What distinguishes the true artist from not present?

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Pavel

All these artists are hanging in museums, but not as work but as an example of bad painting.

Who for example?

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Seriy

Mona, if by and large, the artist's personal life is his personal life, someone who slept, drank, what the nature and stuff, all biliberda. It is important that he wrote-pictures.

Seriy, this "nonsense" is very important for understanding many bivehioralnyh (behavioral), the component motifs creativity. (Unless, of course not be suitable for pure consumer, considering creativity as a result, rather than as a process.)
Would not it be Theo-there would be Vincent, (for example) ..

[Posav]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Seriy, this "nonsense" is very important for understanding many bivehioralnyh (behavioral), the component motifs creativity. (Unless, of course not be suitable for pure consumer, looking at art as a result, not as a process.)
Would not it be Theo-there would be Vincent, (eg )..

I agree. Van Gogh honestly gives a little primitive, but what a beautiful legend, an example of role models for artists as a way of life. I love him so rich because they could not afford such a life, do something that is interesting, to carry out his dream of buying a Van Gogh as they want to buy a piece of such a life.
And as Picasso saw the film as he was a tyrant in his personal life and nothing interesting to him.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Veronic

This is like someone?

The history of Impressionism.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Posav

I agree. Van Gogh honestly gives a little primitive, but what a beautiful legend, an example of role models for artists as a way of life. I love him so rich because they could not afford such a life, do something that is interesting, to carry out his dream of buying a Van Gogh as they want to buy a piece of such a life.
And as Picasso saw the film as he was a tyrant in his personal life and nothing interesting to him.

films are films.
Matisse too primitive gives?

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Pavel

History of Impressionism.

Added after 2 minutes
Movies are movies.
Matisse too primitive gives?

Paul said, 'So tell me BS interesting to know whose such bad hang in museums.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Posav

And as Picasso saw the film as he was a tyrant in his personal life and nothing interesting to him.

Сообщение от Posav

Van Gogh frankly a bit primitive gives

That level of discussion.!
Adorable!

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Veronic

Paul, said, 'So tell me BS interesting to know who have such bad hang in museums.

Sami themselves. I fall asleep on the second fraze.Eto very prosto.Sami enjoy.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

This level of discussion.!
Glitter!

What kind of didactic manner. You first prove that you know more. You remember, I learned what a Mason.

[Причал]

Ladies and gentlemen, I'm sorry - I have not yet fully understood the forumskom content --
I have a question:

At the forum there is a branch of the Union of realists "?< ! - ~ 7 ~-->

He has now been on the agenda is to discredit the bourgeois myth of the cultural, artistic and historical value of Van Gogh?

____________

Lord, pardon me, comrades!

Wake me плиз, the glorification of the artist Magritte, feel the shortage of information on this author
and believe that the methodology of development of information during the quarrels discussion very efficacious


And if you can read out the entire list of unworthy
I will miss the essence of the proletarian, and in tables and figures to delve

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

You remember I learned what a Mason.

No, uncle, is not yours.
I'm at a European auction from the hall saw the picture and it seemed familiar to me. Stakes were and I bought a start. Useful, thought to podarak there or something ...
And came home and found the author.
You yourself can this subject The Enigma "Smokers" to view and memory "refresh":
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...2795&highlight =%D0%BA%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%89%D0%B8 %D0%BA

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от Pavel

What a didactic manner.

Not "mentor" and enthusiastic. Admire the level of discussion.


Added after 4 minutes

Сообщение от Pavel

you first prove that you know more.

This is to whom?
You?
Or Posav y?
He can not, "a film about Picasso seen ...

[LCR]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Yes, and you do I "prove" I will not, you yourself have everything and everyone "proven" and shown.

No, no, Kirill, so you can easily not get off!
Pavlik is not the first time accuses you of ignorance - for instance, you did not know what the real name of Mark Rothko was radish (and that he was traitor, by any way because, apparently, the capitalists, and pay for his paintings millions)