear certain , apart from one another , roughly speaking .
He elicited smear form , and here she is hiding .

 Painting this conscious level simulation is far from level Deineki 60s as well as amateur and professional level . Do Deineki like there was no professional blunders and errors. And the kids did not go amble sorry. <! - ~ 1 ~ -> And the "asphalt " track across the field did not draw if
Of course it does not attempt to portray the shadow , it is unclear on what and in what direction is discarded.
And so it smears detail , though of course you're right , it is not so technically all here.

[художник Федотов]

Сообщение от antikvar555 ; 2996351"

Compare the two work - in my amateurish opinion there is something common .

Yes "general" certainly there ... two children and another on the picture ... But one boy 2 , as in " Call of the novel" , while the other boy and girl ( like " Alenka " and brother " Ivan " ) ... I no longer , alas, nothing "general" could not be found ...

De jure , the signature in the second picture Deyneko, de facto : Deyneko - neDayneko ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от antikvar555 ; 2965021"

Exhibiting at this forum this picture, I did not want to not offend anyone , let alone insult . I just wanted to hear the opinion of respected members of the forum .

You heard it and .
But, apparently , you want to hear lectures on topics
 a) formal and stylistic method in art ;
b) examination of easel painting in the second half of the twentieth century ;
c) creativity AA Deineki 60s .