The sixties?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от camertus

Why are people drawn to Tischler - honestly do not understand.

And unless this is not you written?

Сообщение от camertus

signed in pencil n /a as A. Tyshler.

[camertus]

from the beginning I did not believe in the signature.
but see the professionalism of execution Studies.
and I understand that it is 1960 - 1970.
The time in which I am not strong.
Therefore inquirers.

[U_Z]

Сообщение от camertus; 2773001 "

who it could be . But it seems there is no such specialists , solid cultural studies . Sorry . And the fact that super thing - it's a fact . What the student ? ? ?

Identify the author , if it is not a sketch -known work - is impossible. In the 60 's and 70's since been contacted by many, including the future does not become well-known artists .

Chances are you still weak nasmotrennost . You would know how many of these studies without the signature of <! - ~ 6 ~ -> .

PS: There are signs that I date her 1970s <! - ~ 7 ~ -> .

[annagavr]

This work is now 3 years old wandering around the market.

[camertus]

in my opinion even more.
She has also been signed by N /A, do not you remember?
or not yet signed?

Сообщение от annagavr

This work has been about 3 years wandering in the market.

Added after 8 minutes
Žilina not be??

[annagavr]

Сообщение от camertus

​​in my even more. She has also been signed by N /A , do not you remember? or not yet signed ?

In my opinion, has been authored by someone with . Probably Tischler .

Сообщение от camertus

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 8 minutes[/color]
Žilina not be ???

Not Žilina , of course.

And there in the left corner of the signature is not smeared ?

[тата]

A. Of course not Tyshler with a side does not belong to the sixties . This is an artist , though, and extremely independent in his work , but basically grew up from the midst of the OST . Who is even slightly "in the subject " knows this and surprised to hear the testimony of some participants. And of course, his work has always been known , to a greater or lesser extent. And some of it got in the Tretyakov Gallery with exhibitions of the 30s.
But most importantly , in my opinion it is obvious that the subjects , and the way he has not changed , although changed a bit because of the time. All his life he exploited the same motives. But with age, painting became rougher and less harmonious in color.
Then in the sixties to send a hundred artists who were not widely known and were far from officialdom . All the St. Petersburg school , and the whole range of artists , except Samohvalova . All of them worked in a table, and Rusakov, and Greenberg , and Vedernikov .
In my opinion, matured in the sixties atmosphere of the sixties , and excuse me, they flourished was just then. And best of all Tischler created it in the 20- 30s , actually like Labasa, Vyalova etc.
I understand, now is the time that no exhibition , the creative approach , his views on Russian and Soviet art .
Sorry Cyril, but with all due respect to you ( one phrase about " a fantastical world of illusions " is worth <! - ~ 7 ~ -> ), your position is invalid.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от tata

Sorry Cyril, but with all due respect to you (one phrase about "a fantastical world of illusions" is worth <! - ~ 7 ~ ->), your position is invalid.

And what?
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[тата]

You explained why Tyshler to 60.
So it's strange to consider them.

[I-V]

acetate, the case is still in the fact that for themselves Tyshler sixties was a very important figure.
It is much more intimate than the "Leningrad", "the Circle", etc.


So, although it is not the sixties, but consider it out of context shestideyasyatnichestva, in my opinion, it is impossible.