"If the galleries are closed - so that someone needs."

[манна]

Сообщение от Fed; 2071851"

I can not remember the year, otherwise interesting exhibitions in museums today (not even pathos), no-interesting.

If this year you will be just as rich in interesting contemporary exhibitions in museums, pliz share at least a modest fotoreportazhikom. Do not be so secretive.

Сообщение от Fed; 2071851"

I even guess because of what the fuss generally. In Russia, a new "super idea" to build a Russian "Pompidou Museum," but of course with more than 10 times and 100 is more expensive. That is, will soon begin spawning.

I do not understand your sarcasm. In Russia you choking on an abundance of present-day museums. art? Example bring decent, do you think of the museum.
 

The Paris Museum of Modern Art of the Palais de Tokyo opened on Thursday after nearly a year of reconstruction, which the French government spent 26 million dollars. The museum has tripled its exhibition space and has become one of the largest spaces for contemporary art shows in Europe. The museum opened to the public display of performances in the non-stop, and April 20th Triennial opens Paris - the first major exhibition in the renovated space of the museum.
http://artinvestment.ru/news/artnews...415_tokyo.html

Let there be no museums! If only there was no spawning. It's funny to read on this forum is.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от zarajara

Why close the gallery, can someone explain

Who told you that close?
Just redesigned for new projects and all ..

[zarajara]

Сообщение от Eugene

Who told you that close ? Just redesigned for new projects and all ..

In fact, in an article about it written. Became interested in learning motivated.
What the redesigned , too, is understandable and interesting , too, is why: gallery developed a resource? there is a more effective form of communication with the author and the viewer /buyer ? the state runs into the art of business or can do - the art ? profitable area of ​​the restaurant fit ? ...
Hundreds of reasons , I wanted to hear (and they appeared ), the competent comments.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от zarajara; 2072091"

state comes over to the art of business or can do - the art ?

Or trying to seize the initiative , to redirect the energy to surround with care, as you like. Recently there was a chain of events . Sofia Trotsenko Winery moved from the culture in the Moscow government . Marina Loshak ( winery, Proun ) will soon lead the new government platform arena . Now reformatted while three galleries in formats that enable more likely to work with public money . Maybe coincidence , of course.

[Fed]

Сообщение от manna

I do not understand your sarcasm.

I do not like the "cost".

[Vladimir]

Yesterday at the mall, "Color" lecture by Sergei Popov held on contemporary art. Gallery owner told me about the "fat days" prior to the crisis. Reminisced about the explosive growth of the prices of the sixties and seventies. The fact that the rise was premature and our art is not managed properly sound in the world. I remember the apt phrase, attributed to Paul Pepperstein that institutions (museums, biennale, etc.) "bribe" can be, and the market can not be corrupt. In the sense that in the medium term, they can not manipulyarovat - "invisible hand" will return prices to the equilibrium level of the market.

What did you talk about the crisis? The fact that the decline of interest in Russian and is associated with decreased interest in Russia as a whole. Newsmakers Today - China and Southeast Asia. And Russia does not produce processes, interesting world. It is believed that the auction firm Phillips BRIC will no longer be held. Because the gap in interest in the vast country today. Another told of the information distortions. For example, channels are unlikely to come into the gallery, no matter how steep it was not a show. The country has a stereotype - Fu-commerce. Well, to the hidden advertising is not rebuked. And in the museum "camera" will come, which is understandable.

Well, what to do? Out of any situation, even negative, we must try to benefit. What does this mean in this case? Perhaps the opportunity to buy good stuff at a discount. Prices and so substantially adjusted downwards. And now the buyer says gallery owner can choose the range of 150 to 150 000 euros.
Perhaps in the beginning of the week will be launched by an article Popov, with his eye on the reformatting of the galleries.

[parsley]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Yesterday at the mall, "Color" lecture by Sergei Popov held on contemporary art.

What is a "color" for your interest in the art market?
This series of lectures?
Or just played Sergei?
Tell us, please.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от parsley; 2073461 '

What is a " color " for your interest in the art market? This series of lectures ? Or just played Sergei ? Tell us , please .

The " color" in the format of public art , an exhibition of Olga and Oleg Tatarintseva - sculpture and graphics. http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...31#post2072631 They worked pop /off /art Popov. Soon, the closure of the exhibition. So it is including a supporting event.

[Vladimir]

Belatedly tell. We're with Konstantin went on Monday at a press conference "reformatted" galleries - Salakhova, Gelmanov and Selina. That impression.

Press conference of the three "closing" galleries collected over hundreds of spectators - fellow gallerists, collectors, journalists, supporters and the merely curious. However, something sensational to learn it only by those who never watched the press in the past month and a half. In general, version of the main motivations of galleries was confirmed: in the present conditions to make the nonprofit organization is easier than commercial. Plus, fatigue, impact, and perhaps the core moral obligations, hanging on his feet.

In a non-profit structure have more flexibility - and you can "raise funds" can be money in the budget and other forms of state qualify, you can participate in foreign exhibitions, do not save every penny. Finally, it is more convenient to communicate with the sponsors (not business at the business the money requested, and non-profit organization). That is, instead of constantly thinking about how to make ends meet, former gallery owners will be able to focus on an ambitious and exciting curatorial projects. At least in theory. Moreover, it is not a commitment to renounce commerce. If you want to sell something, you can always find the options. Collectors, buyers ignore, certainly not prove.

In general, the plan they have - to leave the stage no one is going. Get - well. With the state as a state. However, Gelman has complained that the state as a business - not the best partners for the arts. In the sense that the interests do not coincide. Instead, ask for some loyalty, others - comfort. And the best partner of art - the territory. Both need a drive, development, public interest. Therefore, he himself headlong into a large-scale regional project "Cultural Alliance."
That's something like that. In general, there is no catastrophe, but there are new challenges that need to respond.

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Vladimir; 2083331"

no no accident, but there are new challenges that need to respond.

I am the press conference did not like. Solid dithyramb: "Oh how much you have done for the market ..." I do not know, we Artinvestment.ru nothing special, but even more so for much of the market have not noticed. Organization and holding this press conference is the best evidence of this. Who and how to invite him? But no one, because of his hearing was sold. It's that professionalism that? The event, after introductory words quickly turned into a regular get-together, who said that now the bad, who said that tolerant, but almost no one said why. One Gelman tried to analyze the situation, but ... All the laws again, some are missing, and state aid. I was not interested in listening, interesting but not interesting.
From the state to ask some help - just stupid, any project is considered very material benefit to officials at all levels, not any action from the perspective of the country, business in it, but as a process to get more and better without the process. And the struggle of pressure groups for the opportunity to stick to financial flows.