That's such trouble, can I recover it?

[OlegTsi]

In addition to congratulating the successful completion of the restoration, put your photo in the format before and after restoration.
So will more clearly see the work after recovery.

[Пелагея Ларина]

Сообщение от Toinen

Pelagia Larin, congratulations , well done ! Subframes correct and duplicated edges very carefully (probably otherwise have been impossible to pull the canvas ). Pictures have turned out - sight for sore eyes !

Thank you .
 With edges so it was - otherwise it was impossible , risky . Oh , and accurate.
 Well done guys ! Work slowly , but qualitatively . All the detail explain how and what can be done , offer options ..

[Santa]

Сообщение от "Pelagia Larina

C edges and it was - or was not,

Maybe.
Just Duplicate on new canvas.

Сообщение от "Pelagia Larina

Well done guys!

 

diligent restoration, diligent.

Similar to the work of the museum, student-A student)).

[Toinen]

Сообщение от "Santa

Just Duplicate on new canvas

[Ika-Ika]

Toinen, where you take such beautiful pictures? "It's steeper than Malevich.

[Пелагея Ларина]

Сообщение от Santa

Maybe.
Just Duplicate on new canvas.

Why??
"With respect to works owned by me - I'm against it.
 

Сообщение от Santa

diligent restoration, diligent.

Similar to the work of the museum, student-A student)).

Museum - YES

Apprentice - NO

Excellent - agrees.
>

[Santa]

Сообщение от Pelagia Larina, 1639143

for the work, I've owned - I'm against.

It's Chief argument, so to develop the idea of ​​dublirovke makes no sense.

I have no questions.

[Toinen]

Сообщение от "Santa

This is the main argument

In my opinion the main argument - the expediency!
If the canvas is very old and decrepit, the duplication can not be avoided, because
otherwise, when a stretch canvas may burst.

[Santa]

Сообщение от Toinen

Lavna argument - expediency !

for the preservation of all the product as a whole - Duplicate it would be better , but the owner (in this case - Pelagia Larin) was against it , it means that you have She had a cause and its arguments .
All the more so as one of the options , it is ( dublirovku ) is uniquely offered .
In general , this is again a dispute about the commercial and museum restoration, and so this topic can be developed to infinity !
Satisfied Pelagia Larin - and very good ) )

[Пелагея Ларина]

Сообщение от Toinen

In my opinion the main argument - the expediency!
If the canvas is very old and decrepit, the duplication can not be avoided, because
otherwise, when a stretch canvas may burst.

Canvas strong enough.
But the new edge is still used.
I think everything is done properly.
Or am I not right?