A copy of Plato's "Naymichki", help assess

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от redbor; 2147091"

already seen this priest's copy of the Orenburg and museum, and sold at auction.
Tell me, please. The view and the one that the subject is presented .
Better than that at the auction ?

Joke would you like? Well you tell me at the mercy of whether it is possible for a very bad amateur photography judge the quality of painting ? (Well , except for stating that a certain quality is the place to be ?)
And while I peck finally limit the following remark : naymichka worst of all, I have viewed on the given links - " Naymichka " Brush " A.Kozhevnikova professional artist ." It is better not to look at, so do not worry about the welfare of the baby (as if she had robed him chent not ). And the rest - a copy of a copy. Skokastoit - still can not tell you because they do not know about. ( Such is the paradox: Platonov with Popov - understand, but the price ...)

[garry1950]

In my view, copy, represented by Mrs. Wilhelmina is the most successful of them all, including a copy of Luchian Popova!
From SW.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от dabbler ; 2146671"

Chariton Platonov wrote " Naymichku ," and immediately put it on an annual academic fair. In the exhibition the painting was acquired in the property of the Imperial Academy of Arts (in timing came from there ), and APTAMATITSKI added to the list of originals , designed for student copying.
And repeat it , accordingly, could any studiozus . And Lukyan Popov - including . But something I doubt that the official copy of the original surviving author of the Academy , a conscientious copyist did not put before the signature of the few magic words or " Cb because Platonov ," or " Cb because of such and such . Cop . John Doe ."

Well, if there it was , and then cleaned up , and left only "L. Popov "?

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от Guriev , Igor ; 2148471"

Well, if there it was , and then cleaned up , and left only "L. Popov "?

But why? Do not see the logic . Now, if by removing the " k Cb " left " Platonov ", and then transported to the last letter of the name " and " on " b " - then it is understandable . ( Such dishonest manipulation, by the way, are very common ).
 And then ... Why remove half of the real author's inscription ? Give this a picture of an original work L.V.Popova possible only by destroying a lot of prints. And in parallel conducting lobotomy EVERYONE WITHOUT EXCEPTION FOR RUSSIAN PAINTING SERVICE XIX CENTURY . (Which , incidentally , is not excluded , given the tireless work of removal of the brain by Mrs. Magnolia ...)
Well, this is purely my personal opinion. They asked - responded. Somehow , in general.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от dabbler

But why?
Do not see the logic.

Logic, perhaps, was not, and there was some situation.


But the thing with "Kristy," I repeat, in my opinion, perfectly done.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от dabbler ; 2148501"

and parallel conducting lobotomy WITHOUT LIMITATION ALL SERVICE ON RUSSIAN PAINTING OF THE XIX CENTURY .

Well, here is a participant from St. Petersburg (! ), Which is the third year tells everyone that " Naymichku " Popov wrote , apparently in the Russian was not even once. <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

Сообщение от Mieste p- y; 2146411"

Lucian wrote the original Popov, Chariton Platonov has no relation to this work

Сообщение от Mister - y; 688903"

This work was written Lucian Popov, I saw the original in two sizes , 100 * 45 * 65cm and 37cm .

You have to gently remind of Syzran each time the present author of the famous things.
3 years. <! - ~ 1 ~ - > You really must have something to remember , or , or ... I do not even know ... <! - ~ 12 ~ ->

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от Kirill Syzran ; 2148521 '

It is necessary each time from Syzran gently remind this author of the famous things. Ay ! Is there anyone home?
3 years. By now , probably once or remember , or ... I do not even know ...

Am -in- a- em ...
I, for instance , could not remember the meaning of the word "paradigm" . And all the time, asked her husband to remind human it is. Her husband , explaining in stopisyaty times the value of the term, outlined a kind of arms in the air, an isosceles triangle. I zavorazhenno buyout and scrutinized . But as the words of my head immediately flew , then " paradigm " in my mind forever entrenched as is an isosceles triangle. Maybe the " Naymichkoy " - the same way?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от "dabbler; 2148551 '

I, for instance, could not remember the meaning of the word" paradigm ".

As I understand you.

I now do not understand the meaning of "trend" and "meme".


I explained a hundred times.

As a part of, and beyond.

And right away.

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

I have explained a hundred times.

As a part of, and beyond.

And right away.

Uh-huh.
And I have.
And fly straight through the hole done by triangle "paradigm". stuck only concepts that do not coincide with the paradigm of configuration ...

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от dabbler ; 2149651 '

Yeah . And I have . And fly straight through the hole done triangular " paradigm ." Stuck only concepts that do not coincide with the paradigm of configuration ...

paradeigma - Gr. - For example, a sample - a historical example , to compare anything to prove or compare ...
But your case is really nothing to compare ...