How to unleash the artist

[Pavel]

Сообщение от iosif

Pavel, it seems, you got my words too literally, the only one of its side. No oversupply of artists and gallery owners lack, here's the thing. After all, new intermediaries will not be able to select customers from the old ones. Hence, they will create a new customer base, that is, to develop the market. Seminars, friends pull (and artists), the standard marketing techniques to use (like most artists can not, will not and can not).
And to an artist with no intermediary squabbled should apply again the standard legal procedures at the beginning of joint work. More precisely, to start working together. This is in addition to personal integrity, not replace it.

When the artist hyping, then create fame by marketing techniques the artist who does not deserve it often, and it is implied. Paid for it, etc. Buyers of the artist should be happy? But after a while they realize that they just cheated. Here's a better rasrutki inappropriately. Requires a broad exhibition and artists, from whom comes to fame and only then come to them.
In general, to talk about the market must first determine what the market. I show that market online Drouot, but no interest.

[iosif]

Pavel, means that it is necessary to spin a bad artist?
Why?!
Much more favorable to spin good.
Less money will be spent >

Added after 2 minutes 45 minutes
Artoil-A, I think that the mediator does not have to lead the artist.
It can only generate Institute artist on market preferences.
And what if the artist asks him about it.

[Artoil-A]

Сообщение от iosif

Pavel, means that it is necessary to spin a bad artist? Why?! Much more favorable to spin good. Less money will be spent >

Added after 2 hours 45 minutes
Artoil-A, I think that the mediator does not have to lead the artist. It can only generate Institute artist on market preferences. And what if the artist asks him about it.

Like this is being formed, but without the promotion of the artist. Intermediary need the result - quickly sold the picture.
I remember well in the 80's, art mediator demanded simply copy or interpret, offering or sample pictures, or photos, or print out the art directory. In the 2000s, the genre was called, was known for the estimated price paid by the artist, and the approximate size of the picture. (For example, a modern urban landscape. Canvas stretcher in the factory. Medium format. Price 300 - $ 500).
Market leading artists of the time required of apprentices to work in their genre and style, but exhibited very high demands on the equipment and technology of painting. Then the work of apprentices sold leading artist.
Are all different forms of leadership.

[iosif]

Artoil-A, I can not agree with you.
What you tell - certainly interesting, and certainly about the business.
But hardly about art.
Rather, all the same DPI.
I'm not a reproach, in DPI's nothing bad things, just for accuracy.

[Artoil-A]

Сообщение от iosif

Artoil-A, I can not agree with you. What you tell - certainly interesting, and certainly about the business . But hardly about art . Rather , all the same DPI. I'm not a reproach , in DPI 's nothing bad things , just for accuracy .

Arts and crafts and computer design provide fast and relatively large sums of money (above the average wage) . One artist , leader of a brigade of artists in the 80 's, once told me that before each ( artist) life puts a choice or a yacht , or talk about a great ...
He then recruited apprentices. Unfortunately, then , neither I nor my surroundings artists did not have the equipment and technology of painting. But the brain is communication cleaned.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от iosif

Pavel, means that it is necessary to spin a bad artist?
Why?!
Much more favorable to spin good.
Less money will be spent

How will you know who it is good.
Commercial success is very fleeting.

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от iosif

Artoil-A, I can not agree with you.
What you tell - certainly interesting, and certainly about the business.
But hardly about art.
Rather, all the same DPI.
I'm not a reproach, in DPI's nothing bad things, just for accuracy.

Most of kitsch.

[Artoil-A]

Сообщение от Pavel

How do you determine who it was good. Commercial success is very fleeting .

Added after 1 minute

Most of kitsch .

Kitsch is not requiring commercial art sponsor. Moreover, sustainable income . Moving to kitsch requires serious research and additional training of the artist, who was the standard training. Well, the artist will be sponsored , in anticipation of the great and eternal , and a commercial artist will nail down the money ... By the way , the income kitsch brings decades.
Naturally, members of the household do not appreciate the genius did not take place .

[Pablo]

Сообщение от Artoil-A

households will not appreciate the genius did not take place.

It depends on many criteria: despite what the household, there is income in addition to art, etc.

May appreciate the genius of his grandchildren or great-grandchildren?

[artcol]

Сообщение от iosif

Artoil-A, I can not agree with you. What you tell - certainly interesting, and certainly about the business . But hardly about art . Rather , all the same DPI. I'm not a reproach , in DPI 's nothing bad things , just for accuracy .

"High" kitsch as it is also an art ... The same Warhol.

Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от Pavel

How do you determine who it was good.

Key criteria - uniqueness .

[Artoil-A]

Сообщение от artcol

" High" kitsch as it is also an art ... The same Warhol.

Added after 5 minutes

Key criteria - uniqueness .

I think that the original is well equipped workshop and the ability to use the equipment.
The uniqueness is twofold:
- Minor changes the traditional ;
- The ability to compose Surrey.
The other does not see. I think clowning (performance ) does not apply to painting .