AA Kiselev, 1882

[uriart]

Kiselev this work "hand does not apply!

Two views can not be!

[John Preston]

Сообщение от any

This is the photo you have identified?

The photo, of course ...
In the hands of the painting did not hold.
>

[any]

Сообщение от Eugene

any, Call and tell you all the details .. http://art-expertise.ru/index.php?op...tpage&Itemid=1
At the forum the general opinion is questionable work .. you have to decide for himself what to do next ..

To doubts have disappeared , you need certification in any eminent expert ? For I have heard , now the masters of a lot ...

The link you gave provides an authoritative opinion ?

[Евгений]

Сообщение от any

Just think there is one "but."

They also need their equipment.
It is unlikely that they will come with Lupo.

Are you talking about?
who will come to you? "We must bring own.

Added after 51 seconds

Сообщение от "any

Shortcuts, you gave gives an authoritative opinion?

What you need bosses? There's a list of all there ..

[any]

Сообщение от John Preston

The photo , of course ... In the hands of the painting did not hold . >

Well then , you need to go to the experts , once you have these abilities .

Understand , dear .
I'm not trying to prove to you that this Kiselev .
This can be seen only on the conclusion of the examination.

I asked for help with removal .
Received good advice .

Still , I would like to hear the theoretical estimate of the work of Kiselev .
Not that specifically , and generally know how many are his creations .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от any

If I establishes his authorship (in theory ) would like to know the estimated value of paintings Kiselyov .

The most expensive sale of fixed pattern AA Kiselev - impending storm , " 1888 . , x /m , 125x177.
It was sold , the 06/14/2007 in London at Sotheby'se ( Lot 33 ) as much for 168,000 GBP( 330,943 USD, 248,661 EUR) Estimé 60 000 - 80 000 GBP ( 118,194 - 157,592 USD, 88 808 - 118 410 EUR).
So there! >

[any]

Сообщение от Eugene

What you need bosses? There's a list of all there ..

This question byd.

I do not know of authoritative experts, and therefore asked you whether the resource is that you gave, authoritative in the art world, for I am not competent in this.

[John Preston]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

The most expensive sale of fixed pattern AA Kiselev - impending storm , " 1888 . , x /m , 125x177.
It was sold , the 06/14/2007 in London at Sotheby'se ( Lot 33 ) as much for 168,000 GBP( 330,943 USD, 248,661 EUR) Estimé 60 000 - 80 000 GBP ( 118,194 - 157,592 USD, 88 808 - 118 410 EUR).
So there! >

Dear Cyril, and that will give the owner of this information ? Allow him to hypothetically imagine how he could get in if you 'd had a script AA Kiselev ? ) )

We also agree that talking about the obviously non-genuine stuff . I think you personally do not have the same questions on it ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[QUOTE="John Preston; 1611033] Dear [B]Cyril[/B], and that will give the owner of this information?
[/QUOTE]

The question was asked.
I replied.
>


[QUOTE="John Preston; 1611033] We also agree that talking about the obviously non-genuine stuff.
[/QUOTE]

We agree, we see that it is useless to explain something.
Easier to answer and let the fellow who decides.

[size="1"]Added after 2 minutes[/size]

Сообщение от "John Preston

I think you personally do not have the same questions on it ...

I have, yes, but also the author of the theme, too, seems to be no questions about authorship:

Сообщение от "any

In certain authorship.

[any]

Сообщение от John Preston

Dear Cyril, and that will give the owner of this information ? Allow him to hypothetically imagine how he could get in if you 'd had a script AA Kiselev ? ) )

We also agree that talking about the obviously non-genuine stuff . I think you personally do not have the same questions on it ...

Do not see the point , to prove something to you about zevodomoy inauthenticity .
I will deal with all the expertise .
With its expert opinion , I think your arguments are overcrowded spesisom lose meaning .

It is clear that all Members assert that this is not Kiselev , etc.
I'm sure the author of it .
Time and experts will judge .

It is due to all , beyond the point of view .