Royal wedding

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I another reasonsubtracted.

And what does the Falkland Islands - not the territory UK?

Posted 3 minutes

Сообщение от Posav

Get used to it, times have changed. Now all we need to closely monitor the index potrebitelkih sentiment in the U.S. dollar, watch out for the wedding of the richest people and Hollywood news. What else should I do if all your prostsrali.

Its - it's just what? In the Soviet Union from his only clothing was, and personal hygiene items. Exaggerating, of course ...

The inventory of property Stalin IV


"March 5, 1953 in 22 hours and 30 minutes, I, the commandant of Near Cottage Orlov, a senior attached Starostin, Assistant Took, employee Butusova inventoried l /property Stalin IV at the direction of Comrade Beria.

1. Notepad for entries in a cover made of leather gray;
2. Notebook, leather, red;
3. Personal records, notes, compiled on separate sheets and vouchers. Numbered only 67 pages (sixty-seven);
4. Total notebook with records, red cover;
5. Smoking pipes - 5. Among them: 4 boxes and specials. devices, and tobacco. In his study of Stalin: books, desk accessories, gifts are not included in the list.
Bedrooms and Closets:
6. Tunic white - 2 pcs. (Both attached star of Hero of Socialist Labor).
7. Gray tunic, p /day - 2 piece.
8. Tunic of dark green - 2 piece.
9. Pants - 10;
10.Nizhnee clothes piled in a box under the number 2.
In the box under № 3 stacked: 6 jacket, 10 trousers, 4 coats, 4 caps. In the box under the number 1 stacked notepads, notebooks, personal records. Vanno-shower accessories packed in a box number 4. Other property owned by Comrade Stalin in the inventory were not included. While completing the inventory and document - 0 hours 45 minutes 6 March 1953.
Present: (signature) Orlov (signature) Starostin (signature) Took (signature) Butusova.
The bedroom was discovered a passbook, it recorded 900 rubles.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol; 1622901 "

What does the Falkland Islands - UK territory ?

Here's to you and " hello " !
Argentina in 1982 too, so the question is asked and received taaaakih ... lyuley that I forgot about " their Islas Malvinas " again , and I think forever , but a military junta took off . >

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Here's to you and " hello " !
Argentina , however , in 1982 too, so the question is asked and received taaaakih ... lyuley that I forgot about " their Islas Malvinas " again , and I think forever , but a military junta took off . >

Damn , "not " removed when edited the phrase .
I think both versions converge in my version of events :
1) The islands belonged to the crown
2 ) corpse V ( O ) sama took off into the sea
3 ) Map trends estimate that will beat the corpse to the Falkland Islands
4 ) the prince was sent there to reflect terr.ataki
I think so (C ) Inquisitive

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "artcol

In the Soviet Union from his only clothing was, and personal hygiene items.

And with clothing, and hygiene items in the Soviet Union was strained.

Toilet paper, for example, was carried from Moscow, "in" such a product was not simple.
>

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And with clothing, and hygiene items in the Soviet Union was strained.

Toilet paper, for example, was carried from Moscow, "in" such a product was not simple.
>

On defense, probably go away.
Of the bourgeoisie.
A ONE - with the rear vdarili: climbed in the CPSU Central Committee and the top all destroyed.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol; 1623001"

on defense, probably go away.

Yes, it ...
We are ahead of the rest ... (c) >

cars in 1990:
USSR - 17 million
United States - 193 million

Tanks in 1990 were:
Soviet Union - 63 900 pcs. (No allies in WA)
NATO - 24,344 pcs.

In this case, the GDP of the USSR was at least 2 times smaller than U.S. GDP. With an equal number of people.

To further understand the issue:
Colonel-General Alexander Danilevich, former deputy chief of General Staff and one of the Soviet military leaders directly responsible for military planning:
"What we had at the end of the 80's? We had:
- 12,000 strategic nuclear warheads, roughly the same amount of ammunition was from the Americans.
But as for conventional weapons, we had a substantial advantage. In 1991, there were
- 63.9 thousand tanks (not counting the tanks of the Allies)
- 66.9 thousand artillery shells,
- 76,5 thousand infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers,
- 12,2 thousand airplanes and helicopters,
- 437 large warships.
We have the tanks was 6 times greater than that of NATO.

The cost of the T-72 was 250 000. Retail price "VAZ" penny in 1979 - 5900 rubles.

From 1974 to 1982,
USSR surpassed the U.S. to produce an ICBM in 5,9 times (2035 units in the Soviet Union against 346 in the U.S.)
the tanks - in 2,7 times (or 17,350 against 6400),
on APCs and infantry fighting vehicles - in 7,6 times (36,650 vs. 4800)
on tactical aircraft - 2 times (6100 vs. 3050),
on large surface ships - in 1,2 times (85 vs. 72),
on multi-purpose submarines - in 2,3 times (61 vs. 27),
on tactical nuclear missiles - in 1,6 times (5850 vs. 3550)
on SSBNs - in 16.5 times (33 vs. 2),
by field artillery guns and multiple rocket launchers - to 38.1-fold (13 thousand 350 vs. 350).
 

 >
I have seen here.

[Santa]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

We're ahead of the rest ..

.. And just in the field of ballet, we are ahead of the rest ..
>

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Santa

.. and only in the field of ballet, we are ahead of the rest

But, I say, we do launch

And blocked the Yenisei

And also in the field of ballet,

We are ahead of, say, the whole planet,

We are ahead of the rest! (c) >

[Santa]

Although today, it too is no longer relevant ..

As said Nikolai Tsiskaridze, in the transmission of V. Pozdnera - a school of Russian ballet with all the forces trying to destroy ...
> >

So it has nothing to "shake", apart from the nuclear cudgel, saying >

[Tana]

I behold such a moment of interest when online auctions are discussed , work c neskolkosot thousandths or millionth estimeytami , buying and nobody moans that zazhralis that the terms of such grief , so many poor people, no one remembers the hungry,

 and here the royal wedding , which was broadcast around the world , an important event for the UK and suddenly went to comment that with fat rage , poor and miserable remember , that's where they have double standards > > >