Two winter landscape

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от John Preston; 2033001"

So what we have now - is the remnant of her former beauty .

My two cents .
Yes , cleaning the "kills" charm.
The more serious cleaning, the less the balance of charm .
As a result , the net work without charm .... and without great artistic /decorative value ......
Stripping it of " coked " work has another downside .
"Coke " in one way or another " merged " with a colorful layer.
Restorer wants it or not, the upper layer of the paint layer will be affected ( removed) .
Typically, this is the top layer and contains subtle refinement of the artist, - shadows, pointing the contrast , volume, enhance color . As the mind is " losing " the restorer must " return " back. Not a simple thing, not one .
Was the customer of such restorations and saw a total of such restorations.
I liked some of the results , but very seldom ....

[John Preston]

As far as I know, they do not all paint is removed, as it were, liquefy it and remove the percent by 70%...
In the idea of ​​a layer of paint should not be affected ...
Maybe I do not say so, then correct me.

[sergejnowo]

What would paint began to play , the idea of ​​a "70 %" will not do, will malovasto .
I do not spec , see " over the shoulder ."
Restorer of 2 - 3 - 4 components of the solvent blends , which on chemical characteristics suited to the purification of a particular job. The logic : take the dirt as the paint is minimal.
Then slowly and tediously , pompon with the solvent , removes layer by layer. In tight places lotions work .

[Toinen]

sergejnowo, is absolutely right, the main charm of the two winter landscapes in this age.
With the removal of old paint and traces of existence disappear and charm of the artistic value of works, however.

I would not touch them.

[John Preston]

My friends , it all depends on the restorer , I think so ... When I was able to remove the daylight , lay out a picture of a little-known French artist around the same time , it's just heaven and earth, that was before the restoration , and that was after, before, as they say, " no tears " on the job was not to look . ..

[I-V]

Сообщение от Toinen

IV, convinced that the hunter must be able to distinguish a deer from the stump.
Only in this Random Hunt makes sense.

It is, yes.
But here's a deer from a cow, it happens, and an experienced hunter did not at once distinguish (at least in the heat of "hunting"))


Where is "cow", where "the deer"?
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[Toinen]

Dear IV, I mean a very different hunting : small antique shops, unimportant auktsionchiki , flea markets , shopping in the population , and so on , and what you have shown ( hristomatiynye masterpieces of world-class ) - is hunt for the officials , when a deer tied to a tree. In fact, this is not hunting, but the question of expertise.

[I-V]

Сообщение от Toinen; 2033721"

Dear IV, I mean a very different hunting : small antique shops, unimportant auktsionchiki , flea markets , shopping in the population , etc.

A. .. now understood ))

Сообщение от Toinen; 2033721"

and the fact that you showed ( hristomatiynye masterpieces of world-class ) - is hunting for the officials , when a deer tied to a tree. In fact, this is not hunting, but the question examination .

Yes, you 're right. Especially because it is an art ... Here , even a deer tied to a tree stump may be ))

[Мира]

Can I try to guess?


The present:


Gauguin -1

Serebryakov - 2

Matisse - 1

Serov - 1

Cezanne - 2


Probably the other way around ...

[I-V]

Сообщение от World; 2034111"

I can try to guess ?

The present :

Gauguin -1
Serebryakov - 2
Matisse - 1
Serov - 1
Cezanne - 2

Perhaps the opposite is true ...

Well, in general , yes - except it was the opposite Gauguin <! - ~ 1 ~ -> But I must say, Gauguin copyists have turned out worse than others , and .
But here's who asked me this question - I'm not sure that would have coped better than you , World. These copyists of the Russian Museum, give them their due , work at height.

Here : http://www.artsstudio.com/