Introduction to painting: we start?

[fross]

Сообщение от IrinaC

Stranger, the age of five, I used to take her child to the artist
She worked with her drawing and painting to tell the story, and everyone is professional, well yaykom and correct understanding.
How would you yourself do not engage with the child, it will be noticeably self-education, the patches will be.
Prettification strange drawings, for example, already limits the imagination of the child (up to five years, they have such a wonderful, unspoiled view of the world).

Absolutely correct. If you are lucky with the teacher and the interest will probably develop into something more serious.
When you go to the Pushkin Museum next door to the building the children's school - there are exhibited in the lobby of the students. When I first saw long eyed with suspicion signature 5 years, 6 years old. In these studies, another advantage - the competition. The child sees what others can and he tries. And they, by the way, there is a special drive to sketch in the museum halls. A wonderful sight - kids with tablets in Matisse's work.

[Ninni]

Сообщение от fross

Absolutely correct. If you are lucky with the teacher and the interest will probably develop into something more serious.
When you go to the Pushkin Museum next door to the building the children's school - there are exhibited in the lobby of the students. When I first saw long eyed with suspicion signature 5 years, 6 years old. In these studies, another advantage - the competition. The child sees what others can and he tries. And they, by the way, there is a special drive to sketch in the museum halls. A wonderful sight - kids with tablets in the work of Matisse .

Excuse me, but not forced to agree.

At such an early age the child to draw better on their own and do not have a so-called authorities and EXAMPLES eyes. Drawing their own, the child is fully manifests itself without succumbing to the influence of creativity of other children and teachers. The competition does not stand up poorly formed children's character and crucial for the child and someone else may be harmful, it is possible - an erroneous opinion and praise for another child.
  Babe quickly responds and begins to like to imitate someone praised and most likely - lose yourself ...
Let me give two examples from personal observation:
1 - In the classroom became friends 2 girls 7 years - both very, very talented, each drawing its own, a wonderful children's style and was no doubt of their creative future.
  Some time passed and the apparent strength of character - a girl (a strong and strong-willed by nature) flourished in his paintings and the second (completely fallen under the influence of the first) degraded irreversibly.
2 - To me as a friend brought a girl 8 years with a request to see her paintings and advise the teacher.
  I was struck by pictures of this child! It was something amazing! Pictures looked at me already formed an extraordinary artist!!
   I strongly encourage parents not allocate the girl to the teacher, led all reasonable arguments but apparently in vain ... The parents were far from the arts and saw just a reluctance to help.
   The girl was all taken to the same sort of studio and accidentally saw her "paintings" in a couple of years I was hurt for the lost miracle ...

So it is apparently not rare. Forgive me for such a long text.

[Glasha]

A bad teacher - overwrite authorities individuality.

Good - remove it from examples of authorities.

As for competition, only you can determine whether it will benefit your child or hurt.

Definitely, in my opinion, only that razukrashki harm and disclosure of identity, and development of imagination,
because we have been squeezing into someone else's frame (not to be confused with copy).

Better napokazyvat it, for example, the same sunflower seeds)) (see the topic "Whose seed" - an excellent selection), and draw a "Sunflower".
(not yet decide or not decide to a teacher).

[fross]

Сообщение от Ninni

Excuse me, but not forced to agree.

At such an early age the child to draw better on their own and do not have a so-called authorities and EXAMPLES eyes. Drawing their own, the child is fully manifests itself without succumbing to the influence of creativity of other children and teachers. The competition does not stand up poorly formed children's character and crucial for the child and someone else may be harmful, it is possible - an erroneous opinion and praise for another baby ....

Looking at some of today's celebrities is understandable delight of the children's creativity. But agree that the desire to improve and search for required in any professional development. Without the will and desire does not work, as it was not gifted child from birth. And of course the gentleman who sent the case in the right direction and gave the right teachers. I think all of this together is called destiny

[Glasha]

Сообщение от fross

But you must agree that the desire to improve and search for required in any professional development. Without the will and desire will not work

This is all certainly true, but globally and collectively, and, most importantly, - then;
In the meantime we have () 3-year-old boy, where it is important to support the interest incurred and correctly, delicately develop,
no further whetting the desire (and this, too, could easily happen), etc. .. until he has such qualities as the will and desire.
Observations Ninni are based on the experience that is valuable.

[IrinaC]

Сообщение от fross

Absolutely correct. If you are lucky with the teacher and the interest will probably develop into something more serious.
When you go to the Pushkin Museum next door to the building the children's school - there are exhibited in the lobby of the students. When I first saw long eyed with suspicion signature 5 years, 6 years old. In these studies, another advantage - the competition. The child sees what others can and he tries. And they, by the way, there is a special drive to sketch in the museum halls. A wonderful sight - kids with tablets in the work of Matisse .

We did something serious is not counted, only for general education.
Pictures copied too, but in accordance with the theme of the lesson. If the lesson was on Greek sculpture, a sketch Greek sculpture, etc.
Homework assignments were, for example, to find the most beautiful tree on the street and sketch it.
I wanted to say that it is better when a child is engaged in a professional, because he has so much knowledge and technique that a simple parent-lover so wisely did not teach the material.

[IrinaC]

Сообщение от Stranger

but the idea of "books-razukrashki and great artists" - good. Publishers have in the forum? How do you think? Here you and investments, and art)

Stranger, today in a bookstore, I saw many such books. View company Prestel; whom they have just not, and Klimt and Monet and Kandinsky, etc., etc. "razukrashki"
http://www.amazon.com/Gustav-Klimt-C...ref=pd_sim_b_2



at Amazon found a series of "Come look with me", you can also nice
  http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b?... 0 & y = 0

[Stranger]

Сообщение от IrinaC

Stranger, today in a bookstore, I saw many such books. View company Prestel; whom they have just not, and Klimt and Monet and Kandinsky, etc., etc. "razukrashki"
http://www.amazon.com/Gustav-Klimt-C...ref=pd_sim_b_2

Well done! - On the fly, grab)
Thank you, Irina

"Razukrashki" - something controversial, but there is in them something ...
Do not pretend to be kids at that age.
Perhaps, this is the only opportunity for them to do something nice for its ruchenkami. We Suteeva is the tale of the cockerel, who forgot to decorate, and therefore he was "unreal", "lifeless". So they are taken with enthusiasm for each new attempt to revive it.