Private collections at the Pushkin

[John Preston]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Also in the exhibition presented a huge section of European painting 17 - 19th century.
need to spread?
Is anyone interested?

It is very interesting, Constantine, but you do not want to unnecessarily load, so I leave this question up to you ...
<! - 6 ~ ~ ->

[Кирилл Сызранский]

On
still life [/URL] funny grapes.

Balls for cocktails, he reminded me.

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Konstantin

And saw live? The important point is always important, but here especially. With all the glamor and pops live look very powerful, and not another word to choose .

Seen alive in Europe a little bit - not impressed , but was never personal .
In Russia, the one seen in the exhibition have Galeeva - opinion has not changed .
Generally Lempicka made ​​no impression of the artist who is losing badly in the reproduction
Maybe somewhere just did not catch up

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от fabosch

one had seen at an exhibition at the Galeev

I also saw
yes [/URL]?

With the "woman in black" are not comparable.
Although still-life, too good.

[яня]

And it is almost entirely a collection of Ina Bazhenova.
Here Rousseau, however, you have attributed it to the other, it - winter Rousseau.
And Sera little forgotten.
Sorry, at a press conference called it the appearance of a sensation in the area of ​​Russian collectibles.
And the truth - the country has only one there.
The Hermitage))).

[Синица]

Сообщение от Yan

And this is almost entirely a collection of Ina Bazhenova.

Jana, you are talking about?
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[яня]

I mean the place where Konstantin caught in collectors.
What has gone somewhere else?
Then this is where Redon, Rouault, Utrillo, Rousseau, Kiesling ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Yan

And this is almost entirely a collection of Ina Bazhenova.

Here is a post.

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Konstantin

I too have seen this so[/URL]?

Yes, he is . Well, no catches .
Although these Lempicka " fatter " will be .
I think if the " art history " would not be " hysterical style ", Lempicka took a much more modest .
Yes, plus the gender of the case.
Really, too many superficial ...
Like Frida Kahlo.
However, a matter of taste

Added after 10 minutes

Сообщение от Yan

And Sulphur little forgotten.

And there is sulfur?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от fabosch; 2077001"

I think if the " art history " would not be " hysterical style ", Lempicka took a much more modest .

So she took a seat on any backyard , next to " Byaltusom ", " Fyuzhitoy " and other tripe (which comrade . Frida Kahlo , I would not have made ​​- it is absolutely did not know how ).

Who loves her ? Ladies in vintage fur ?
Duc are not listed as a ikspertshy .