N. Kravchenko

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от natacha_m60

I looked through a magnifying glass and saw in 1918

So if you make a little more effort and money ... namely: find out why lubricated date and the lower part of the letters of the surname, is it the painting is homogeneous with respect to time including podpis.Dlya that we should see in the ultraviolet (try currency detector). Ascription - dark pyatna.Podpis of writing coincides with NI Kravchenko. . Check availability cracelures-cobweb of cracks pictorial layer, appear to show vremenem.I course to art in thin. Museum, and the let he says, and you poslushayte.Podramnik certainly not native, not professionally stretched canvas - must win. Are making a portrait of a dignified frame (here is not spare money) suitable for the beginning of last century, and .... Let those who want to prove that this is not NI Kravchenko.

[redbor]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

.... Let those who want to prove that this is not NI Kravchenko.

And who wants that? And why did he have to prove that it is not Kravchenko?
A good frame, of course, is needed, it is always the place

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

let him who wants to prove that this is not NI Kravchenko.

If you want to sell, then it is they will have to "prove" authorship.

[natacha_m60]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

If you want to sell, then it is they will have to "prove" authorship.

These sales are not yet, but thanks for the comment.

[наследник]

Сообщение от Mongolia 270395

but there are pictures that more 100let with this white canvas?.

There. On the dark canvases are caught "fuckers". And cracelures too.

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

If you want to sell, then it is they will have to "prove" authorship.

I represent - is itself a sort of "expert" putting his finger in the zeal ... nose and gundosit.I canvas wrong and craquelure fingernail scratches, zakorlyuchka-why are not there and do what is in his hands when the watch snizu.Da and provenance - a sacred cause, without it, nothing at all worth it. "And at the very crumpled twenty in sweaty little hands and wants to azh legs suchit.

[redbor]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

I represent - is itself a sort of "expert" ... And at the very crumpled twenty in sweaty little hand

The American, or what?
"Twenty" - the dollar after all, bill? And why should he do it?

[Монгол]

Сообщение от heir

There. On the dark canvases are caught "fuckers".

What does this have to be conditions-vacuum packaging in a supermarket)? Well, if honest, say bought a first-hand, no suckers do not catch is not the price, and the white canvas, and prove that it is more than 100? Sorry that is not on the topic: shy:

[SergeiSK]

Сообщение от Mongolia 271275

a white canvas, and prove that it is more than 100?

If the canvas doubled, then it may well be light at the back if the restorer took for a new canvas. There are pictures with duplicate canvases, and that more than 100 years.
In this painting - a painting stretcher date does not match, it is newer. Yes, and canvas like duplicate, hard to see on the photo, but it might be.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Mongolia 270395

matures legitimate question to the professionals: and there are pictures that more 100let with this white canvas?.

After asking a question, you showed a piece of the picture discussed and looked at him a part of the edge of the canvas and a little bit without paint.
But most likely it is visible light soil. Apparently, the artist has used a primed canvas, the factory primer. In this case, the soil could not darken over time.
You're not talking about the color of the back side asking, according to the fragment shown you?