Art - a pyramid scheme.

[Fed]

Сообщение от kawaichka; 1858731"

to see the reaction and attitude of people to what we are currently doing .

Classes successful - found a painter. Who decided to give the painting to hand out to people with " a lack of funds ." Why should a man " with no " His picture is unknown, but if you decide to give , at least ....

The most amusing , that gives them another painter. Who sells his paintings for the " trillion dollars" and its not going to give away .

In this cheap clown (sorry professional clowns ) you can guess where the caravan.

[Pavel]

I doubt very much that Safronov earns as an artist. It seems to me that he had some business in addition , from the money, and art as a cover for solidity. With money you can and at least a picture of Sotheby's, at least to attach itself and also to buy , and then hang Rublyovka , since there denigi not think so. All very suspicious.

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Pavel; 1858891"

It seems to me that he had some business in addition to , and where the money

Сообщение от Pavel; 1858891"

With money you can and at least a picture of Sotheby's

Сообщение от Pavel; 1858891"

and then hang Rublyovka , since there denigi do not think

Money is now believed everywhere .
If he (Safronov ) earns money not art at all why would he spend ? And this money , for example, sold at Sotheby's a picture of yourself for $ 100 000 will have to pay 25-30%taxes. And then what will sell the unit ? For the art business is nothing , or be followed by others ( quite a costly steps) or - nonsense .
By the way looked at this sale - cool :

Estimate 10 000 - 15 000 GBP ( 16 442 - 24 663 USD, 11 196 - 16 794 EUR)
The result is 63 650 GBP ( 104 653 USD, 71 260 EUR)

From the start of the 16 442 $ price rose to a hundred people were trading in the hall. Cool.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Pavel

I doubt very much that Safronov earns as an artist. It seems to me that he had some business in addition , from the money, and art as a cover for solidity. With money you can and at least a picture of Sotheby's, at least to attach itself and also to buy , and then hang Rublyovka , since there denigi not think so. It was all very suspicious of it .

If the pictures do not buy (like now) - you can sell tickets to the show.

[Santa]

Looked at the results.

Total - 8 users voted. Of them - 4 - that Artmiramida - good ..

A little surprised.

I would like to hear a reasoned position of those who voted for t.s good.

I wonder still, why - it's good?
>

Thank you.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Money is now believed everywhere .
If he (Safronov ) earns money not art at all why would he spend ? And this money , for example, sold at Sotheby's a picture of yourself for $ 100 000 will have to pay 25-30%taxes. And then what will sell the unit ? For the art business is nothing , or be followed by others ( quite a costly steps) or - nonsense .
By the way looked at this sale - cool :

From the start of the 16 442 $ price rose to a hundred people were trading in the hall. Cool .

Grisha Bruskin , Nesterova .... a sale at Sotheby's. So matters. Then, pay 25 tons and will cost you 100,000. Hall and the fact exists.

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Pavel; 1859051"

Nesterov .... a sale at Sotheby's

Well, here with Sotheby's, Sotheby's as they say not a single

That auction stats:

Nesterova, Natalia Igorevna
1944
Work ( 123)
Painting ( 120)
Mixed media (3 )

Bruskin , Grisha
1945
Work ( 50)
        Painting ( 18)
        Mixed media (1)
        Graphics ( 12)
        Draw Products (12)
        Ceramics, porcelain (1)
        Sculpture ( 5)
        Object (1 )

This is the objective indicator .
For the slow-witted to get hold of . In Nesterovoj 123 paintings were sold at various auctions, Bruskin at 50. That's a lot .

[Fed]

In Bruskin-dozen at least Sotheby's in Nesterovoj-at least 5.

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Fed

at least a dozen Sotheby's

In Pavel sick theme auctions, in which he "in the subject line," excuse the tautology.
And for what it has to send a holiday break from the forum.


But we moved to the main topic of Art pyramids.

[kawaichka]

Сообщение от Konstantin

This is the objective indicator .
For the slow-witted to get hold of . In Nesterovoj 123 paintings were sold at various auctions, Bruskin at 50. That's a lot .

   In fact , even a number of sales can not be objectively measure , but only because we can not verify , but did not buy an artist painting himself at home, asking his friends to do likewise. Well this is the presence of start-up capital of course , or sponsors. So you can imagine the glory ensure you never know who has what ambitions. I think that nowadays so many technologies vparivaniya that any question can be put . I wonder how the average person to determine where the bullshit untwisted , and where the real work of art ?
   If you have money you can and 1,000 times in his own paintings at auctions to buy.