Drevin??

[I-V]

Сообщение от U_Z; 2770941 "

bullshit . IMHO

I have this " Drevin Jawlensky ," confess , too, was not impressed . This landscape , by the way , you could still be taken for udaltsovsky (IMHO ), but Drevin seems here is not to blame.

However, there is little subtlety : on the label , if I'm not mistaken , there is a reference to the catalog of the exhibition in Moscow Drevins to its 90th anniversary in 1979 with a foreword by E. Rakitin . What does this mean?

http://www.lot-tissimo.com/de/i/6933322/p/45/- here turnover seen better

Drevin , Alexander Davidovich . Exhibition of works ( 1979, Moscow) .
    Alexander D. Drevin , 1889-1938 [text] : the 90th anniversary of the birth : the catalog of the exhibition /[ foreword . EB Rakitin ] Drevin , Alexander Davidovich . Exhibition of works ( 1979, Moscow) . - Moscow: Sov. artist, 1979. - [14] . 9 liters. silt. : Ill . , 29 cm - 2500 copies. - 0.60 p .
In nadzag . : Union of Artists of the USSR , Moscow . org . Artists' Union of the RSFSR

[U_Z]

Сообщение от camertus

but the year 1918 seems to me all the same.

It is reasonable to argue, work without "1918" is worth some money, and signed "1918" is a completely different <! - ~ 1 ~ ->.
Do you agree?

[camertus]

I agree.
simply issue price was 100 American dollars.
I would not even old ink on paper to soil.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от camertus; 2771141 "

simply issue price was 100 American dollars . I would not even old ink on paper to soil .

And if these sketches a whole room filled up ? And somewhere , and their 1000 Russian rubles to pay at least? There can be no fat :
Get ink and weep !
Writeof[COLOR="Gray " ]Drevins[/COLOR][COLOR=Navy"]violently ,[/COLOR]
While the roaring slush
In the spring of a black light . ( c) < ! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[camertus]

Well, then I would really like to put the signatures in.

[U_Z]

Сообщение от IV; 2771061 "

However, there is little subtlety : on the label , if I'm not mistaken , there is a reference to the catalog of the exhibition in Moscow Drevins to its 90th anniversary in 1979 with a foreword by E. Rakitin . What does that mean ?

It turns out birochek and other marks of the exhibition in the USSR did not survive. Valid.
German gallery has this information (See E. Rakitina, A. Drewin-Moscow in 1979 . ) , But his tally puts the " issue " (Alexander Drewin Wenden /Lettland 1889-1938 ?). I have a question , they doubt that he died in 1938, or have any other doubts <! - ~ 1 ~ -> .

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 1 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от camertus; 2771241 "

Well, then I would really like to put the signatures in .

For this we need to have a talent <! - ~ 7 ~ -> . Crime <! - ~ 7 ~ -> . And it is necessary , if <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[camertus]

Then that date azachem put??
and two times?

[U_Z]

Сообщение от U_Z

It is reasonable to argue, work without "1918" is worth some money, with the caption "1918" is very different.

What for?
So I expressed my assumption.
 

Сообщение от camertus

Then that azachem date set??
and two times?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от U_Z

A.
Drewin-Moscow 1979

In 1979, the exact date of the shooting did not know - have assumed that after his arrest and was killed, but exactly when - did not know.

[U_Z]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky ; 2771351 "

In 1979, the exact date of the shooting did not know - have assumed that immediately after his arrest and was killed, but exactly when - did not know.

The publisher of "Art" in 1976 already knew . " Um . " all <! - ~ 3 ~ ->

By the way, in the following information about the artist is a link to the storage of works of the 1910s .