Are you ready to fly domestic prints? Poll

[sur]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

To be on Murakami, must have approximately the same track record.

 Seeks to have all the same for the better, but of course you have to take into account the cost. Prints should not be too expensive, but nevertheless, the price of 1000 rubles. proposed Seriy in its survey as the maximum is too low, in my opinion, a good print on canvas with the artist's signature .......................... ....

[Seriy]

sur, please read carefully - "more than 1000 rubles."


Must be a balance.
If an artist of world fame is one, the artist in the national Top 20 - other.
And if many of the popular Moscow artists for the price of an original oil on canvas - 30 thousand rubles and even lower-how much you buy them print?

[sur]

Сообщение от Seriy

has to be balance.
If an artist of world fame is one, the artist in the national Top 20 - other.

 
And to me, it seems that a normal buyer does not pay for what is an artist in the tops, but for the very thing that buys)))

[artcol]

Сообщение от sur

And me, it seems that a normal buyer does not pay for what is an artist in the tops, but for the very thing that buys )))

These are two different mutually exclusive preference for a choice: either name or picture.
For someone who focuses on the name - the picture is not essential, but for someone who on the aesthetics and to your taste - on the contrary.

[Seriy]

sur, of course ... and the top - this is the most loved and bought by artists who have most loved people pictures, there is no contradiction.

Izorynke really sold on anything apart from the name?

Approaching the counter with prints (suspended) Buyer says, give me a good print?

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от artcol

Let's not confuse two different things. I'm not sure what Hearst called giclee prints were even, but there have not even sur'a giclee, and simply print. Know what I mean?
__________________

Let us (again, for the umpteenth time!) Define some terminology. There's even a theme: "didzhigrafiya "....

artcol, what, (you think) is different, "giclee" from the "print"?
Giclee print, too, and so-called "Didzhigrafiya .. (This is in the forehead and across his forehead ")...
names are different, but the essence of what is one! (High quality (digital, ie. Digital) computer printing on special. High-quality materials (canvas, paper, laminates and t.d.i.t.p.) ...

[artcol]

Сообщение от Seriy

Izorynke really sold on anything apart from the name?

Of course, like any other.

But here the name I use in terms of popularity.

[sur]

Сообщение от Seriy; 1486691"

in which most favorite people picture

 And what pictures my favorite people? And how do people? Earlier in the villages, perhaps the most popular painting was "Three heroes" I've seen it in many suburban cottages .....

 Now it's different! For me, trying to sell prints - it is also a test: how I feel right time)))

[artcol]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

artcol, what, (you think) is different, "giclee" from the "prints"?

And you yourself, and answer the question:

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

High quality (digital, ie. Digital) computer printing specials. high-quality materials (canvas, paper, laminates and t.d.i.t.p. )...

I do not know the nuances, but you can print on any printer make and giclees - a

standing before print Murakami and looking at him at point-blank from a distance of 10 cm (under the watchful eye protection), I thought, "in which the same remote village we live in!"

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Seriy

I align with the Picasso, the r e when there is a beautiful problem, I go to the site and look how he solved it.

That's right, you see how he decided, not on those sums that pay for his things.
In other words: you first need to become "Murakami Picasso, and then to discuss the circulation of prints and count the money in his head:

Let the revenue-500 RR-500000 RR-15 thousand dollars ... Yes, it is not enough ..
Let income 2000 rubles (then the price of 3000) - 60 thousand dollars
A series of 30 pictures, 1 million 800 thousand U.S. dollars

Do you own (pl.) do not laugh at such discussions?