Albin Gavdzinsky

[redbor]

Сообщение от Serge Shevchuk

looked at photos of Yakov Sverdlov, and have to agree. Most likely it was he, and not Trotsky .. over the right shoulder of Lenin, his pince-nez glasses glinting ominously ....

Can not be.
Following the historical truth: time of the first parade on Red Square in May 1919go,
Sverdlov was already dead, his pince-nez is not shining, and lying under that same area.
It's like - Lenin on the tribune of the mausoleum of Lenin?
By the way, and the name of the boy know?

[тандем]

Сообщение от redbor

can not be.
Following the historical truth: time of the first parade on Red Square in May 1919go,
Sverdlov was already dead, his pince-nez is not shining, and lying under that same area.
It's like - Lenin on the tribune of the mausoleum of Lenin?
By the way, and the name of the boy know?

Tell me, does have some value in this, any means the case of "historical truth "?!!! Or artistic merit? This is exactly the case when the authorship is the definitive znachenie.Odno clearly - additional evidence simply because the necessary very difficult to switch from the usual highly of his works on this "can not be!".

[Вивьен]

Сообщение от redbor; 1535553"

Or you can ask him if he remembers: that the event depicted, and the names of persons involved in the painting

He still remembers what it was 60 or 70 years ago, too, remembers. The painting depicts Lenin, Comrade Sverdlov. Trotsky did not like the artist to depict in their works. Dzerzhinsky's still all right. A Sverdlov was one of the favorite characters. When he wrote this essay to zakazushke, there was no thought as you, to count when someone died, when was the first parade. Lenin and Sverdlov. Everything. "Do not look for" lice "where none exist.
ANTIK, want proof? You have not enough signatures on paper, on the back? Do you have doubts, tell them to.

Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от "ANTIK

If I understand you correctly, Gavdzinsky can confirm this work if it is to bring to the author??

Yes.
Of course.

[ANTIK]

Thank you for the fact that I want this rasmotret rabotu.I if we can resolve the issue of buying, then bring the work for approval is even more vazhno.Tem author is alive!

[Вивьен]

Сообщение от "ANTIK

Thank you, the fact is that I want this rasmotret rabotu.I if it will decide whether to buy, then bring to the job approval is even more vazhno.Tem author is alive!

Already put a kettle

[redbor]

Сообщение от Vivien

when I wrote this etude to zakazushke,

A zakazushka was done?
Somewhere to look at the painting itself?

[Вивьен]

Сообщение от "redbor

A zakazushka was done?
Somewhere to look at the painting itself?

Nowhere to look.
Because as soon as the restructuring came into its own, and a large variant has not been written.
This work can rightly be considered a full and exclusive

[redbor]

Сообщение от "Vivien

restructuring soon joined their rights, and a large variant has not been written.

And that's right!
Master such wonderful scenery writes

Lenin, Sverdlov, these next to them not to put ..

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от Vivien

Trotsky, an artist did not like to portray in his works ..

He tried to write to the restructuring of Trotsky!

[серж шевчук]

Сообщение от redbor

can not be.

By the way, and the name of the boy knows?

immediately familiar to the anthropologist looked at the boy, and (no joke, I do not know) started quite seriously argue that a guy looks like Vladimir Putin in 1911 Spiridonovich birth (father of the very, Vladimir Vladimirovich). From my point of view, of course fiction, but it's not for nothing "dark forces" behind his right shoulder ... I think this is a brilliant visionary artist, which is known to be a genius does not come from them and through them ...