MZ Help to attribute the painting!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Artem, 2493691

By the way in the next topic like hut

Since that first scene in this topic appear.

[Артём]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

So that landscape first show up in this thread.

Hm.
I have not seen.
You may be confused?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Artem, 2493721

Can you be confused?

No.
This topic has been shown that landscape with the assumption of the author:

Сообщение от Thutmose, 2491931

Krome kak Bashinjagyan Gevorg nikto na um ne prixodit

You captured the true connection.
>

[Артём]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

you have correctly grasped the connection.

No.
I have not.
especially since I do not think it Bashinjagyan.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Artem, 2493761

the more that I do not think it Bashinjagyan.

But the link is given.
>

[Артём]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

There is no communication?

 
> <! - ~ 7 ~ -> ......
"In view not seen."

No, not like the Crimea.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Artem, 2493791

No, not like the Crimea.

Yeah, I think - this is the Caucasus.

[U_Z]

Сообщение от soveticus; 2488401"

Dear friends! I got a picture in which I can not understand: Canvas , oil , 21 x 30 cm Bottom right: " MZ -94 ."
The back of the board - from the pre-revolutionary Russian label baguette shop. The level of work , the artist is likely to be known. Help me, dear experts ! Thanks in advance.

Dear , Soveticus.

recommend to do chemistry and doubts about the time of writing the work will disappear by themselves .

Some thoughts out loud:

paperboard - old ( it is clear) and well pozhivshy ;
- sticker pasted on one another ( and have long been trimmed zalosnilis ?) there is no trace of existence cut /torn pieces of chips? (although there is one place ) , a long sticker was below the text, but is cut off , it seems ;
- Turnover well lived , and a painting in the ideal ? Was the restoration ? (chemical analysis will show it ) or ... and probably put fresh paint ;
- The signature mark (monogram /​​year) , in my opinion , belong to a man's hand mid /late 20th century (chemical analysis, and it will show .)

[Rus-Art]

http://www.korners.kiev.ua/russian/painters/731

the signature and biography works, but not for painting ...

[soveticus]

Сообщение от U_Z

Dear , Soveticus.

recommend to do chemistry and doubts about the time of writing the work will disappear by themselves .

Some thoughts out loud:

paperboard - old ( it is clear) and well pozhivshy ;
- sticker pasted on one another ( and have long been trimmed zalosnilis ?) there is no trace of existence cut /torn pieces of chips? (although there is one place ) , a long sticker was below the text, but is cut off , it seems ;
- Turnover well lived , and a painting in the ideal ? Was the restoration ? (chemical analysis will show it ) or ... and probably put fresh paint ;
- The signature mark (monogram /​​year) , in my opinion , belong to a man's hand mid /late 20th century (chemical analysis, and it will show ).

Well, of course , was the restoration . There, on the picture can be seen - on the edges of cardboard were crumbling . Even washed and blew Lacko . >

Added after 20 minutes
Thank you all!
Took the examination.
Wanted to first understand which of the experts to give?
But apparently, it is necessary to pay for a consultation!
>

Will report on the results!