Should we discuss the correctness of the rating of Russian artists in the real art of the site?

[ANATOLY]

The cost of the artist's Russian or a foreigner is the cost of materials, labor and talent of the artist, but mainly because of ambition and stupidity buyer. For Rothko, in my opinion only of stupidity. Let the work is the most rasprekrasny , but who will give the price for it if the master is unknown, but if the brush on the canvas celebrity cleared the buyer throws hundreds of thousands of dollars.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от ANATOLY

buyer throws hundreds of thousands of dollars.

In cases with Rothko we are talking about tens of million dollars.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от ANATOLY

For Rothko, in my only folly.

Of course.

Millions of such pay.

Even millionaires are well-known customers are fools.
mnye people do not become millionaires, I agree.
There, among these millionaires, only the fools are.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от ANATOLY

For Rothko, in my opinion only of stupidity.

Of course.

Millions of such pay.

Even millionaires are well-known customers are fools.
mnye people do not become millionaires, I agree.
There, among these millionaires, only the fools are.

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от ANATOLY

For Rothko, in my opinion

Before continuing the conversation in this vein consider reading debate
here [/URL].

[ANATOLY]

Alas, modern man for the quality of painting is often perceived chemistry, technology , philosophy , physics ( optics section ), but what has that got to this fear seem zhivopisi.I most ignorant tenderly treated by Malevich , Rothko , Freud, and other similar Faibisovich in including a significant amount of work that king Pikasso.A golyy.A price - well, a gentleman wanted to please the beloved /boy with a pipe /, and the price works for him, that for some a pack of cigarettes , for many people it feeds .

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от ANATOLY; 1955821"

And most seem to fear the ignorant regard with affection Malevich , Rothko , Freud, and other similar Faibisovich , including a considerable amount of work Pikasso.A king has no clothes .

Not again . In vain did not heed the advice of Constantine. " An alternative view " on the history of art is to surprise no one . Start with a guide to the forum There is a section http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=1205 resonant themes. And about Malevich , too. http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...=26665&page=16

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от ANATOLY; 1955821"

And the prices , well, wanted to please a loved one gentleman /boy with a pipe /, and the price works for him, that for some a pack of cigarettes , for many people on this feed .

Here's another egregious case :
Cezanne for $ 250mln .

 King of Qatar bought for $ 250mln work of Cezanne , " Card Players ". Earlier this painting owned by a Greek tycoon Embirikos . Gagosian offered $ 220mln , but the royal family of Qatar, do not hesitate to pay $ 30 million more, plus a $ 50 million to the mediator.
Never in the world, no one piece of art is not worth $ 300,000,000 . Even the insurance does not exceed $ 200 million .
 

[artist]

Cezanne did not Rothko , no doubt . But the whole world market ( vsego! ) overheated , of course . Where and how - specifically. But the whole is overheated .
And think about it now is not the most illiberal people in the West . That's come up with so far, nothing has happened. But it will come up . This is HUGE and is a real problem . It's called : MODEL DEVELOPMENT.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

Here's another egregious case :

O tempora, a mores! ( a )

Slightly changed the rating is now the first to be Cezanne in the world table of ranks and ratings. This shows that there are no permanent ratings that the ratings depend on the sales price , the cost of the quality of painting and the artist's achievement more accurately. Price also depends on inflation , and so I wonder how much it will cost you a sheet when they decide to sell it. Owners are to be congratulated , they defended their money.

[DimaB]

Сообщение от Konstantin

We have just - all born in Russia , you get a rating .:

Kostya , I just realized what a catch ))) Take Carlo Bartolomeo Rastrelli - the sculptor, or even better - his son Bartolomeo Francesco, the great Russian architect. The latter arrived in St. Petersburg at the age of 17 years , and the first - and even earlier . But both unmistakable characters from the history of Russian art. Do not you include them in our auktsionniki if maybe you are lucky to meet them work? This is me - to the convention " registry of birth" . Sorry - but where you are " formed ", " emerged " - there homeland.