Mark Rothko

[artcol]

Сообщение от Seriy

ten times you have said

Yes? So what?

Сообщение от Seriy

scale - composition, color, line, stroke , has not changed for hundreds of years , if not thousands , and is called art.

Why are you so sure?

You have repeatedly " incriminating " in the (same "ten times " ) that you images technique (tool ) is reduced to art itself (the target) , and in fact it is not ( although, of course , are two sides of the same coin ).

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Seriy; 2318671"

Generally speaking, if the buyer has a home , minimalist design, Makovsky, he does not need , and Rothko - yes!

Perfect adapted explanation!
Want to rephrase : (Sergey, sorry for liberty ): If a customer in the brain minimalist ( kontrmporari ) mentality , Makovsky he does not need ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Seriy; 2318671"

Generally speaking, if the buyer has a home , minimalist design, Makovsky, he does not need , and Rothko - yes !

Well , Rothko still not well suited for the home , in my opinion.
This artist for public spaces , museums , galleries.
Ideally, gvorit , approached him 14 paintings commissioned for a chapel in Houston, Texas.
By the way, after putting these pictures vchasovnyu its founders John and Dominique de Menil /John and Dominique de Menil) decided to make the chapel is available for people of all faiths and is now ivestna into all the world as the Rothko Chapel /Rothko Chapel, it is registered in the included in the National register of Historic Places /National Register of Historic Places, it annually attracts more than 60,000 people and it works as a church , a museum and a place for the forum.

Now this chapel with paintings Rothko and Barnett Newman sculpture recognized as an example of the greatest artistic achievements of the second half of the twentieth century.

Добавлено через 35 минут

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

If the buyer in the brain of a minimalist (kontrmporari) mentality, Makovsky he does not need ...

Interestingly, in the brain of a man hanged himself at his home here sort Makovsky?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

If the buyer in the brain of a minimalist (kontrmporari) mentality, Makovsky he does not need ...

Interestingly, in the brain of a man hanged himself at his home here sort Makovsky?

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

Interestingly, in the brain of a man hanged himself at his home here sort Makovsky?

Oh ...! ....
("Do you think, what I think?" (C))

Although ...
You can beat anything if (Delacroix paraphrasing), "you let it surround memes that I deem this necessary" ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Beat all is possible ...

Probably, but I'm talking about " in the brain ".

[John Preston]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

Interestingly, in the brain of a man hanged himself at his home here sort Makovsky?

Cyril, believe it or not, I had such Makovsky would love to have hung himself, had enough money!


What's in my head?
Probably, sawdust, judging by your bewilderment ...
:;

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от John Preston

What's in my head? Probably, sawdust ...

You said . ( c)

Сообщение от John Preston; 2319021"

... believe it or not, I had such Makovsky would love to have hung himself , had enough money !!

Believe , of course.
Philip Kirkorov concert people also go with joy.
But, you see , Hans Zatska steeper.
This is not some kind of Mexican jerboa , this is the leopard ! I recognize them by hue. See how the fur is in the sun!

[zarajara]

We're all a mixture thoroughly. I can not imagine someone Rothko in the bedroom, and most of the Contemporary too. I suspect that those who buy these works for a lot of money to keep their bedroom "swans." But the tastes of different strata of the society or its individual members - this is not the area of ​​art and art history, there's more - social psychology and personality psychology. If you feel like it, you can even try to understand why someone like Makovsky, and someone Malevich, but I think that is another issue.
Also the problem of pricing for the two very different concepts of "value" and "value." Those members, who are pushing that "I look after her, nothing in it is not" just confuse these concepts. Because if something goes into the category of values, then it loses its value (or its value is purely arbitrary possible $ 1 billion and it is possible). Eg love - value and as we know, it can not be bought, but when it ceases to be a value she has a price, and not even very big. The same applies to all other values, all of which abstract categories.
Rothko, Duchamp, Malevich, Picasso, Warhol, etc. - This is a value category. Expressed their creativity and sense of self changed a century. Without them, the culture would be different. Anyone who pays for their work the money actually gets some value, the possession of which is itself a value (status, prestige, etc.).
P.S. And I do not like the Mona Lisa, but it does not matter. This product is an asset for the whole of modern culture. All that is required - is the realization of this fact, not to try my best to love Mona Lisa (Rothko, Malevich, etc.)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от zarajara

Rothko, Duchamp, Malevich, Picasso, Warhol, etc.
- This is a value category.
Expressed their creativity and sense of self changed a century.
Without them, the culture would be different.

Absolutely!

In the words of Picasso - "my art in every modern toilet" .